Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Importance-Performance Analysis on the e-Learning Content Components of Cyber Graduate School

원격대학원 콘텐츠 구성요소에 대한 중요도-수행도 분석: J대학 원격대학원 사례를 중심으로

  • Received : 2022.01.10
  • Accepted : 2022.02.20
  • Published : 2022.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the importance-performance analysis (IPA) of the content components of remote graduate students was conducted. To this end, an online survey of 221 remote graduate students at J University obtained the following results. First, the importance of content components by area was in the order of learning content, interaction, teaching-learning strategy, and evaluation, and the degree of execution was in the order of teaching-learning strategy, interaction, evaluation, and learning content. Second, it was found that there were significant differences between importance and performance in the four areas of content components: learning content, teaching-learning strategy, interaction, and evaluation. The importance-execution analysis (IPA) was conducted in two dimensions: region-specific and item-specific, and the results are as follows. The learning content was found to be the maintenance area, the teaching-learning strategy and interaction were the key improvement areas, and the evaluation area was the overinvestment area. The results of this study can be used as basic data to diagnose the present of remote graduate school content and to gauge what needs to be improved in the future based on it.

이 연구에서는 원격대학원생 콘텐츠 구성요소에 대한 중요도-수행도 분석(IPA)을 하였다. 이를 위해 J대학 원격대학원생 221명을 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 한 결과 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 첫째, 콘텐츠 구성요소의 영역별 중요도는 학습 내용, 상호작용, 교수-학습 전략, 평가의 순으로, 수행도는 교수-학습 전략, 상호작용, 평가, 학습내용의 순으로 나타났다. 둘째, 콘텐츠 구성요소 4가지 영역, 즉 학습내용, 교수-학습 전략, 상호작용, 평가 영역 모두 중요도와 수행도 간에 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 중요도-수행도 분석(IPA)은 영역별 및 항목별 두 차원에서 실시하였는데 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 학습내용은 유지관리 영역으로, 교수-학습 전략과 상호작용은 중점개선 영역으로, 평가 영역은 과잉투자 영역으로 밝혀졌다. 이 연구 결과는 원격대학원 콘텐츠의 현재를 진단하고 그에 기초하여 앞으로 개선해야 할 점이 무엇인가를 가늠하는 데 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by Joongbu University Research & Development Fund, in 2021.

References

  1. Ministry of Education (2001). Authorization for the establishment and operation of a remote graduate school. Seoul: Author.
  2. S. S. Kim. (2021). A survey of college students' satisfaction with remote lectures. Unofficial handouts. Special graduate school, Joongbu university.
  3. Ministry of Education. (2020. 9). A survey on remote classes. handouts. Sejong: Author.
  4. Ministry of Education. (2020. 9). Plans to improve new normal remote education. Sejong: Author.
  5. S. Y. Kim. (2020). Remote education as a new paradigm of university education and university tasks. Happy education, 12(2).
  6. S. R. An. (2015). Explore the educational needs through diagnosis of teaching competency in cyber university. Master's thesis. Graduate school of education, Ewha womans university.
  7. H. H. Park. (2011). Study on importance and performance for e-learning contents cyber university instructor. Master's thesis. Graduate school of education, Kyungpook National University.
  8. U. J. Jang. (2007). 2006 Development State-funded Remote University Content Satisfaction Survey. Research Report of the Korea Educational Research, Information Service CR 2007-8.
  9. H. J. Lee & Y. I. Hong. (2010). A study on learner-centered usability evaluation method for quality management of e-learning content development. Asian journal of education, 11(1), 89-95.
  10. S. T. Lee. (2010). Strategy for developing game-type e-learning contents using secondary life (SL) elements. The Journal of Korean Design and Culture, 16(4), 100-107.
  11. S. Y. Jang & S. Z. Roh. (2009). Factors influencing the quality of e-learning contents provided by the universities at the learners' perspectives. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 10(3), 203-210.
  12. J. H. Leem, B. R. Lim & E. M. Sung. (2014). Developmental Study on the Quality Certification Standards of Smart Education Contents. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 20(3), 209-216.
  13. H. J. Lee & K. S. Park. (2009). A Strategy of Learner-Centered Usability Evaluation for Quality Management in e-Learning Contents Development. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(3), 180-187.
  14. Y. J. Joo & N. Y. Kim. (2008). Development of measurement tools and verification of good quality for course evaluation at cyber universities. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 12(1), 203-209.
  15. I. S. Lee. (2018). Proposal on the improvement direction of design course evaluation in cyber universities: Focus on 'S' University case. Journal of Communication Design, 64, 34-42.
  16. H. H. Park. (2011). Study on importance and performance for e-learning contents cyber university instructor. Graduate school of education, Kyungpook National University.
  17. Korea U Learning Federation (2021). E-learning Content Quality Certification Evaluation Criteria. Seoul: Author.
  18. Korea Educational Research Information Service (2021). Content evaluation criteria. Daegu: Author.
  19. J. H. Lee & S. W. Back. (2018). A Study on the Quality Management Strategy of Scientific Cultural Contents. Journal of Creative Information Culture, 4(2), 88-96.
  20. J. H. Leem. (2014). Developmental Study on the Quality Certification Standards of Smart Education Contents. Education information media research, 20(3), 56-65.
  21. I. S. Lee. (2018). Proposal on the Improvement Direction of Design Course Evaluation in Cyber Universities: Focus on 'S' University Case. Communication design research, 64, 140-149.
  22. J. A. Martilla & J. C. James. (1997). Improtance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
  23. C Y. hung, K. J. Lee & KS. K. im. (2014). A study of utilizing IPA in urban geriatric hospital choice factor. Health & Social Welfare Review, 34(1), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2014.34.1.133
  24. Ministry of Education. (2021). Criteria for approval of online degree courses at general university. Sejong: Author.