디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.431-446
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

통합된 사회인지진로이론을 적용한 장애인 근로자의 주관적 안녕감 예측 모형

Predicting Subjective Well-being of Workers With Disabilities Using Integrated Social Cognitive Career Theory

  • Kim, Do-Hee (Dept. of Education, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.18
  • 심사 : 2022.02.20
  • 발행 : 2022.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 장애인 근로자의 주관적 안념감을 예측하고, 개선 방안을 모색하기 위하여 통합된 사회인지진로이론의 적용 가능성을 조사하였다. 연구 참여자는 2016년부터 2018년까지 장애인 고용패널조사에 참여한 근로자 중에서 3년 동안 계속 근로중인 만 18세 이상의 성인 952명이다. SPSS와 AMOS 프로그램을 사용하여 직업 만족과 삶의 만족의 종단적인 관계에 대한 교차지연 패널 모형을 분석하고, 장애수용이 직업적 자기효능감, 직업 만족, 삶의 만족에 영향을 미치는 직접효과와 직업적 자기효능감을 거쳐서 직업 만족에 영향을 미치는 간접효과의 유의성을 검토하였다. 연구결과, 장애수용은 직업적 자기효능감과 직업 만족 및 삶의 만족에 유의한 정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 직업적 자기효능감은 직업 만족과 장애수용의 관계를 부분 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 아울러 장애수용과 직업 만족 간의 자기회기 효과와 교차지연 효과 모두 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 이는 장애수용과 직업적 자기효능감이 장애인 임금근로자의 주관적 안녕감을 높이기 위한 중요한 지표로 고려될 수 있음을 시사한다.

This study tested the possibility of applying the integrated social cognitive career theory for workers with disabilities to explore ways of predicting and enhancing their subjective well-being. It analyzed 952 adults who were employed for three years, among the workers who had participated in the Panel Survey of Employment for the Disabled from 2016 to 2018. The results showed that disability acceptance was positively related to occupational self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction with statistical significance, and that occupational self-efficacy had a partial mediating effect on the relationship between job satisfaction and disability acceptance. Moreover, both auto-regressive and cross-lagged effects between disability acceptance and job satisfaction were found to be statistically significant. These findings imply that disability acceptance and occupational self-efficacy can be regarded as important factors to increase the subjective well-being of workers with disabilities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. B. Gannon & M. Munley. (2009). Age and disability: explaining the wage differential. Social Science & Medicine, 69(1), 47-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.013
  2. S. Mitra & U. Sambamoorthi. (2009). Wage differential by disability status in an agrarian labour market in India. Applied Economics Letters, 16(14), 1393-1398. DOI: 10.1080/13504850802047011
  3. L. A. Snyder, J. S. Carmichael, L. V. Blackwell, J. N. Cleveland & G. C. Thornton. (2010). Perceptions of discrimination and justice among employees with disabilities. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 22(1), 5-19. DOI: 10.1007/s10672-009-9107-5
  4. Ministry of health and welfare (2017). National Survey on Persons with Disabilities, 2017. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  5. Korea Employment Agency for Persons with Disabilities. (2021). 2020 Employment Panel Survey for the Disabled (2nd Wave 5th Survey). Seongnam: KEAD.
  6. J. S. Jeong. (2016). A study on the causes affecting the unemployment of working disabled. Disability & Employment, 26(3), 177-205. DOI: 10.15707/disem.2016.26.3.007
  7. T. A. Judge & S. Watanabe. (1993). Another look at the job satisfaction-life satisfaction relationship, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 939-948. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.939
  8. J. Peng, D. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Tian, D. Miao, W. Xiao & J. Zhang. (2016). How can core self-evaluations influence job burnout? the key roles of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(1), 50-59. DOI: 10.1177/1359105314521478
  9. A. Raziq & R. Maulabakhsh. (2015). Impact of working environment on job satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 717-725. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00524-9
  10. E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1
  11. R. W. Lent. (2004). Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 482-509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.482
  12. F. R. Goodman, D. J. Disabato, T. B. Kashdan & S. B. Kauffman. (2018). Measuring well-being: a comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 321-332. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.482
  13. R. W. Lent & S. D. Brown. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and subjective well-being in the context of work, Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 6-21. DOI: 10.1177/1069072707305769
  14. A. Bandura. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  15. R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown & G. Hackett. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  16. S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent. (2017). Social cognitive career theory in a diverse world: closing thoughts. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 173-180. DOI: 10.1177/1069072716660061
  17. P. F. Foley & M. C. Lytle, (2015). Social cognitive career theory, the theory of work adjustment, and work satisfaction of retirement-age adults. Journal of Career Development, 42(3), 199-214. DOI: 10.1177/0894845314553270
  18. K. A. Jang & J. Y. Lee. (2014). Verification of a structural model of the relations between Korean high school student's career variables and their life satisfaction: application of integrated social cognitive career model. Korean Journal Of Counseling And Psychotherapy, 26(4), 1023-1046.
  19. M. Y. Jung & N. K. Cho. (2012). A structural model of subjective well-being on the social cognitive career theory. Korea Journal of Counseling, 13(2), 401-415. DOI: 10.15703/kjc.13.2.201204.401
  20. Y. Guo. (2016). Generalizing of Integrated Social Cognitive Career Theory for Job Satisfaction: An empirical evidence from the analysis of Korean working women's data. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  21. J. S. Kim. (2017). Verifying social cognitive career theory integrated model for elementary school teachers' work satisfaction. Master's thesis, Gyeongin National University of Education.
  22. S. J. Lim & J. W. Lee. (2011). A causality analysis on factors in life satisfaction of the disabled workers. Disability & Employment, 21(1), 115-142. DOI: 10.15707/disem.2011.21.1.005
  23. H. J. Cho, J. K. Park & L. E. Park. (2015). An Exploratory study on the factors influencing on life satisfaction of workers with physical disabilities. Korean Journal of Physical, Multiple, & Health Disabilities, 58(2), 203-227. DOI: 10.20971/kcpmd.2015.58.2.203
  24. P. Bialowolski & D. Weziak-Bialowolska. (2021). Longitudinal evidence for reciprocal effects between life satisfaction and job satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(3), 1287-1312. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-020-00273-1
  25. J. C. Rode. (2004). Job satisfaction and life satisfaction revisited: a longitudinal test of an integrated model. Human Relations, 57(9), 1205-1230. DOI: 10.1177/0018726704047143
  26. Y. Park, D. G. Seo, J. Park, E. Bettini & J. Smith. (2016). Predictors of job satisfaction among individuals with disabilities: an analysis of South Korea's national survey of employment for the disabled. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 53, 198-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.02.009
  27. K. R. Bogart. (2014). The role of disability self-concept in adaptation to congenital or acquired disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(1), 107-115. DOI: 10.1037/a0035800
  28. M. Miyahara, D. Rigoli & J. P. Piek. (2015). Physical disability and self-esteem, In R. Levesque, (Eds). Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Switzerland: Springer.
  29. A. J. Forber-Pratt, & M. P. Zape. (2017). Disability identity development model: voices from the ADA-generation, Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 350-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.013
  30. S. W. Lee, S. R. Park & J. M. Lee. (2019). The relationship between acceptance of disability & job satisfaction of wage earners with acquired physical disabilities: testing the moderated mediating effect of person-job fit through self-efficacy. Journal of Disability and Welfare, 46, 29-58. DOI: 10.22779/kadw.2019.46.46.29
  31. J. Y. Kim. (2021). The effect of experiencing discrimination on the life satisfaction of people with disabilities in south korea: the mediating role of disability acceptance. Social Work in Public Health, 36(2), 276-285. DOI: 10.1080/19371918.2021.1875948
  32. N. Ditchman, C. Sung, A. B. Easton, K. S. Johnson & E. Batchos. (2017). Symptom severity and life satisfaction in brain injury: the mediating role of disability acceptance and social self-efficacy. NeuroRehabilitation, 40(4), 531-543. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-171440
  33. J. Barlow, C. Wright & L. Cullen. (2002). A Job-seeking self-efficacy scale for people with physical disabilities: preliminary development and psychometric testing. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 30(1), 37-53. DOI: 10.1080/030698880220106500
  34. R. W. Lent & G. Hackett. (1987). Career self-efficacy: empirical status and future directions, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30(3), 347-382. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(87)90010-8
  35. J. Raelin, R. Reisberg & D. Whitman. (2011). The effect of cooperative education on change in self-efficacy among undergraduate students: introducing work self-efficacy. Journal of Cooperative Education & Internships, 45(2), 17-35.
  36. D. O. O'Sullivan, D. R. Strauser & A. W. Wong. (2012). Five-factor model of personality, work behavior self-efficacy, and length of prior employment for individuals with disabilities: an exploratory analysis. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55(3), 156-165. DOI: 10.1177/0034355212437046
  37. D. H. Kim. (2021). Structural relationship between discrimination experience, disability acceptance, self-esteem, occupational self-efficacy, career aspirations, career preparation behavior of job seekers with physical disabilities and/or brain lesions. Disability & Employment, 31(2), 5-24. DOI: 10.15707/disem.2021.31.2.001
  38. J. M. Kwon. (2017). Effect of barista job training game on occupational self efficacy of persons with intellectual disability. Journal of Korea Game Society, 17(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2017.17.1.63
  39. D. W. Russell, J. H. Kahn, R. Spoth & E. M. Altmaier. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: a latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(1), 18-29. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.45.1.18
  40. R. H. Perry, B. Charlotte, M. Isabella & C. S. Bob. (2004). SPSS Explained. Abingdon. UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
  41. R. M. Kuiper & O. Ryan. (2018). Drawing conclusions from cross-lagged relationships: re-considering the role of the time-interval. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(5), 809-823. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1431046
  42. S. Macho & T. Ledermann. (2011). Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: the phantom model approach. Psychological Methods, 16(1), 34-43. DOI: 10.1037/a0021763
  43. L. T. Hu & P. M. Bentler. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  44. J. C. Anderson & D. W. Gerbing. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  45. C. Fornell & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104
  46. R. W. Lent & S. D. Brown. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557-568. DOI: 10.1037/a0033446
  47. D. H. Kim. (2019). An exploration on the application of disability-affirmative therapy for development of disability identity in rehabilitation psychology field. Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Psychology, 26(2), 53-74. DOI: 10.35734/karp.2019.26.2.004