DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Alternatives to Improving the Curriculum of Teacher Training Institutions to Enhance Future Responsiveness

미래 대응력 제고를 위한 교원양성기관의 교육과정 개선 방안

  • Shin, Min-Hye (Department of Physical Education, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Yong (Major in Physical Education, Graduate School of Education, Kyonggi University)
  • 신민혜 (원광대학교 체육교육과) ;
  • 김승용 (경기대학교 교육대학원 체육교육전공)
  • Received : 2021.11.26
  • Accepted : 2022.02.20
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to strengthen the practicality of preliminary teachers in preparation for future education, to respond to structural changes in the teacher training system due to a decrease in the school-age population, and to seek a future-oriented direction for the curriculum of teacher training institutions. To this end, we analyzed the competency diagnosis items of the teacher training institutes in the 5th cycle from 2019 to 2020, and based on the proposal for the development plan for the teacher training system announced by the Ministry of Education in July 2021 and the contents of the 4 discussions, content was presented. The results were as follows. First, to nurture creative and convergence-type talents, teacher training institutions need to develop multi-curricular competency and reorganize the curriculum into a future-oriented curriculum. Second, in order to foster the competence of teachers and preliminary teachers in teacher training institutions, it is essential to strengthen the competence of teachers through the introduction of the metaverse, general teaching methods, and ICT-using teaching methods. Third, teachers' training institutions will introduce and strengthen the 'education practice teacher homeroom system' to strengthen school field-oriented practical competencies, 'dedicated mentor-mentee' centered on seniors and juniors, 'monitoring system' led by university professors, and 'probationary teacher system'

본 연구의 목적은 미래 교육에 대비하여 예비 교사의 현장성을 강화하고, 학령기 인구 감소로 인한 교원양성체제의 구조적인 변화 대응 및 교원양성기관의 교육과정에 대한 미래 지향적 방향성을 모색하고자 하는 데 있다. 이를 위해 2019년~2020년 5주기 교원양성기관 역량진단 항목을 분석하였으며, 2021년 7월 교육부에서 발표한 교원양성체제 발전방안 시안 및 4차에 걸친 토론회 내용에 근거하여 미래 교원양성기관의 교육과정에 대한 내용을 제시하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 창의·융합형 인재 양성을 위하여 교원양성기관에서는 다(多) 교과 역량 함양과 미래형 교육과정으로의 개편이 필요하다. 둘째, 교원양성기관의 교원과 예비 교사에 대한 역량 함양을 위해 메타버스의 도입, 일반교수법, ICT 활용 교수법 등을 통한 교수자 역량 강화가 필수적으로 요구된다. 셋째, 교원양성기관에서는 예비 교사양성을 위해 학교 현장 중심의 실무역량 강화를 위한 '교육실습생 교사 담임제', 선후배 중심 '전담 멘토-멘티', 대학 교수자 주도의 '모니터링 시스템', '수습 교사제' 등의 도입 및 강화이다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. H. Shin. (2017). Exploration of coordination among admission, education, career development for sustainment of dance department in korea. The Korean Journal of Dance Studies, 63(1), 67-85. DOI : 10.16877/kjds.63.1.201703.67
  2. H. I. Jeong, & S. Y. Chin. (2017). Study on teacher education system in graduate school of education. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 34(1), 149-173. DOI : 10.24211/tjkte.2017.34.1.149
  3. W. K. Song, & Y. K. Song. (2021). An analysis of change in efficiency of department of early childhood education in KOREA. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, (22)5, 517-529. DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2021.22.5.517
  4. K. S. Kim. (2021). Review of research trends related to the reform of the teacher training system. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 49-67. DOI : 10.14333/KJTE.2020.37.1.03
  5. K. Y. Song. (2004). "Issues and directions in redesigning teacher education system: A contents perspective", Issues and directions in redesigning teacher education system. proceeding of the 42nd spring conference. The Korean Society for the Study of Teacher Education, (42), 42-65.
  6. H. S. Shin. (2001). An analysis of issues = Government plans for improving conditions in education and teacher supply and demand policy. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 18(3), 151-172.
  7. B. H. Lee, & K. U. Chung. (2015). A policy research on a reorganization of the secondary teachers' education system. Journal of Law and Politics Research, 15(2), 611-629. DOI : 10.17926/kaolp.2015.15.2.611
  8. J. Y. Chung. (2019). Issues and responses in the secondary school teacher's education. The Journal of Liberal Arts, 6(1), 43-66.
  9. H. S. Shin. (2009). Policy directions and strategies to reform pre-service education of teachers. Journal of Korean Education, 36(3), 53-78. DOI : 10.22804/jke.2009.36.3.003
  10. Korea Educational Development Institute. (2019). 2019-2020 5th cycle teacher training institute competency diagnosis handbook. Ministry of Education.
  11. Korea Educational Development Institute. (2021). A plan to develop a system for nurturing elementary and middle school teachers to enhance field performance and future responsiveness. Public Hearing Resources.
  12. R. Matthews. & E. Ross. (2010). Research Methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. London: Pearson Education.
  13. Korea Educational Development Institute. (2021). Method of calculating points. https://necte.kedi.re.kr/score.do
  14. J. Y. Chung, K. S. Kim, T. H. Kang, S. C. Ryoo, H. J. Yun, & M. S. Sun. (2014). A needs assessment analysis of new teacher's job competence in secondary school. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 31(4), 373-396. DOI : 10.24211/tjkte.2014.31.4.373
  15. H. S. Kim. (2003). Teacher expertise and quality: exploration of concepts and improvement strategies. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 93-114.
  16. J. Y. Chung, & B. H. Oh. (2007). A Study on improvement of teacher certificate management system. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 24(2), 61-80. DOI : 10.24211/tjkte.2007.24.2.61
  17. J. B. Kim. (2004). Innovating teacher education system for educational development. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 21(3), 29-47. UCI : G704-000867.2004.21.3.008
  18. M. J. Chung, & J. Y. Chung. (2012). An analysis of the teaching practice effects on the competencies of pre-service teacher. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 29(4), 63-83. DOI : 10.24211/tjkte.2012.29.4.63
  19. M. K. Chung, K. S. Kim, S. C. Ryoo, B. C. Kim, & S. W. Park. (2011). Elementary and secondary school teachers' demands for teacher education curriculum reform, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 28(3), 287-306. DOI : 10.24211/tjkte.2011.28.3.287