References
- Kwon, N., & Min, Y. (2003). The effects of questioning types on academic achievement by cognitive styles. Korean As ociation for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 6, 171-190.
- Kong, H. (2018). A study on the analysis of teachers' questions in the korean classroom for academic purposes-focusing on problem-based instruction. The Society of Korean Language Education, 29(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.18209/iakle.2018.29.3.1
- Kim, D. (2007). Overcoming framing-difference between teacher and students: An analysis of argumentation in mathematics classroom. The Mathematical Education, 46(2), 173-192.
- Kim, M., & Song, S. (2011). Analysis on teacher's discourse in math gifted class in elementary schools using Flanders interaction analysis program. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 15(2), 385-415.
- Kim, S. (2017). A Study on the teachers' questioning type in the lesson scripts. The Convergent Research Society Among Humanities, Sociology, Science, and Technology, 7(12), 205-216.
- Kim, S., & Pang, J. (2010). An analysis of mathematics instruction focused on discourse-based communication. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523-545.
- Kim, Y. (2017). An analysis of teacher questions presented in the elementary English school teachers' guide based on the 2009 revised national curriculum. The Korea English Education Society, 16(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.18649/jkees.2017.16.1.107
- Kim, J. (2015). A study on the development of the classroom assessment tool for primary teaching English in English: Focus on classroom interaction. Primary English Education, 21(4), 223-245.
- Do, J. (2021). An analysis of types and functions of questions presented in data and chance area of elementary school mathematics textbooks. The Mathematical Education, 60(3), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2021.60.3.265
- Park, D. (2008). Inquiry into directions of classroom discourse analysis through Bakhtin's dialogicality. The Korean Society for the Study of Anthropology of Education, 11(1), 37-72.
- Lee, Y. (2007). Redesigning time-lined structure diagram analysis and active learning time diagram analysis for the consulting and self-analysis of teaching. The Korea As ociation of Yeolin Education, 15(2), 21-49.
- Jeon, J. (2019). The types and utilization of questions by grade cluster through the analysis of primary English classes. Studies in Foreign Language Education, 33(3), 227-259. https://doi.org/10.16933/sfle.2019.33.3.227
- Cho, Y., & Shin, H. (2010). Analysis of pattern of mathematical interaction occurring in the elementary school mathematics classrooms. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 14(3), 681-700.
- Cho, H., & Kwon, O., & Bae, Y. (2014). Analyzing research trend of interaction in mathematics classroom in Korea. Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction, 14(6), 363-387.
- Han, S., & Jung, J. (2011). Classroom discourse analysis between teacher and students in science classroom. Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 159-172.
- Choi, M. (2004). A study of the educational beliefs of early childhood teachers according to career and type of institute. The Korean Society for Early Childho d Education, 24(1), 29-47.
- Hwang, P., & Sung M. (2020). Classroom discourses in primary English 6th-Grade teachers' guides. Korea Insti ute for Cur iculum and Evaluation, 23(4), 19-38.
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2010). 교육의 질적 연구방법론. (조정수, 역). 경문사. (원문 출판 2007).
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2010). Qualitative research education: A introduction to theories and methods. (Cho, C. Trans). Kyung Moon Sa. (Original work published in 2015).
- Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2010). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: Perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 265-287.
- Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- DeJarnette, A. F., Wilke, E., & Hord, C. (2020). Categorizing mathematics teachers' questioning: The demands and contributions of teachers' questions. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 1-20.
- Delice, A., Aydin, E., & Cevik, K. S. (2013). Mathematics teachers' use of questions: Is there a change of practice after the curriculum change? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(4), 417-427.
- Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
- Fan, L., Wong, N. Y., Cai, J., & Li, S. (Eds.). (2004). How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.
- Fazio, L. K. (2019). Retrieval practice opportunities in middle school mathematics teachers' oral questions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 653-669. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12250
- Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225-256). Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Hiebert, J., Callimore, R., Garnier, H., Givving, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., & Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMMSS 1999 video study. National Center for Education Statistics.
- Imm, K., & Stylianou, D. A. (2012). Talking mathematically: An analysis of discourse communities. J ournal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 130-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.10.001
- Long, M. H., & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teacher questions. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long(Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268-285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
- Manouchehri, A., & Lapp, D. A. (2003). Unveiling student understanding: The role of questioning in instruction. Mathematics Teacher, 96(8), 562-566. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.96.8.0562
- Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. Van Dijk(Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 119-131). London: Academic Press.
- Nathan, M. J., & Kim, S. (2009). Regulation of teacher elicitations in the mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 91-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000902797304
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
- Neber, H. (2008). Epistemic questions: Fostering knowledge-generation by the students. The Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving. 18(1), 7-20.
- Ni, Y., Zhou, D., Li, X., & Li, Q. (2014). Relations of instructional tasks to teacher-student discourse in mathematics classrooms of Chinese primary schools. Cognition and Instruction, 32(1), 2-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.857319
- Reinholz, D. L., & Shah, N. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for quantifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 140-177. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0140
- Sahin, A., & Kulm, G. (2008). Sixth grade mathematics teachers' intentions and use of probing, guiding, and factual questions. J ournal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(3), 221-2412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9071-2
- Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560127
- Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Spradley, J. P. (2006). Participant observation (Shin, J. Trans). Sigma Press.(Original work published in 1980).
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 272-285). Sage.
- Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. The University of Hong Kong.
- Wood, T. (1998). Funneling or focusing? Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics class. In H. Steinbring, M. G. Bussi, A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167-178). NCTM.