The Korean Journal of Archival Studies (기록학연구)

  • Issue 71
  • /
  • Pages.5-48
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-7941(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-7891(eISSN)
Korea Society of Archival Studies (한국기록학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research Trends and Issues of Appraisal of Digital Records : Focused on Datasets and Websites

전자기록 평가의 동향과 과제 데이터세트와 웹사이트 평가를 중심으로

  • 현문수 (부산대학교 사회과학연구원)
  • Received : 2021.12.31
  • Accepted : 2022.01.19
  • Published : 2022.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explored recent discussions, experiments, and case studies related to the appraisal of digital records, which was focused on datasets and websites. Based on this, it proposed what issues should be addressed for developing appraisal policies. To this end, it categorized appraisal criteria that can be applied to digital records, examined the arguments that in the digital environment total retention is necessary in the era of big data, and that selective retention is still necessary, based on the literature review. Subsequently, after analyzing case studies conducted on datasets and websites, the study dealt with what discussions should be made in terms of targets, tools, objectives of appraisal, and roles/responsibilities which used to develop appraisal policy. This study addressed the following questions to reveal current debates and challenges; First, what appraisal criteria can be applied to digital records in general; second, is the appraisal activities still necessary in the era of digital environment and big data; third, what are the results that case studies produced for the appraisal of digital records; fourth, what changes are expected in the future regarding the appraisal. Based on these questions, it tried to reveal the main issues necessary to develop the appraisal policies that can be applied to various types of digital records created in the public domain.

이 연구에서는, 특히 데이터세트와 웹사이트 유형을 중심으로 하여, 전자기록의 평가와 관련한 최근의 논의와 실험적 사례연구 및 적용 사례, 향후 평가 방향 설정을 위한 과제 영역을 드러냈다. 이를 위해, 전자기록에 적용할 수 있는 평가 기준을 범주화하고, 디지털 환경에 대응하려면 총체적 보유가 필요하다는 주장과 여전히 평가가 필요하다는 주장을 살펴보았다. 이어서, 데이터세트와 웹사이트를 대상으로 진행된 국내외 평가 사례연구를 분석한 후, 미래의 평가정책 방향 모색을 위해 대상과 사용될 도구, 목적 및 역할의 측면에서 어떤 논의가 이루어져야 할 것인지 다루어 보았다.현재의 논의와 과제를 드러내기 위해 이 연구가 다루는 주요 질문은 첫째, 일반적으로 전자기록에 대해서는 어떤 평가 기준이 적용될 수 있는가, 둘째, 평가는 디지털 환경 및 빅데이터 활용 시대에 여전히 필요한 활동인가, 셋째, 전자기록의 평가를 위해 진행되고 있는 실험은 어떤 방향을 지시하고 있는가, 넷째, 미래의 평가는 어떻게 변화할 것인가 등이다. 이 질문들을 바탕으로 하여, 다양하게 논의되는 방향과 쟁점, 과제 등을 드러냈으며, 향후 우리의 공공영역에서 생산되는 다양한 유형의 전자기록을 대상으로 진행될 평가정책 방향을 정의하는 데 필요한 주요 쟁점을 드러내려 하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2018년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2018S1A5A2A03036149).

References

  1. 김유승 (2019). 디지털 시대의 공공기록평가에 관한 정책적 고찰: 영국 TNA 사례를 중심으로. 기록학연구, 62, 5-39. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.62.005
  2. 설문원 (2018). 공공기관의 책임성 강화를 위한 기록평가제도의 재설계. 기록학연구, 55, 5-38. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2018.55.005
  3. 설문원, 이승억 (2020). 공공기록 평가제도의 구조와 쟁점. 한국기록관리학회지, 20(1), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.1.047
  4. 신동희 (2020). 생산부터 보존까지 기록관리 전반에서 이해하는 기록평가: 미국 뉴욕주기록관의 사례 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 20(1), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.1.177
  5. 왕호성 (2021. 12. 28). 줌(zoom)에서 저자와의 인터뷰 [줌(zoom) 원격 인터뷰].
  6. 이경남, 최광훈, 임진희 (2021). 데이터세트 기록관리를 위한 기록관의 역할 연구: KR 사업관리시스템 사례를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 36(3), 263-285.
  7. 이경래 (2019). 공공기록 평가의 책임과 권한의 분배: '시민참여 평가'를 중심으로. 기록학연구, 60, 49-88. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.049
  8. 이경래 (2020). 시민참여형 평가의 실천적 설계를 위한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 20(2), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.2.021
  9. 이승억, 설문원 (2021). 디지털 정보기술 환경에서 보존기록 평가론의 전환. 기록학연구, 67, 57-97.
  10. 전보배, 설문원 (2019). 기록 평가에 관한 국제표준의 적용방안 분석: ISO 15489-1과 ISO/TR 21946을 중심으로. 한국기록관리학회지, 19(4), 115-137. https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2019.19.4.115
  11. 한국기록학회 (2008). 기록학 용어 사전. 서울: 역사비평사.
  12. 현문수 (2019). 국가기록평가의 권한과 책임 분석: 영국, 미국, 캐나다, 호주 중앙 및 연방정부 기록의 평가를 중심으로. 한국기록관리학회지, 19(4), 175-209. https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2019.19.4.175
  13. 현문수 (2021). 국가기록평가의 관점에서 본 환경 분야 기록관리기준표 분석. 기록학연구, 67, 139-203.
  14. Blair, B. (2015). Why we are moving to a world where we will keep everything forever. Available: www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-we-moving-world-where-keep-everything-forever-barclay-t-blair.
  15. boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for bit data - Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication and Society, 15(5), 662-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
  16. Brown, A. (2006). Archiving website: a practical guide for information management professional. Facet Publishing, 24-41. 재인용: Shenkolewski-Kroll, S. & Tractinsky, A. (2015). EU01-Research on retention and disposition processes in an internet website of the Government of Israel: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs case study. Final paper. (July 7, 2015), 9.
  17. Cook, T. (1991). 'Many are called, but few are chosen'? Appraisal guidelines for sampling and selecting case files. Archivaria, 32, 25-50.
  18. Cox, R. (2011). Appraisal and the future of archives in the digital era. In Hill, J. ed. The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping. Facet Publishing, 213-237.
  19. Cunningham, A. (2008). Digital curation/digital archiving: A view from the National Archives of Australia. American Archivist, 71(2), 530-543. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507
  20. Cunningham, A. (2016). Describing Archives in Context: Peter J. Scott and the Australian 'Series' System. In Lemieux, V. ed. Building Trust in Information, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer International Publishing, 49-57.
  21. Dale, K. (2015). RIM's role in harnessing the power of big data. Information Management, 49(4), 29-32.
  22. Duranti, L. (2011). Structural and formal analysis: The contribution of diplomatics to archival appraisal in the digital environment. In Hill, J. ed. The Future of Archives Record Keeping. Facet Publishing, 65-88,
  23. Duranti, L. (2015). Archival bond. In Duranti, L. and Franks, P.C. eds. Encyclopedia of Archival Science. Rowman & Littlefield.
  24. Eaker, C. (2016). Selection and appraisal of digital research datasets. In Kellam, L. & Thompson, K. eds. Databrarianship: The Academic Data Librarian in Theory and Practice. American Library Association, 245-258. Available: https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1018&context=utk_libpub
  25. Franks, P., Doyle, A., Nobrega, L., Morrison, J. & Wilson, L. (2016). Retention & disposition in a cloud environment. InterPARES Trust final paper. Available: https://interparestrust.org/assets/public/dissemination/NA06_20160902_RetentionDispositionInCloud_FinalReport_Final.pdf
  26. Franks, P. (2017). Even in a 'Never delete anything world' compliant information disposition has its place. Information Management Journal, 51(6), 45-46.
  27. Franks, P. (2019). Retention and Disposition. In L. Duranti & C. Rogers eds. Trusting Records and Data in the Cloud: The Creation, Management, and Preservation of Trustworthy Digital Content. Facet, 117-134 [e-book].
  28. Gilliland, A. (2014). Archival appraisal: Practising on shifting sands. In Brown, C. ed. Archives and Recordkeeping: Theory into Practice. Facet Publishing, 31-61.
  29. Ham, G. (1993). Selecting and Appraising Archives and Manuscripts. 강경무, 김상민 번역 (2002). 아카이브와 매뉴스크립트의 선별과 평가. 서울: 진리탐구.
  30. Harvey, R. (2008). Appraisal and Selection. DCC Briefing Papers: Introduction to Curation. Available: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/briefing-papers/introduction-curation/appraisal-and-selection
  31. Jenkinson, H. (1922). A Manual of Archive Administration. 정부기록보존소 번역(2003). 힐러리 젠킨슨의 기록관리편람. 서울: 정부기록보존소.
  32. Larson, E. (2020). Big questions: Digital preservation of big data in government. The American Archivist, 83(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-83.1.5
  33. Leahy, E. and Cameron, C. (1965). Modern Records Management. McGraw-Hill, 228. 재인용: Yeo, G. (2018). Can we keep everything? The future of appraisal in a world of digital profusion. In Brown, C. ed. Archival Future (pp. 45-63). London: Facet Publishing, 46.
  34. Loukissas, Y. (2017). Taking big data apart: Local readings of composite media collections. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1211722
  35. McDonald, J. & Leveille, V. (2014). Whither the retention schedule in the era of big data and open data? Records Management Journal, 24(2), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-01-2014-0010
  36. McKinsey Global Institute (2016). The age of analytics: Competing in a data-driven world. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/public%20and%20social%20sector/our%20insights/the%20age%20of%20analytics%20competing%20in%20a%20data%20driven%20world/mgi-the-age-of-analytics-full-report.pdf
  37. Ministry of Defence (2020). Appraisal report: Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces 1963-2020. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-defence-records-appraisal-report-2020
  38. NAA [n.d.a]. Archiving australian government websites. Available https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/disposing-information/transferring-information/archiving-australian-government-websites
  39. NAA [n.d.b]. Managing social media. Available: https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/types-information-and-systems/types-information/managing-social-media
  40. Petrov, C. (2021). 25+ impressive big data statistics for 2021. Available: https://techjury.net/blog/big-data-statistics/
  41. Rocha, C. L., Claudino, F. C. D., Gonaleves, A., Corbo, D. A. S., Costa, F. M. (2017). LA 01 - Preserving records and managing their lifecycle in a multi-provenance digital government environment - A case study on government electronic system: SIGEPE. InterPARES Trust Project Report. Available: https://interparestrust.org/assets/public/dissemination/IPT_LA01_Report_eng_2017.pdf
  42. SAA [n.d.]. Dictionary of Archives Terminology. Available: https://dictionary.archivists.org/
  43. Serewicz, L.W. (2010). Do we need bigger buckets or better search engines? The challenges of unlimited storage and semantic web search for records management. Records Management Journal, 20(2), 172-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011064313
  44. Shenkolewski-Kroll, S. & Tractinsky, A. (2015). EU01-Research on retention and disposition processes in an internet website of the Government of Israel: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs case study. Final paper. (July 7, 2015). Available: https://interparestrust.org/assets/public/dissemination/EU01_20150909_RetentionDispositionProcessesIsraeliForeignAffairs_FinalReport_Final.pdf
  45. Shenkolewski-Kroll, S. & Tractinsky, A. (2017). EU36-Archival Appraisal, Retention Schedules and Metadata in Web Sites - The Case Study of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Israel. Final paper. (November 20, 2017). Available: https://interparestrust.org/assets/public/dissemination/EU036_20171120_AppraisalWebsites_FinalReport.pdf
  46. Tanselle, T. G. (2002). The librarians' double-cross. Raritan; New Brunswick, 21(4), 245-263. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/203865559?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
  47. TNA (2012). Records collection policy. Available: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/records-collection-policy.pdf
  48. TNA (2013). How to compile an appraisal report: Guidance on completing the Appraisal report template. Available: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/how-to-compile-an-appraisal-report.pdf
  49. TNA (2014). Operational selection policy OSP27: UK central government web estate. Available: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/osp27.pdf
  50. TNA (2021). Using AI for digital records selection in government. Available: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/using-ai-digital-selection-in-government.pdf
  51. Yeo, G. (2012). The conceptual fonds and the physical collection. Archivaria, 73, 43-80.
  52. Yeo, G. (2018). Can we keep everything? The future of appraisal in a world of digital profusion. In Brown, C. ed. Archival Future. London: Facet Publishing, 45-63.
  53. 공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률. 법률 제16661호.
  54. 공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률 시행령. 대통령령 제32223호.
  55. 문헌정보-기록관리-제1부: 개념과 원칙. KS X ISO 15489-1:2016.
  56. Information and documentation - Appraisal for managing records. ISO/TR 21946:2018.