KIPS Transactions on Computer and Communication Systems (정보처리학회논문지:컴퓨터 및 통신 시스템)

Korea Information Processing Society (한국정보처리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Public Order Right Based on Analysis of the Administrative Disposition Results Against the Personal Information Protection Act Violation

개인정보 보호법 위반에 따른 행정처분 결과 분석을 통한 공표명령권 도입 연구 395

  • Received : 2022.08.02
  • Accepted : 2022.09.14
  • Published : 2022.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In case of violation of the Personal Information Protection Act, administrative dispositions will be taken according to the legal standards, and the results will be announced. However, the current method has limitations in its effectiveness as repeated administrative dispositions are increasing despite the announcement by the disclosure system of the Personal Information Protection Act. In this paper, we deploy the introduction of the 'public announcement commandment' against violators by analyzing the administrative disposition results according to the violation of the Personal Information Protection Act. It is able to strengthen the existing disclosure system for self-disclose violations by providing easy recognition to the people about the fact of violation itself against the Personal Information Protection Act. Furthermore, we analyze major industries through the industry groups and violations of laws that were subject to publication, and data published on the results of administrative dispositions for violation of the Personal Information Protection Act. Finally, we propose the legal basis for the 'public announcement commandment' which allows the violator to publish by oneself for the announcement of the fact that the corrective action has been taken.

개인정보 보호법 위반 시 법률 기준에 따라 행정처분을 하고 공표기준에 부합할 경우 이에 대한 결과를 공표하게 된다. 그러나 현재의 방식은 개인정보 보호법의 공표제도에 따라 공표함에도 불구하고 반복적인 행정처분이 증가하고 있어 그 실효성의 한계를 지니고 있다. 본 논문에서는 개인정보 보호법 위반에 따른 행정처분 결과 분석을 통해 기존 공표제도 방식을 강화할 수 있는 위반행위자가 대중의 정보 접근성이 좋은 방식으로 스스로 위반 사실을 공표하게 하는 '공표명령권' 도입에 대한 연구를 수행한다. 이를 위하여 본 논문에서는 기존 방송통신위원회와 행정안전부가 공표한 자료뿐만 아니라, 개인정보보호위원회가 국무총리 산하 중앙행정기관으로 출범한 이후 개인정보보호법 위반으로 인한 행정처분 결과 공표자료를 분석하였다. 또한 공표 대상 산업분야와 위반 법률 조문을 통해 주요 산업분야와 위반 법률 조문을 분석하였으며 개인정보 보호법 공표명령권 도입을 위한 타 법률 사례를 분석하고, 행정청이 공표하는 현행 방식 대신 위반행위자가 '시정조치를 받은 사실에 대한 공표'를 스스로 공표하게 하는 '공표명령권' 시행을 위한 법률적 근거를 제안한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2022년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임(No. 2021R1I1A3046590).

References

  1. S. W. Kang, "Discussion on the main contents and related issues of the Data 3 Act amendment," BFL(Business Finance Law), Vol.102, pp.53-67, 2020.
  2. S. Y. Kim and I. S. Kim, "A study on the priority of personal information safety measure using AHP method: Focus on the defferences between financial company and consignee," The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol.24, No.4, pp.31-48, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7838/JSEBS.2019.24.4.031
  3. Constitutional Court, 2002. 1. 31. 2001Hun-Ba43.
  4. C. H. Kim, "A Study on the Administrative Release," Public Land Law Review, Vol.26, pp.253-286, 2005.
  5. D. H. Kim, "Administrative Law," Parkyoungsa, 2016.
  6. Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, Disclosure of real name of company that violates the Personal Information Protection Act [Internet], https://bit.ly/3RKTlYD.
  7. Personal Information Protection Commission, Suwon City Investigation Results Announced on Leaking Personal Information to detective agency(Article No.310) [Internet], https://www.pipc.go.kr/np/cop/bbs/selectBoardList.do?bbsId=BS074&mCode=C020010000.
  8. Ministry of Public Administration and Security [Internet], http://www.mois.go.kr.
  9. Personal Information Protection Commission [Internet], http://www.pipc.go.kr.
  10. Korea Communications Commission [Internet], http://www.kcc.go.kr.
  11. Personal Information Protection Commission, Personal Information Commission, Penalty for Foreign Companies Violating Personal Information Protection Laws(Article No.194) [Internet], https://bit.ly/3KWNixX.
  12. Personal Information Protection Commission, Violation of personal information protection laws, local governments cannot be an exception to sanctions(Article No.200) [Internet], https://bit.ly/3L9Vr2x.
  13. Korea Internet & Security Agency, A survey on the current status of the global personal information protection regulatory system(Article No.6) [Internet], https://www.kisa. or.kr/201/form?postSeq=12055&page=2.
  14. Korea Internet & Security Agency, Personal Information Protection Act Administrative System Status and Major Violations [Internet], https://www.privacy.go.kr/pic/reference Detail.do?idx=86&bbs_type=2.
  15. State of California Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General, Consumer Complaint Against A Business/Company [Internet], https://oag.ca.gov/contact/consumercomplaint-against-business-or-company.
  16. H. Y. Lee, "Legal Issues and Tasks on Regulating the Market-Dominating Enterprise under the Korea Monopoly Regulation Act," The Justice, No.104, pp.75-79, 2008.
  17. Jinsang Yu, Bithumb, who was seized and searched by the police, announces the KCC's corrective order on its website [Internet], http://it.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2018/02/02/2018020285048.html.