DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study of interest in pet food by consumer food choice type

  • Seungjee, Hong (Department of Agricultural Economics, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jaehong, Park (Department of Food Economics and Service, Yeungnam University)
  • Received : 2022.07.18
  • Accepted : 2022.08.19
  • Published : 2022.09.01

Abstract

As the number of households raising pets increases, the pet food industry is also growing. Since pets cannot express their intention explicitly, it appears that the owner's perception mainly affects the selection of products related to pets. In this study, consumers were categorized based on their interest in food choices and the factors influencing their interest in pet food were empirically analyzed. For the analysis, a cluster analysis, factor analysis, and Tobit analysis were conducted using consumer survey data for raising companion animals. The major findings of the study were as follows. As a result of the factor analysis and cluster analysis using questions for consumers' food consumption choices, consumer types were classified into high-interest, low-interest, and practical-seeking types. The degree of interest in pet food was high in the order of high-interest, practical-seeking, and low-interest type. Demographic characteristics such as gender, education, and household type correlate with differences in the degree of interest in pet food, and the food selection criteria of consumers also affect the degree of interest in pet food. These results show that consumers who are more interested in their food choices are more interested in pet food, and this will make possible to know pet owner's purchasing behavior for pet food.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2022년도 영남대학교 학술연구조성비에 의한 것임.

References

  1. Boya UO, Dotson MJ, Hyatt EM. 2012. Dimensions of the dog-human relationship: A segmentation approach. Journal of Targeting, Measurement, and Analysis for Marketing 20:133-143. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2012.8
  2. Boya UO, Dotson MJ, Hyatt EM. 2015. A comparison of dog food choice criteria across dog owner segments: An exploratory study. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39:74-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12145
  3. Cha YB, Rho HY, Hwang JB, Jeon SG. 2020. Analysis beef consumption using SUR. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 47:291-303. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20200020
  4. Chen A, Hung KP, Peng N. 2012. A cluster analysis examination of pet owners' consumption values and behavior-Segmenting owners strategically. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 20:117-132. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2012.10
  5. Clark PW, Page J, Fine MB. 2011. Role model influence on word-of-mouth, loyalty, and switching behaviors of dog owners. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business 4:1-14.
  6. d'Astous A, Deschenes J. 2005. Consuming in one's mind: An exploration. Psychology & Marketing 22:1-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20044
  7. Hong JH, Kim JS, Yu YJ, Lee KH, Cho WS. 2021. Comparison of housewives' agricultural food consumption characteristics by age. The Korean Journal of BigData 6:83-89.
  8. Ji IB, Kim HJ, Kim WT, Seo GC. 2017. Development strategies for the companion animal industry. Korean Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  9. KBMRI (KB Management Research Institute). 2021. 2021 Korea pet report. KBMRI, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  10. Kim HJ, Ji IB, Kim WT, Koo JC, Lee HY. 2019. Analysis on the consumers' preferences for the companion animal feed. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy 46:286-305. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.30805/kjamp.2019.46.3.286
  11. Lee KI, Han HS, Son EY. 2007. Trend of Korean agro-food consumption. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  12. Lee MJ. 2006. More and more consumers are looking for functional pet food. Feed Journal 4:84-86.
  13. Long JS. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  14. Ma SJ. 2004. Pet animal ownership and interaction of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Association of Practical Arts Education 17:191-208. [in Korean]
  15. Maddala GS. 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  16. Park JH. 2018. Analysis of factors influencing the deal proneness of consumers for processed foods. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:533-545. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20180052
  17. Park ME, Um JB. 2021. Consumer characteristics in terms of pet food selection attributes. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development 28:85-98. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12653/JECD.2021.28.2.0085
  18. PetFood News. 2019. Dog owners have difficulty choosing pet food. Accessed in http://www.petfoodindustry.com/articles/5407-survey-dog-ownershave-difficulty-choosing-pet-food on 13 May 2022.
  19. Rosett RN, Nelson FD. 1975. Estimation of the two-limit probit regression model. Econometrica 43:141-146. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913419
  20. Schaffer M. 2009. One nation under dog: Adventures in the new world of prozac-popping puppies, Dog-Park Politics, and Organic Pet Food. Henry Holt and Company, New York, USA.
  21. Schleicher M, Cash SB, Freeman LM. 2019. Determinants of pet food purchasing decisions. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 60:644-650.
  22. Senauer B. 2001. The food consumer in the 21st century: New research perspectives. Working Paper 01-03. The Retail Food Industry Center, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, USA.
  23. Statistics Korea. 2019. The mining and manufacturing survey. Accessed in http://www.kosis.kr on 2 May 2022.
  24. Tesfom G, Birch N. 2010. Do they buy for their dogs the way they buy for themselves? Psychology and Marketing 27:898-912. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20364
  25. Tobin J. 1958. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26:24-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382
  26. Yang SH, Choi MY. 2015. A study on companion animal owners' theme park visit behavior: Focused on their anthropomorphism' effect on attachment and regret. Tourism Research 9:293-303. [in Korean]