재활치료과학 (Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation)

  • 제11권4호
  • /
  • Pages.41-53
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2635-9340(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-4329(eISSN)
대한신경계작업치료학회 (Korean Society of Neurological Occupational Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정신장애인 직업재활 평가도구에 대한 고찰

A Study on Vocational Rehabilitation Evaluation Tool for Mental Disorders

  • 정은화 (극동대학교 의료보건과학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Jeong, Eun-Hwa (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Far-East University, Professor)
  • 투고 : 2022.07.26
  • 심사 : 2022.08.31
  • 발행 : 2022.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 본 연구는 정신장애인의 직업재활 평가도구를 확인하고 분석함으로써 작업치료 영역에서 임상적으로 유용하게 활용할 수 있는 정신장애인 직업재활 평가도구의 개발을 위한 기초자료로 활용하는 것이다. 연구방법 : 문헌 검색은 Pubmed 데이터베이스를 사용하였으며, 분석 내용은 개발연도, 평가방식, 문항 수, 척도, 평가 문항을 분석하였다. 분석 방법은 각 평가 항목을 기능, 내적요인, 환경, 정신증상의 4가지 범주로 구분하여 각 평가도구의 평가 요소에 대해 파악하였다. 결과 : 검색어를 통한 Pubmed 검색 시 161개의 문헌이 검색되었고, 선정 방법에 따라 Griffiths Work Behavior Scale (GWBS), Occupational Functioning Scale (OFS), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Work Ability Index (WAI), Work Behaviour Inventory (WBI), Work Environment Impact Scale (WEIS), Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)의 7개 평가도구가 선별되었다. 모든 평가도구의 평가항목은 직무와 관련된 기능평가를 포함하였으며, 각 평가도구의 목적에 따라 내적요인, 환경, 정신증상에 대한 측정이 이루어지는 것으로 나타났다. 결론 : 직업 기술은 신체, 인지, 사회기술, 대처능력 등 다양한 기능이 복합적으로 작용하는 기술이다. 따라서 본 연구에서 분석한 기능, 내적요인, 환경, 정신증상의 4가지 요소가 포함될 필요가 있으며, 평가과정에서 발생하는 물리적 제약을 보완하기 위해 ICT 융합 평가도구의 개발함으로써 보다 효율적인 정신장애인 직업재활 평가가 이루어져야 할 것이다.

Objective : The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the vocational rehabilitation evaluation tool for the mentally disabled. Methods : For literature search, the Pubmed database was used, and for the analysis, the development year, evaluation method, number of items, scale, and evaluation items were analyzed. In the analysis method, each evaluation item was divided into four categories: function, internal factor, environment, and mental symptom, and the evaluation elements of each evaluation tool were identified. Results : When searching Pubmed through search terms, 161 documents were retrieved. According to the selection method, Griffiths Work Behavior Scale (GWBS), Occupational Functioning Scale (OFS), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Work Ability Index (WAI), Work Behavior Inventory (WBI), Work Environment Impact Scale (WEIS), and Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) were screened. The evaluation items of all evaluation tools included job-related functional evaluation. According to the purpose of each evaluation tool, internal factors, environment, and mental symptoms were measured. Conclusion : Occupational skills are skills in which various functions such as physical, cognitive, social skills, and coping skills act in a complex way. Therefore, it is necessary to include the four factors analyzed in this study: function, internal factors, environment, and psychiatric symptoms.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 2021년도 극동대학교 교내연구비 지원에 의하여 수행된 것임(FEU2021R03).

참고문헌

  1. Anthony, W. A., Rogers, E. S., Cohen, M., & Davies, R. R. (1995). The relationships between psychiatric symptomatology, work skills, and futuer vocational performance. Psychiatirc Services, 46, 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.46.4.353
  2. Bolton, B., & Roessdler, R. T. (1986). Manual for the work personality profile. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED319194.pdf
  3. Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Becker, D. R. (2008). An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(4), 280-290. https://doi.org/10.2975/31.4.2008.280.290
  4. Bond, G. R., & Friedmeyer, M. H. (1987). Predictive validity of situational assessment at a psychiatric rehabilitation center. Rehabilitation Psychology, 32(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091567
  5. Bryson, G., Bell, M. D., Greig, T., & Kaplan, E. (1999). The Work Behavior Inventory: Prediction of future work success of people with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095181
  6. Bull, H., Ueland, T., Lystad, J. U., Evensen, S., Friis, S., Martinsen, E. W., & Falkum, E. (2015). Validation of the work behavior inventory. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 69(4), 300-306. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2014.973902
  7. Davis, L. W., Lysaker, P. H., Kristeller, J. L., Salyers, M. P., Kovach, A. C., & Woller, S. (2015). Effect of mindfulness on vocational rehabilitation outcomes in stable phase schizophrenia. Psychological Services, 12(3), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000028
  8. Drake, R. E., Mueser, K. T., & Brunette, M. F. (2007). Management of person with co-occurring severe mental illness & substance use disorder: Program implications. World Psychiatry, 6(3), 131-136.
  9. Ekbladh, E., Fan, C. W., Sandqvist, J., Hemmingsson, H., & Taylor, R. (2014). Work environment impact scale: Testing the psychometric properties of the Swedish version. Work, 47(2), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-121574
  10. Goldman, H. H., Skodol, A. E., & Lave, T. R. (1992). Revising Axis X for DSM-IV: A review of measures of social functioning. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1148-1156. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148.
  11. Griffiths, R. D. P. (1973). A standardized assessment of the work behaviour of psychiatric patients. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 123(575), 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.123.4.403
  12. Hannula, J. A., Lahtela, K., Jarvikoski, A. K., Salminen, J., & Makela, P. (2006). Occupational Functioning Scale (OFS)-an instrument for assessment of work ability in psychiatric disorders. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60(5), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480600937140
  13. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureno, G., & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 885-892. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.885
  14. Hwang, M. J., Bang, Y. S., Son, B. Y., & Oh. E. J. (2017). Effect of Job function empowerment program for vocational rehabilitation on job competency of those with an intellectual disability. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 25(4), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2017.25.4.04
  15. Kielhofner, G. (1993). Functional Assessment: Toward a dialectical view of person-environment Relations. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(3), 248-251. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.3.248
  16. Kim, Y. Y., & Lee, Y., P. (2008). Study on the determinants of vocational motives of the persons with mental disorder. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 18(1), 5-26.
  17. Korea Employment Agency for Persons with Disabilities/Employment Development Institute (2021). 2021 Persons with Disabilities Statistics. Ministry of Employment and Labor.Korea Employment Agency for Persons with Disabilities/ Employment Development Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12236/25615
  18. Lee, J. Y., Cho, M. J., & Kwon, J. S. (2006). Global assessment of functioning scale and social and occupational functioning scale. The Korean Journal of Psychopharmacology, 17(2), 122-127.
  19. Lee, K. J. (2003). A study on factors affecting duration of job maintenance of people with disabilities of Korea. Disability & Employment, 13(4), 21-51. https://doi.org/10.15707/disem.2018.28.4.003
  20. Lee, S. G., & Kim, S. H. (2003). A model based vocational evaluation for people with psychiatric disabilities. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 54, 123-147.
  21. Lehman, A. F. (1995). Measuring quality of life in a reformed health system. Health Affairs, 14(3), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.14.3.90
  22. Liberman, R. P., Koperlowicz, A., Ventura, J., & Gutkind, D. (2002). Operational criteria and factors related to recovery from schizophrenia. International Review of Psychiatry, 14, 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954026021000016905
  23. Matheson, L. N., Kaskutas, V., McCowan, S., Shaw, H., & Webb, C. (2001). Development of a database of functional assessment measures related to work disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 11(3), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013074527605
  24. McGlashan, T. H. (1987). Recovery style from mental illness and long-term outcome. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(11), 681-685. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198711000-00006
  25. McIntosh, J., Bloor, M., & Robertson, M. (2008). The health benefits of reductions in individuals' use of illegal drugs. Journal of Substance Use, 13(4), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890701802836
  26. Mundt, J. C., Marks, I. M., Shear, M. K., & Greist, J. M. (2002). The work and social adjustment scale: A simple measure of impairment in functioning. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 180(5), 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.5.461
  27. Park, S. H. (2013). The effects of vocational rehabilitation on quality of Life in a client with depression: Case study. Journal of Korean Academy of Mental Health in Occupational Therapy, 3(1), 1-8.
  28. Peer, J. E., Kinnaman, J. E. S., & Tenhula, W. N. (2019). Modified Work Behavior Inventory assessment: Evaluation of psychometric properties. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition, 16, 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2018.12.003
  29. Rogers, E. S., Sciarappa, K., & Anthony, W. A. (1991). Development and evaluation of situational assessment instruments and procedures for persons with psychiatric disability. Vocational Evaluation & Work Adjustment Bulletin, 24(2), 61-67.
  30. Rogers, K. D., Young, A., Lovell, K., Campbell, M., Scott, P. R., & Kendal, S. (2013). The British sign language versions of the patient health questionnaire, the generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale, and the work and social adjustment scale. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18(1), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ens040
  31. Samara, M. T., Engel, R. R., Millier, A., Kandenwein, J., Toumi, M., & Leucht, S. (2014). Equipercentile linking of scales measuring functioning and symptoms: Examining the GAF, SOFAS, CGI-S, and PANSS. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 24(11), 1767-1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.08.009
  32. Qing, D. S. W., Minh, K. K., Xin, K. C. K., YanLin, E. C., Chern, A., Budihardjom, V., & Tan, B. L. (2021). Using the work behaviour inventory and work environment impact scale to measure employment sustainability for people with severe mental illness in a vocational rehabilitation program. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 68(3), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12718
  33. Wastberg, B. A., Haglund, L., & Eklund, M. (2012). The work environment impact scale-self-rating (WEIS-SR) evaluated in primary health care in Sweden. Work, 42(3), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1418
  34. Williams, E. R. (1997). Work Personality Profile: Validation within the supported employment environment. Journal of Rehabilitation, 63(2), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091567