Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship between the Perception of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers' 'Scientific Creativity' and 'Scientific Creativity Education': Focus on Creativity 'within a Frame' and 'between Frames'

예비초등교사의 '과학 창의성'과 '과학 창의성 교육'에 대한 인식의 연관성 -틀 내 및 틀 간 창의성을 중심으로-

  • Received : 2022.08.03
  • Accepted : 2022.10.19
  • Published : 2022.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between the perception of 'scientific creativity' and 'scientific creativity education' of pre-service elementary school teachers was explored, focusing on the creativity within and between the framework. Within-frame creativity is divided into theoretical creativity and experimental creativity that operate within the paradigm, and between-frame creativity refers to theoretical creativity that brings about paradigm shift. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, and the analysis was performed based on the categories within and between the frames. As a result, pre-service elementary school teachers mainly understood scientific creativity as the scientific creativity within a frame. And they consider scientific creativity in various ways in experimental and theoretical creativity aspects within a frame. On the other hand, they thought that scientific creativity education was possible in terms of experimental creativity within a frame. Based on the results of this study, we would like to discuss the attributes of scientific creativity that can be considered in science education and its educational direction.

본 연구에서는 예비초등교사의 '과학 창의성'과 '과학 창의성 교육'에 대한 인식의 연관성을 틀 내 및 틀 간 창의성을 중심으로 탐색하였다. 틀 내 창의성은 패러다임 내에서 작동하는 이론적 창의성과 실험적 창의성으로 구분되고, 틀 간 창의성을 패러다임의 변화를 가져오는 이론적 창의성을 의미한다. 자료 수집은 심층 면담으로 이루어졌으며, 분석은 틀 내 및 틀 간 범주를 토대로 수행되었다. 연구결과, 예비초등교사들은 주로 틀 내 창의성의 관점에서 '과학 창의성'을 인식하고 있었다. 또한 이들은 '과학 창의성'을 틀 내 창의성 관점에서 실험적 창의성과 이론적 창의성의 관점에서 다양하게 생각하고 있었다. 반면 예비초등교사들은 '과학 창의성 교육'은 틀 내 실험적 창의성의 관점에서 가능하다고 인식하고 있었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 과학 교육에서 고려할 수 있는 과학 창의성의 특성과 이를 위한 과학교육의 방향에 대해서 논의하고자 한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2020년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임(NRF-2020R1I1A1A01066598).

References

  1. Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245-274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022103903080
  2. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for 'mini-c'creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73
  3. Cho, Y. (2013). Inquiry of teaching-learning model nurturing student creativity. Thinking Development, 9(2), 1-22.
  4. Choi, S.-D., Kim, J.-Y., Ban, S.-J., Lee, K.-J., Lee, S.-J., & Choi, H.-Y. (2011). Education strategy to foster creative talent for the 21st century. KEDI RRC 2011-01.
  5. Dunbar, K. (1999). Science. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of creativity (pp.525-531). CA: Academic Press.
  6. Education Reform Committee (1995). Educational reform plan to establish new educational systems guided globalization and informatization era: the 2nd president report.
  7. Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. Hong, E., Heo, N., & Lee, B. (2016). Investigation of 'group scientific creativity' factors in gifted students' creative project solving context. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 527-538. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0527
  9. Hoover, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Scientific problem solving and problem finding: A theoretical model. In M. A. Runco, (Eds.) Problem finding, problem solving and creativity (pp. 201-219). NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  10. Jung, H.-C., Han, K.-S., Kim, B.-N., & Choe, S.-U. (2002). Development of programs to enhance the scientific creativitiy -Based on theory and examples-. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 23(4), 334-348.
  11. Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
  12. Kim, H.-S. (2010). A philosophical approach for creativity of science: A relationship between creativity research and scientific discovery. Korean Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 13(2), 117-146.
  13. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions.(2nd edition) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Lee, S. (2017). Scientific creativity 'within a frame' and 'between frames'-Paradigm and scientific creativity-. Journal of Humanities, 67, 35-59. https://doi.org/10.31310/HUM.067.02
  15. Lee, S., Kim, N., Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the effect for creativity, creative problem solving abilities in STEAM. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 87~101.
  16. Lee J., Noh T., & Lee S.-K. (2017). The characteristics of instrumental genesis appearing in the processes of high school students' school scientific inquiries. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 971-980.
  17. Ministry of education (2015). The 2015 revised curriculum: science. Seoul: Ministry of education.
  18. Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Pal-mon, R. & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534380
  19. Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.) Handbook of creativity (pp.392-430). Cambridge University Press.
  20. Park, J. (2004). A suggestion of cognitive model of scientific creativity (CMSC). Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 375-386.
  21. P ark, S. H., Choe, S. U., & Kim, C. J. (2020). Elementary students' creativity appear in small group interactions during model-based classrooms on terraforming. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(6), 611-620. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.6.611
  22. Park, J. & Kim, J. (2013). Development and analysis of various activity types for teaching scientific creativity. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.310
  23. Park, J., & Jee, K. (2015). Investigating students, teachers, and parents' recognition of contrary views on scientific creativity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 395-402. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0395
  24. Park, J., Jung, H., Kim, D. Y., Kim, J. Y., Seo, Y. S., Lee, S. A., & Lee, S.-K. (2019). Micro-discourses on creativity by elementary school teachers. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 36(3), 259-288. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2019.36.3.259
  25. Park, J., Park, E. J., & Lee, S.-K. (2018). Perception of pre-service elementary school teachers on creativity and scientific creativity education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(12), 241-267.
  26. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2010). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework.
  27. Plucker, J. A. (2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 1 .12.
  28. Reilly, R., Lilly, F., Bramwell, G., & Kronish, N. (2011). A synthesis of research concerning creative teachers in a Canadian context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 533-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.007
  29. Runco, M. A. (1996). Creativity and development: Recommendations. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 87-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219967208
  30. So, K. (2016). A review of main issues surrounding creativity in school education: Implications for curriculum study. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 99-119.
  31. Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., Do, J.-H., Min, B.-G., Park, S. C., Bae, S.-M., Son, Y.-A., Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J.-K., Lee, H. J., Ihm, H., Jeong, D. H., Jung, J. H., Kim, J., & Joung, Y. J. (2019). Contents and features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the next generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465~478.
  32. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills - Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  33. Yoo, Y., Kang, YJ., & Kim, J. (2013). The relationships among scientific creativity and general creativity, meta-cognition, and affective characteristics. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 17(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2013.17.1.109
  34. Yoon, H. & Woo, A. J. (2011). The development and implementation of teaching-learning program for enhancement of scientific creativity. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 115-138.
  35. Wang, C. W., & Horng, R. Y. (2002) The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance. R&D Management, 32, 35-45.
  36. Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.