Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis of Oversea Land Registration Systems - UK, Australia, USA, the Netherlands, France, Sweden -

외국의 최신 토지등록제도에 관한 비교연구 - 영국, 호주, 미국, 네덜란드, 프랑스, 스웨덴 -

  • Received : 2022.10.07
  • Accepted : 2022.11.22
  • Published : 2022.12.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study reviewed the concept of land registration and analyzed the land registration system in UK, Australia, USA, the Netherlands, France and Sweden. Land registration is a process of registering physical information and rights related to land in the land register for protection and regulation of land rights, taxation and dispute resolution. The land registration systems in the six countries were mainly analyzed in terms of policy, land register, objects and systems. As a result, first, the establishment of the land registration master plan is of paramount importance for sustainable development of land registration systems. Second, land register needs to be improved for 4D land management and service. Third, reduction of period and improvement of work efficiency for the cadastral resurveying should be considered. Last, a plan to improve public services by linking the geospatial technology with the land registration system is need.

본 연구의 목적은 토지등록제도의 개념을 검토하고 영국, 호주, 미국, 네덜란드, 프랑스, 스웨덴 6개국의 토지등록제도를 비교·분석하여, 이들이 시사하는 바를 도출하고자 한다. 토지등록이란 토지권리의 보호 및 규제, 과세, 분쟁 해결 등을 위하여 토지와 관련된 물리적·권리적 정보를 토지공부에 등록하는 프로세스이다. 6개국 토지등록제도는 토지등록제도, 토지등록공부, 등록대상, 토지등록시스템 등에 주요 초점을 두고 분석하였으며, 이들이 시사하는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 토지등록 및 지적제도 발전을 위하여 중장기 기본계획의 수립이 중요하다. 둘째, 4차원 토지관리를 위하여 지적공부의 개선이 필요하다. 셋째, 지적재조사사업의 기간 단축 및 업무 효율성 향상 방안이 마련되어야 한다. 마지막, 최신공간정보 기술과 토지등록제도를 연계하여 대국민 서비스의 고도화 방안이 필요하다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원의 지원으로 수행되었음(과제번호 기획과제 2022-1).

References

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2016. A Basic Plan of Cadastral Resurvey.
  2. Kim, YH. 2004. A Comparative Analysis of Foreign Land Administration Reform and Its Implication of Cadastral Reform. Journal of the Korean Society of Cadastre. 20(2):43-60. https://doi.org/10.22988/KSC.2004.20.2.005
  3. Kim YH, Lee WM, Lee DH, Kim NS. 2012. Cadastre. ShinGwang Press.
  4. Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation Spatial Information Research Institute. 2010. Study on the Cadastral System of Modern Countries.
  5. Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation Spatial Information Research Institute. 2011. A Study on north American Cadastral System and Geospatial Information Industry Trends.
  6. Ryu, BC, 1999. A comparative study on the cadastral system of Korea and foreign countries. [dissertation]. DanKook University.
  7. Ryu BC. 2020. A Study on the Swiss Cadastral & Registration System. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(2):169-187. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2020.50.2.169
  8. Park JH, Jeong TY. 2021. Comparative Policy of an Organization of Land Management in UK: Land Registry & Ordnance Survey. Journal of the Korean Cadastre Information Association, 23(2):112-125. https://doi.org/10.46416/JKCIA.2021.08.23.2.112
  9. Park HR. 2004. American Recording and Registration System, Human Rights and Justice. 338:121-137.
  10. Shin DH. 2004. A Study on the Japanese Cadastral System. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 34(3):94-113.
  11. Lee SS. 2016. Introduction to the notary system and registration system in the United States. Notarization and Trust. 9:237-254.
  12. Lee HJ, Kim KI. 2009. A Review on the Trends & Suggestive Remarks of Japanese Cadastral Survey Project. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 39(1):113-130.
  13. Jeong YJ, Lee JY. 2019. Comparative Analysis on Korean and Germany and France Cadastral System Using Comparative Analysis Model for Cadastral System. Journal of the Korean Cadastre Information Association. 21(3):3-17. https://doi.org/10.46416/jkcia.2019.12.21.3.3
  14. Korea Land and Geospatial InformatiX Co. Management Innovation Promotion Team. 2017. Foreign Cadastral System.
  15. Hong SE, Lee HJ. 2009. A Study on a Scheme for Quality Control and Application of a Serial Cadastral Map. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 39(1):157-170.
  16. Hong, Bong Joo.(2009).The Title Registration System in the American Real Property Law. Land Law Review, 25(2):31-54. https://doi.org/10.22868/KOLAND.2009.25.2.002
  17. BLM. 2019. The Bureau of Land Management Information Technology Strategic Plan 2019-2024.
  18. Bouma, G., Atkinson, C., 1995. A handbook of social science research. 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University.
  19. Bryman, A. 2016. Social research method. 5th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Coutts, B. 2010. Disciplinary principles for cadastral surveyors: A case study in Australia and New Zealand. FIG XDIV International Congress, Sydney. Australia 11-16 April 2010.
  21. Dale, P., McLaughlin, J., 1999. Land Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Holland, P. 2005. Australian government and land administration systems, The Expert Group Meeting. Melbourne. 9-11 November 2005.
  23. ICSM, 2015. Cadastre 2034 Powering Land & Real Property: Cadastral Reform and Innovation for Australia - A national strategy.
  24. Kumar, R. 2005. Research methodology: A step-by step guide for beginners. 4th ed., London: SAGE publications Ltd.
  25. Kadaster. 2021. Meerjarenbeleidsplan 2022-2026 Kadaster.
  26. Land Registry. 2000. Study on key aspects of land registration and cadastral legislation.
  27. Land Registry. 2017. Business Strategy 2017-2022.
  28. Larsson, G. 1991. Land Registration and Cadastral Systems. New York: Longman Scientific & Technical.
  29. Lepage, E., Goulard, C. How the computer-based cadastral map is used to monitor property ownership in France.
  30. Mathieu, B. and Maylis, D. Cadastre: as much a land tool as a fiscal tool. Technical Committee LandTenure & Development. Finance Publiques.
  31. Meyer, N., Stage, D., Schiebold, S. 2012. Parcel data sharing for wildland fire. [https://glorecords.blm.gov/reference/nationalCad_studies_reports_active/Wildland_Fire_Parcel_Data_Sharing_Report_May_2012.pdf] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  32. Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D. 1992. Research methods in the social science. 4th ed., London: Edward Arnold
  33. Ordnance Survey. 2021. 2020-21 Annual report and financial statements.
  34. Punch, K. 2014. Introduction to social research quantitative & qualitative approaches. 3rd ed., London: SAGE Publications Ltd
  35. Quan, D. A. 2011. Two land registration systems. The land law of Vietnam and of Sweden. Lund University.
  36. Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallance, J., Rajabifard, A. 2010. Land administration for sustainable development. ESRI Press Academic.
  37. Zevenbergen, J. 2002. Systems of land registration: Aspects and effects. NCG, Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie, Netherlands Geodetic Commission.
  38. 국가공간정보포털 홈페이지 [http://www.nsdi.go.kr/lxportal/?menuno=2679] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  39. Allegheny County website [https://www.alleghenycounty.us/real-estate/index.aspx] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  40. Australian Government website [https://www.australia.gov.au] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  41. BBC News [https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47196898] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  42. Bexar County website I [https://www.bexar.org/2946/County-Clerk] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  43. Bexar County website II [https://bexar.org/2950/Real-PropertyLandRecord) (https://bexar.tx.publicsearch.us/results?_recordedYears=2020-Present&department=RP&limit=50&offset=0&recordedDateRange=17530101%2C20220311&searchOcrText=false&searchType=quickSearch&searchValue=deed] Last accessed 16 March 2022
  44. BLM Website I [https://www.blm.gov/about/organization-chart] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  45. BLM Website II [https://glorecords.blm.gov/default.aspx] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  46. BLM Website III [https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/survey/default.aspx?dm_id=286732&sid=2fw55b4p.s0z&surveyDetailsTabIndex=1] Last accessed 23 March 2022
  47. BLM Website IV [https://blm-egis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6f0da4c7931440a8a80bfe20eddd7550] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  48. BLM Website V [https://www.blm.gov/maps] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  49. BLM Website VI [https://www.blm.gov/services/geospatial/mobile-GIS] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  50. Cadastre France [cadastre.gouv.fr/scpc/html/QuestionsReponses.html] Last Accessed 06 April 2022
  51. Cadastral Template [cadastraltemplate.org/sweden.php] Last Accessed 27 May 2022
  52. Cadastraltemplate 2.0 website [http://cadastraltemplate.org/united%20kingdom.php] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  53. Eurogeographics website [https://eurogeographics.org/our-members/] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  54. Geofoncier [https://www.geofoncier.fr/4-2-bornage.php] Last Accessed 11 May 2022
  55. GOV.UK website [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ordnance-survey] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  56. ICSM website I [https://www.icsm.gov.au/sites/default/files/Aust_and_NZ_Cadastral_System-QandA.pdf] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  57. ICSM website II [https://vimeo.com/392839696/f03c2618e5] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  58. Land Registry website I [https://www.gov.uk/search-property-information-land-registry] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  59. Land Registry website II [https://www.gov.uk/get-information-about-property-and-land/search-the-register] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  60. Land Registry website III [https://www.gov.uk/your-property-boundaries] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  61. Land Registry website IV [https://use-land-property-data.service.gov.uk/] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  62. Land Registry website V [https://eservices.landregistry.gov.uk/eservices/FindAProperty/view/QDSearch.do] Last accessed 16 March 2022
  63. Land Registry website VI [https://search-local-land-charges.service.gov.uk/] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  64. Lantmateriet [https://www.lantmateriet.se/en/maps-andgeographic-information/geodata-products/product-list/property-classification-view-/] Last Accessed 18 May 2022
  65. NSW Government website I [https://www.spatial.nsw.gov.au/what_we_do/projects/digital_twin] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  66. NSW Government website II [https://www.spatial.nsw.gov.au/news/nsw_survey_marks_mobile_app] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  67. Ordnance Survey Website I [https://beta.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/customers/public-sector] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  68. Ordnance Survey Webstie II [https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/newsroom/news/os-data-hub-new-wave-of-developers-benefiting-from-power-of-location] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  69. Property Registry website I (5 Cedarton Crescent, Ormeau) Last accessed 16 March 2022 [https://propertyregistry.com.au/land-title-search/nsw/] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  70. Property Registry website II [https://propertyregistry.com.au/land-title-search/] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  71. Property Registry website III [https://propertyregistry.com.au/how-to-read-a-certificate-of-title/] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  72. Property Registry website IV [https://propertyregistry.com.au/plan-search/?state=NSW&search_type=Plans+Search] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  73. Property Registry website V [https://propertyregistry.com.au/] Last accessed 13 June 2022
  74. The Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Cadastral Subcommittee Mortgage Study Team, 2009, Land Parcel Data for the Mortgage Crisis: Results of the Stakeholders Meeting [https://glorecords.blm.gov/reference/nationalCad_studies_reports_active/Land_Parcel_Data_for_the_Mortgage_Crisis.pdf] Last accessed 13 June 2022