Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of light intensity on growth performance, blood components, carcass characteristics, and welfare of broilers

  • Hee-Jin, Kim (Poultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jiseon, Son (Poultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Hyun-Soo, Kim (Poultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Eui-Chul, Hong (Poultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Ji-Hyuk, Kim (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University)
  • Received : 2022.04.25
  • Accepted : 2022.06.08
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of light intensity on growth performance, blood components, eye condition, and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Three hundred and fifty-two 1-day-old male chicks were assigned to one of four treatments (four repetitions per treatment, 22 birds per repetition) and reared in a floor pen for 5 weeks. From the second week, chicks were reared under four different levels of light intensity (5, 20, 35, and 50 lx) and the lighting duration was maintained at 18-hours light : 6-hours dark (18L : 6D). The feed intake and body weight were measured weekly. At 35 days of age, 12 birds per treatment were randomly selected for blood sampling, eye measurement, and carcass analysis. There were no significant differences in body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio among treatments. Triglyceride levels in the serum were significantly higher in the 5 lx treatment, and creatinine was significantly lower in the 5 lx treatment (p < 0.05). The heterophil : lymphocyte ratios decreased significantly as light intensity increased (p < 0.05); however, other blood cell compositions were not affected by light intensity. Interleukin-6 content was significantly higher in the 5 lx treatment than in other treatments (p < 0.05), but the content of tumor necrosis factor-α was not significantly different among treatments. Serum corticosterone concentration was significantly higher at 5 lx than at 20, 35, and 50 lx (p < 0.05). The corneal diameter was the highest in 5 lx treatment (p < 0.05), and tended to increase as the light intensity decreased. Other eye parameters were not significantly different among treatments, but displayed a tendency to increase as the light intensity decreased. Carcass yield and part yields were not affected by light intensity. Meat quality parameters (pH, color, cooking loss, and water-holding capacity) did not show significant difference among the treatments. The results indicate that a light intensity of 5 lx may increase physiological stress or have a negative effect on broiler welfare, even if the performance and carcass characteristics are not affected. Therefore, a light intensity of 20 lx or above is recommended considering both the growth performance and welfare of broilers.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Light is an important environmental factor that affects poultry physiology. Artificial lighting programs are critical for poultry management in environmentally controlled poultry houses [1]. Artificial control of light is called lighting management, and comprises light intensity, photoperiod, and light source management. It has an important effect on the growth of broilers [2]. In particular, light intensity management can have substantial consequences on the performance and welfare of broiler [3,4].

However, most commercial broiler farms where animal welfare certification standards are not applied often lower their light intensity to reduce broiler activity and save energy [2].

Low light intensity (< 10 lx) negatively affects poultry welfare, resulting in skeletal disorders, foot pad dermatitis, and eye defect [1,5]. Furthermore, when low light intensity is maintained in poultry houses, the anatomical structure of the eyes may change, resulting in dry eye, choroiditis, glaucoma, and lens distortion [1]. These symptoms are more severe at a light intensity of 1 lx than at 5 lx [5]. In addition, the expression of exploratory activities and comfortable behavior was reported to be reduced at a low light intensity of 5 lx [6]. Therefore, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) [7] and Animal Welfare Certification Standards of Korea [8] recommend a light intensity of at least 20 lx to allow broilers to easily consume feed and water, in addition to improving their welfare.

Although many studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of light intensity on the performance (body weight, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio [FCR]) and health of broilers [1,9-11], relatively few studies have comprehensive investigated physiological responses or aspects associated with animal welfare. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of light intensity, ranging from 5 to 50 lx, on the growth performance, blood biochemical profile, carcass characteristics, and welfare parameters of broiler chickens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experimental procedure for this study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration (Approval No.: 2020-424).

Experimental design, birds, and housing

A total of 352 1-day-old male broiler chicks (Ross 308) were used in a 5-week experiment. During the first 7 days, the chicks were reared under the same lighting condition (30 lx) with a 22-hours light : 2-hours dark (22L:2D) photoperiod. From the second week, chicks (average body weight, 164.8±1.06 g) were assigned to four treatments consisting of four levels (5, 20, 35, and 50 lx) of light intensity. Each treatment room contained four replicate pens (2 × 2 m floor pen with rice hull bedding). At the end of the experiment, the photoperiod was maintained at 18L:6D in accordance with the Animal Welfare Certification Standard of Korea [8]. LED bulbs were used as the light source, and the light intensity was measured regularly using a lux meter placed near the floor level. Other management practices (temperature, humidity, litter, etc.) were consistent with established management guidelines [12].

Feeding management

Birds were provided with a corn-soybean meal-based commercial broiler starter (crude protein [CP] 22.5%, metabolizable energy [ME] 3,020 kcal/kg) for week 1, grower (CP 18.5%, ME 3,050 kcal/kg) for week 2–3, and finisher (CP 18.0%, ME 3,100 kcal/kg) for week 4–5. Birds were provided the diets on an ad libitum basis and had free access to water via a bell-type water dispenser throughout the experiment.

Growth performance evaluation

Body weight and feed intake were measured weekly per replication at 7, 14, 21 and 35 days of age. The FCR was calculated by dividing the body weight gain with feed intake.

Blood sampling and measurements

At 35 days of age, 12 birds per treatment were randomly selected, and blood samples were collected from their wing veins for determining blood biochemical profiles. Blood cells were analyzed for leukocytes, erythrocytes, and platelets using a hemocytometer (HematVet 950, Drew Scientific, Miami Lakes, FL, USA).

Serum biochemical composition was analyzed using a blood analyzer (AU 480 Chemistry Analyzer, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) to determine triglyceride (TG), glucose (GLU), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine (CREAT) levels.

Serum cytokines

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) were analyzed to compare the immune response in broilers according to light intensity. Cytokine analysis was performed using a commercial Chicken TNF-α ELISA Kit (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA) and a Chicken IL-6 ELISA Kit (MyBioSource). In this analysis, 100 μL of the sample was placed in a 96-well plate and incubated at 37℃ for 90 min, after which an antibody was added and allowed to bind for 1 h. The wells were then washed three times with a washing solution, and 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate working solution was added and incubated again at 37℃ for 30 min.

Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a spectrophotometer (Epoch 2, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) after the addition of stop solution.

Serum corticosterone

The serum corticosterone concentration was analyzed using a commercial Corticosterone ELISA Kit (ADI-900-097, Enzo Life Science, Farmingdale, NY, USA). The serum sample (100 μL) was mixed with 50 μL of conjugate and 50 μL of antibody and then incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The mixture was washed three times, 200 μL of substrate was added, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 1 h. After adding the stop solution, absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a spectrophotometer (Epoch 2, BioTek Instruments).

Eye dimensions

At 35 days of age, 12 broilers with similar body weight (1.8 ± 0.07 kg) per treatment were selected and extraocular tissues were removed from the eyeball. The weight, corneal diameter, dorsoventral diameter, mediolateral diameter, and anteroposterior size were measured using a digital scale and digital calipers.

Carcass yield and part yields

At 35 days of age, 12 birds with similar body weight (1.8 ± 0.07 kg) per treatment were selected to analyze the carcass yield and meat quality characteristics. Carcass yield was calculated by dividing carcass weight with the live weight after removing the feathers, head, giblets, and feet. Subsequently, the carcass was divided into five parts (breast, legs, wings, neck, and back including bones) and weighed individually, and the cut yield of each part was calculated as a percentage of live weight.

Physicochemical characteristics of breast meat

Breast meat samples collected from 12 birds per treatment were used to analyze physicochemical parameters. The chemical composition (moisture, CP, crude fat, and crude ash) of the breast meat was determined using the AOAC method [13]. The pH was measured using a pH meter (pH-K21, NWK-Binar GmbH, Celiusstr, Germany) and color intensity (CIE L*, a*, b*) was measured using a colorimeter (CR301 Chromameter, Minolta, Osaka, Japan) calibrated with a white standard plate (Y = 92.40, x = 0.3136, and y = 0.3196).

Shear force (SF), cooking loss and water holding capacity (WHC) of the breast meat were analyzed using the method of Chae et al. [14]. For the determination of SF, each sample (average weight, 61 g) was heated individually in a polyethylene bag immersed in a 70℃ water bath for 10 min. After heating, the samples were cooled, and the cores (diameter, 1.27 cm) were taken in the longitudinal direction of the muscle fibers. SF values were detected using a Warner-Bratzler shear blade attached to a texture analyzer (Model TA-XT2, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK). To measure the cooking loss, each sample within a polyethylene bag was heated in an 85℃ water bath for 45 min. After cooling for 20 min, cooking loss was calculated as the percentage of weight loss after heating. The WHC was calculated as a percentage (%) by subtracting the free water generated by centrifugation from the total water of the meat. For free water, 0.5 g of a sample from which fat and fascia (tendon) were removed, was placed in a tube, heated in a water bath at 80℃ for 20 min, and centrifuged at 448×g for 10 min. The value obtained by dividing the fat coefficient (the value obtained after subtracting the fat content from the sample, %) with the weight before and after centrifugation was calculated as a percentage.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained in the experiment was analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) [15]. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine significant differences among treatments, and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Growth performance

The effects of light intensity on broiler growth performance are shown in Table 1. The final body weight at 35 days of age did not show a significant difference among the treatments. Body weight gain and feeding from 7 to 35 days of age were unaffected by light intensity. Scheideler [16] reported that light intensity (ranging from 4 to 20 lx) did not affect the feed intake of broilers, and numerous studies have shown that light intensity has little effect on the feed intake [10,17,18] or body weight [5,10,18] of broilers. The results of the present study are thus consistent with those of previous studies. However, Charles et al. [17] reported that broilers raised at high light intensity (150 lx) had lower body weights at 6 and 8 weeks of age than those raised at low light intensity (5 lx). Downs et al. [19] found that low light intensity stimulated early feed intake and growth, although it had a transitory effect. Lien et al. [20] also reported that feed intake increased proportionally with 1.76 lx vs. 161.4 lx of light intensity. Blatchford et al. [1] suggested that lower body weight in a bright environment was due to the high activity of broilers under high light intensity. Deep et al. [5] stated that very bright light (100 or 150 lx) might have stimulated the activity to an extent resulting in increased energy utilization for maintenance rather than for growth.

Table 1. Effect of light intensity on growth performance of broilers from 7 d to 35 d of age

DMJGDA_2022_v64n5_985_t0001.png 이미지

FCR, feed conversion ratio.

Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was not significantly different among treatments in the present experiment, which is in agreement with the findings of Buyse et al. [21], who reported that light intensity ranging from 5 to 51 lx did not affect broiler FCR. Similarly, Downs et al. [19] reported that the FCR was not noticeably affected by light intensity, and Lien et al. [11] found no significant effects of light treatment on FCR, although body weight and feed consumption were affected by light intensity and photoperiod. However, Olanrewaju et al. [22] found a difference in FCR at 28 days of age under 25 lx and 5 lx light intensity. Newberry et al. [9] suggested that a lower light intensity may improve FCR due to a reduction in activity and stimulation of muscular growth.

Blood profiles

Table 2 shows the blood cell composition of broilers according to light intensity. The heterophil : lymphocyte (HE/LY) ratio significantly decreased as light intensity increased (p < 0.05). However, other blood cell components did not show a significant difference among treatments according to light intensity. The HE/LY ratio and serum corticosterone level were used as indicators to evaluate stress in broilers [23,24]. Some studies have shown that the HE/LY ratio increases in stressful environments [25-27]. As the corticosterone level increases, the HE/LY ratio also increases in broiler chickens [28,29]. It is also known that the corticosterone level indicates the acute stress response, whereas the HE/LY ratio is related to the chronic stress response of the immune system [30]. Weimer et al. [31] reported that the HE/LY ratio was positively correlated with corticosterone levels in broilers reared under different light intensities and flooring types.

Table 2. Effect of light intensity on blood cell composition of broilers at 35 d of age

DMJGDA_2022_v64n5_985_t0002.png 이미지

a,bMeans in same rows with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

WBC, white blood cell; HE, heterophil; Ly, lymphocyte; HE/LY, heterophil/lymphocyte; MO, monocytes; EO, eosinophils; BA, basophils; RBC, red blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.

In the present study, the HE/LY ratio was the lowest in the 50 lx light group and the highest in the 5 lx group. This implies that 5 lx of light intensity induced more stress in the birds compared with those in brighter environments. However, Dereli Fidan et al. [32] reported a higher HE/LY ratio in broilers in the brighter light (20 lx) group than in those in the dim and reducing light group (5 to 1.25 lx). Weimer et al. [31] also reported that the HE/LY ratio was higher for birds in the brighter light treatment (10 lx) than in those in dim light treatments (2 and 5 lx). In contrast, Lien et al. [11] reported that the HE/LY ratio at 40 days of age was unaffected by light intensity (10. 76 lx vs 1.76 lx). The variation in these results is presumed to result from the different range of light intensity, experimental period, and environmental conditions in each experiment.

The effects of light intensity on serum biochemical profiles are presented in Table 3. Blood parameters such as cholesterol, TG, GLU, and total protein levels can be used as indicators of stress [33,34]. Serum TG levels were significantly higher in the 5 lx treatment than in other treatments (p < 0.05). This result is in agreement with that of Dereli Fidan et al. [32], who reported that TG levels were significantly higher in the dim light (5 to 1.5 lx) group compared with those in the bright light (20 lx) group. However, blood GLU levels were not affected by light intensity in the present study. AST and ALT concentrations indicate the health of the liver, and the lower the concentration, the better the liver status [35-37]. Light intensity in the present experiment did not influence AST and ALT levels. The CREAT level was the lowest in the 5 lx treatment and gradually increased as the light intensity increased (p < 0.05). CREAT is an index used to assess renal function, with a high CREAT content indicating better renal function [38].

Table 3. Effect of light intensity on serum biochemical parameters of broilers at 35 d of age

DMJGDA_2022_v64n5_985_t0003.png 이미지

a,bMeans in same rows with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

TG, triglyceride; GLU, glucose; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CREAT, creatinine.

Cytokine and corticosterone concentrations

IL-6 levels in serum were significantly higher in the 5 lx treatment than in other treatments (p < 0.05; Table 4). However, TNF-α content was not significantly affected by light intensity. Serum corticosterone levels were significantly higher in the 5 lx treatment than in the 20 lx, 35 lx, and 50 lx treatments (p < 0.05).

Table 4. Effect of light intensity on serum cytokines and corticosterone concentration of broilers at 35 d of age

DMJGDA_2022_v64n5_985_t0004.png 이미지

a,bMeans in same rows with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

IL-6 is secreted by immune cells in the body and strongly stimulates the secretion of the hormone cortisol [39]; it may, therefore, be regarded as an indicator of stress. In the present study, IL-6 levels showed a trend similar to that of corticosterone levels. TNF-α, which is mainly secreted during inflammation [40], showed a tendency to decrease as light intensity increased, although no significant difference was observed.

The release of corticosterone is activated by environmental stressors in the adrenal cortex [41], and serum corticosterone levels are widely used in animal stress and welfare studies [42]. The highest corticosterone concentration was detected in the 5 lx treatment. In a report by Weimer et al. [31], the corticosterone level in birds at 2 lx was 20% higher than that at 5 lx, and tended to increase as light intensity decreased from 10 lx to 5 and 2 lx.

Very high or low light intensity may cause stress and thus negatively affect chicken welfare [21,31,43]. Although the mechanism by which light intensity causes stress in broilers has not yet been clearly identified, it is known that low light intensity limits broiler behavior [20]. The flicker effect (ripples of light) of LED bulb may also cause stress in birds [44]. The flicker effect of the light source is a very important factor in the current poultry industry, and although it is known that chickens do not recognize the flicker effect of 100 Hz [45], few studies have investigated this.

Eye dimensions

There was no significant effect of light intensity on broiler eye weight, dorsoventral diameter (height), anteroposterior size (length), or mediolateral diameter (horizontal), although these parameters tended to increase as light intensity decreased (Table 5). However, the corneal diameter was significantly larger in the 5 lx treatment than in other treatments (p < 0.05), displaying a tendency to increase as light intensity decreased.

Table 5. Effect of light intensity on eye dimensions of broilers at 35 d of age

DMJGDA_2022_v64n5_985_t0005.png 이미지

a,bMeans in same rows with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

The light intensity influences the dimensions of the chicken eye [1,5]. Deep et al. [5] reported significant differences in eye weight, corneal diameter, dorsoventral diameter, mediolateral diameter, and anteroposterior size at a low light intensity (1 lx). Blatchford et al. [1] also reported that broilers raised at 5 lx light intensity tended to have heavier eyes than those raised at 50 lx.

In the present study, no significant difference was detected among treatments, except for corneal diameter, although most eye dimensions tended to decrease as light intensity decreased from 50 lx to 5 lx. Some differences between this result and those of previous studies are presumed to be based on the range of illumination and the light source, and further research is necessary to determine the exact cause.

Carcass yield and physicochemical characteristics of meat

Light intensity did not significantly affect carcass or part yields of broilers at 35 days of age (Table 6). The results of this study are consistent with those reported by Olanrewaju et al. [18,22]. Generally, carcass yield and part yields are closely related to the performance of broilers [46,47]. It is presumed that the similar growth performance among treatments resulted in no difference in carcass yield in this study. However, Downs et al. [18] showed that the breast meat ratio decreased and the wing ratio increased when the light intensity was lowered form 20 lx to 2.5 lx . Dereli Fidan et al. [48] reported that carcass yield and breast meat ratio were higher in bright light (20 lx) treatments, although leg yield was increased under dim light conditions. This discrepancy is thought to be due to the different age at slaughtering. In the present study, carcass yield was measured at the age of 35 days (conventional marketing age in Korea), but in other studies, the birds were slaughtered at 42 days of age.

Table 6. Effect of light intensity on carcass yield and part yield of broilers at 35 d of age (% of live weight)

DMJGDA_2022_v64n5_985_t0006.png 이미지

Moisture, CP, crude fat, and crude ash content of breast meat did not differ significantly among treatments. Meat quality parameters, including pH, color, cooking loss, water holding capacity, and shear force of breast meat were not affected by light intensity (Table 7). However, Dereli Fidan et al. [48] reported a higher pH in broilers grown under bright light. This was attributed to the higher glycogen content in the muscle due to less stress in birds in bright environments. The same authors also found that the L* value was lower in the dim light group than in the bright light group, and concluded that dim light led to rapid postmortem glycolysis, with decreased pH and increased L* values. Other meat quality parameters, including a*, b*, cooking loss, and water holding capacity were found to be unaffected by light intensity by Dereli Fidan et al. [48], which is consistent with the finding of the present study.

Table 7. Effect of light intensity on breast meat quality characteristics of broilers at 35 d of age

DMJGDA_2022_v64n5_985_t0007.png 이미지

CONCLUSION

As mentioned previously, the Animal Welfare Certification Standards of Korea [8] recommend a light intensity of ≥20 lx. The results of this study showed that a light intensity of 5 lx had a negative influence on the welfare parameters of broilers, whereas there was little difference between the 20 lx and higher light intensity treatments. Dim light may increase the physiological stress in broiler, even if performance and carcass characteristics are not significantly influenced. Therefore, a light intensity of 20 lx or above is recommended for both productivity and welfare of broilers.

References

  1. Blatchford RA, Klasing KC, Shivaprasad HL, Wakenell PS, Archer GS, Mench JA. The effect  of light intensity on the behavior, eye and leg health, and immune function of broiler chickens.  Poult Sci. 2009;88:20-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00177 
  2. Prescott NB, Wathes CM, Jarvis JR. Light, vision and the welfare of poultry. Anim Welf.  2003;12:269-88.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600025689
  3. Prescott NB, Kristensen HH, Wathes CM. Light. In: Weeks CA, Butterworth A, editors.  Measuring and auditing broiler welfare. Wallingford: CABI; 2004. p. 101-16. 
  4. Deep A, Schwean-Lardner K, Crowe TG, Fancher BI, Classen HL. Effect of light intensity  on broiler behaviour and diurnal rhythms. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012;136:50-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.11.002 
  5. Deep A, Schwean-Lardner K, Crowe TG, Fancher BI, Classen HL. Effect of light intensity on  broiler production, processing characteristics, and welfare. Poult Sci. 2010;89:2326-33. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00964 
  6. Alvino GM, Blatchford RA, Archer GS, Mench JA. Light intensity during rearing affects the  behavioural synchrony and resting patterns of broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2009;50:275-83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660902942775 
  7. RSPCA [Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals]. RSPCA welfare standards  for meat chickens. West Sussex: RSPCA; 2017. p. 10-3. 
  8. APQA [Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency]. Animal welfare certification standards of  broilers [Internet]. APQA. 2018 [cited 2022 Mar 2]. https://www.law.go.kr/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000113070#AJAX 
  9. Newberry RC, Hunt JR, Gardiner EE. Light intensity effects on performance, activity, leg  disorders, and sudden death syndrome of roaster chickens. Poult Sci. 1986;65:2232-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0652232 
  10. Kristensen HH, Perry GC, Prescott NB, Ladewig J, Ersboll AK, Wathes CM. Leg health  and performance of broiler chickens reared in different light environments. Br Poult Sci.  2006;47:257-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660600753557 
  11. Lien RJ, Hess JB, McKee SR, Bilgili SF, Townsend JC. Effect of light intensity and  photoperiod on live performance, heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and processing yields of  broilers. Poult Sci. 2007;86:1287-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.7.1287 
  12. NIAS [National Institute of Animal Science]. Korean poultry feeding standard. Wanju: NIAS; 2017. 
  13. AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Chemists]. Official methods of analysis of AOAC  International. 20th ed. Rockville, MD: AOAC International; 2016. 
  14. Chae HS, Hwangbo J, Ahn CN, Yoo YM, Cho SH, Lee JM, et al. Effect of dietary brown rice  on the carcass and meat quality of broiler chicken. Korean J Poult Sci. 2004;31:165-70. 
  15. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT software for PC. Release 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2019. 
  16. Scheideler SE. Research note: effect of various light sources on broiler performance and  efficiency of production under commercial conditions. Poult Sci. 1990;69:1030-3. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691030 
  17. Charles RG, Robinson FE, Hardin RT, Yu MW, Feddes J, Classen HL. Growth, body  composition, and plasma androgen concentration of male broiler chickens subjected to  different regimens of photoperiod and light intensity. Poult Sci. 1992;71:1595-605. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711595 
  18. Olanrewaju HA, Miller WW, Maslin WR, Collier SD, Purswell JL, Branton SL. Effects of  light sources and intensity on broilers grown to heavy weights. Part 1: growth performance,  carcass characteristics, and welfare indices. Poult Sci. 2016;95:727-35. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev360 
  19. Downs KM, Lien RJ, Hess JB, Bilgili SF, Dozier WA III. The effects of photoperiod length,  light intensity, and feed energy on growth responses and meat yield of broilers. J Appl Poult  Res. 2006;15:406-16. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.3.406 
  20. Lien RJ, Hess JB, McKee SR, Bilgili SF. Effect of light intensity on live performance and  processing characteristics of broilers. Poult Sci. 2008;87:853-7. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00277 
  21. Buyse J, Simons PCM, Boshouwers FMG, Decuypere E. Effect of intermittent lighting,  light intensity and source on the performance and welfare of broilers. Worlds Poult Sci J.  1996;52:121-30. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19960012 
  22. Olanrewaju HA, Purswell JL, Collier SD, Branton SL. Effect of varying light intensity on  growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens grown to heavy weights. Int  J Poult Sci. 2011;10:921-6. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.921.926 
  23. Davis AK. Effect of handling time and repeated sampling on avian white blood cell counts. J  Field Ornithol. 2005;76:334-8. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-76.4.334 
  24. Iyasere OS, Beard AP, Guy JH, Bateson M. Elevated levels of the stress hormone,  corticosterone, cause 'pessimistic' judgment bias in broiler chickens. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6860.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07040-y 
  25. Mahmoud KZ, Yaseen AM. Effect of feed withdrawal and heat acclimatization on stress  responses of male broiler and layer-type chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Asian-Australas J  Anim Sci. 2005;18:1445-50. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.1445 
  26. Dozier WA III, Thaxton JP, Purswell JL, Olanrewaju HA, Branton SL, Roush WB. Stocking  density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poult Sci. 2006;85:344-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.2.344 
  27. Mumma JO, Thaxton JP, Vizzier-Thaxton Y, Dodson WL. Physiological stress in laying hens.  Poult Sci. 2006;85:761-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.4.761 
  28. Puvadolpirod S, Thaxton JP. Model of physiological stress in chickens 1. Response parameters.  Poult Sci. 2000;79:363-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.3.363 
  29. Virden WS, Kidd MT. Physiological stress in broilers: ramifications on nutrient digestibility  and responses. J Appl Poult Res. 2009;18:338-47. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00093 
  30. Weimer SL, Wideman RF, Scanes CG, Mauromoustakos A, Christensen KD, Vizzier-Thaxton  Y. An evaluation of methods for measuring stress in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2018;97:3381-9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey204 
  31. Weimer SL, Wideman RF, Scanes CG, Mauromoustakos A, Christensen KD, Vizzier-Thaxton Y. Broiler stress responses to light intensity, flooring type, and leg weakness as assessed  by heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratios, serum corticosterone, infrared thermography, and latency  to lie. Poult Sci. 2020;99:3301-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.028 
  32. Dereli Fidan E, Nazligul A, Turkyilmaz MK, Karaarslan S, Kaya M. Effects of photoperiod  length and light intensity on performance, carcass characteristics and heterophil to lymphocyte  ratio in broilers. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2016;23:39-45. https://doi.org/10.9775/  kvfd.2016.15723 
  33. Onbasilar EE, Yalcin S, Torlak E, Ozdemir P. Effects of early feed restriction on live  performance, carcass characteristics, meat and liver composition, some blood parameters,  heterophil-lymphocyte ratio, antibody production and tonic immobility duration. Trop Anim  Health Prod. 2009;41:1513-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9341-8 
  34. Bedanova I, Voslarova E, Chloupek P, Pistekova V, Suchy P, Blahova J, et al. Stress in broilers  resulting from shackling. Poult Sci. 2007;86:1065-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1065 
  35. Kim JS, Jo HS, Kang HO, Han GY, Jung MH, Choi J. Protective mechanism of flavonoids  isolated from Rhus verniciflua on the paraquat toxicity reducing agent and its inhibition  mechanism. Korean J Life Sci. 2003;13:775-81. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2003.13.6.775 
  36. Hwang EK. Effect of quercetin supplement on major biochemical parameters in sera of rats  fed high fat and high cholesterol diet. J Vet Clin. 2009;26:413-8. 
  37. Son HK, Kang ST, Lee JJ. Effects of Peucedanum japonicum Thunb. on lipid metabolism and  antioxidative activities in rats fed a high-fat/high-cholesterol diet. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr.  2014;43:641-9. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.5.641 
  38. Jung KS, Kim NS, Lee BK. Urinary creatinine concentration in the Korean population in  KNHANES IV, 2009. J Environ Health Sci. 2012;38:31-41. https://doi.org/10.5668/  JEHS.2012.38.1.031 
  39. Willenberg HS, Path G, Vogeli TA, Scherbaum WA, Bornstein SR. Role of interleukin-6 in  stress response in normal and tumorous adrenal cells and during chronic inflammation. Ann N  Y Acad Sci. 2002;966:304-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04230.x 
  40. Chandrashekara S, Jayashree K, Veeranna HB, Vadiraj HS, Ramesh MN, Shobha A, et al.  Effects of anxiety on TNF-α levels during psychological stress. J Phsychosom Res. 2007;63:65-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.03.001 
  41. Siegel HS. Stress, strains and resistance. Br Poult Sci. 1995;36:3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417748 
  42. Scanes CG. Biology of stress in poultry with emphasis on glucocorticoids and the heterophil to  lymphocyte ratio. Poult Sci. 2016;95:2208-15. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew137 
  43. Bessei W. Welfare of meat producing poultry-an overview. Anim Sci Pap Rep. 2005;23:205-16. 
  44. Gladin D, Kavtarashvili A. Light ripples and their effects per person and per bird. E3S Web of  Conferences. 2021;247(01040):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124701040 
  45. Barbur JL, Prescott NB, Douglas RH, Jarvis JR, Wathes CM. A comparative study of stimulusspecific pupil responses in the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) and the human. Vision  Res. 2002;42:249-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00279-6 
  46. Rosa PS, Faria Fiho DE, Dahlke F, Vieira BS, Macari M, Furlan RL. Performance and carcass  characteristics of broiler chickens with different growth potential and submitted to heat stress.  Braz J Poult Sci. 2007;9:181-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2007000300007 
  47. Yogesh K, Deo C, Shrivastava HP, Mandal AB, Wadhwa A, Singh I. Growth performance,  carcass yield, and immune competence of broiler chickens as influenced by dietary supplemental  zinc sources and levels. Agric Res. 2013;2:270-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-013-0067-5 
  48. Dereli Fidan E, Nazligul A, Turkyilmaz MK, unubol Aypak S, Sevil Kilimci F, Karaarslan  S, et al. Effect of photoperiod length and light intensity on some welfare criteria, carcass,  and meat quality characteristics in broilers. Rev Bras Zootec. 2017;46:202-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000300004