DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Heat Waves Predictability of Korean Integrated Model

한국형수치예보모델 KIM의 폭염 예측 성능 검증

  • Jung, Jiyoung (Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Hee (Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems) ;
  • Park, Hye-Jin (Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems)
  • 정지영 ((재)차세대수치예보모델개발사업단) ;
  • 이은희 ((재)차세대수치예보모델개발사업단) ;
  • 박혜진 ((재)차세대수치예보모델개발사업단)
  • Received : 2022.07.06
  • Accepted : 2022.09.26
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

The global weather prediction model, Korean Integrated Model (KIM), has been in operation since April 2020 by the Korea Meteorological Administration. This study assessed the performance of heat waves (HWs) in Korea in 2020. Case experiments during 2018-2020 were conducted to support the reliability of assessment, and the factors which affect predictability of the HWs were analyzed. Simulated expansion and retreat of the Tibetan High and North Pacific High during the 2020 HW had a good agreement with the analysis. However, the model showed significant cold biases in the maximum surface temperature. It was found that the temperature bias was highly related to underestimation of downward shortwave radiation at surface, which was linked to cloudiness. KIM tended to overestimate nighttime clouds that delayed the dissipation of cloud in the morning, which affected the shortage of downward solar radiation. The vertical profiles of temperature and moisture showed that cold bias and trapped moisture in the lower atmosphere produce favorable conditions for cloud formation over the Yellow Sea, which affected overestimation of cloud in downwind land. Sensitivity test was performed to reduce model bias, which was done by modulating moisture mixing parameter in the boundary layer scheme. Results indicated that the daytime temperature errors were reduced by increase in surface solar irradiance with enhanced cloud dissipation. This study suggested that not only the synoptic features but also the accuracy of low-level temperature and moisture condition played an important role in predicting the maximum temperature during the HWs in medium-range forecasts.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 기상청 출연사업인 (재)차세대수치예보모델개발사업단의 가변격자체계 기반 통합형수치예보모델 개발(KMA2020-02212)의 지원으로 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Baek, J.-B., and Y. Kwon, 2021: Analysis of domestic heat-wave research trends. J. Soc. Disaster Inform., 17, 755-768, doi:10.15683/kosdi.2021.12.31.755 (in Korean with English abstract).
  2. Baek, S., 2017: A revised radiation package of G-packed McICA and two-stream approximation: Performance evaluation in a global weather forecasting model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 9, 1628-1640, doi:10.1002/2017MS000994.
  3. Choi, H.-J., and S.-Y. Hong, 2015: An updated subgrid orographic parameterization for global atmospheric forecast models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120, 12445-12457, doi:10.1002/2015JD024230.
  4. Choi, S.-J., and S.-Y. Hong, 2016: A global non-hydrostatic dynamical core using the spectral element method on a cubed-sphere grid. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 291-307, doi:10.1007/s13143-016-0005-0.
  5. Coumou, D., A. Robinson, and S. Rahmstorf, 2013: Global increase in record-breaking monthly-mean temperatures. Clim. Change, 118, 771-782, doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0668-1.
  6. Doelling, D. R., M. Sun, L. T. Nguyen, M. L. Nordeen, C. O. Haney, D. F. Keyes, and P. E. Mlynczak, 2016: Advances in geostationary-derived longwave fluxes for the CERES synoptic (SYN1deg) product. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 33, 503-521, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D15-0147.1.
  7. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts[ECMWF], 2018: IFS Documentation CY45R1. ECMWF.
  8. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts[ECMWF], 2020: IFS Documentation CY47R1. ECMWF.
  9. Flato, G., and Coauthors, 2013: Evaluation of climate models. In T. F. Stocker et al. Eds., Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge University Press, 741-866 pp.
  10. Ha, K.-J., J.-H. Yeo, Y.-W. Seo, E.-S. Chung, J.-Y. Moon, X. Feng, Y.-W. Lee, and C.-H. Ho, 2020: What caused the extraordinarily hot 2018 summer in Korea? J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 98, 153-167, doi:10.2151/jmsj.2020-009.
  11. Han, J.-Y., S.-Y. Hong, and Y. C. Kwon, 2020: The performance of a revised simplified Arakawa-Schubert (SAS) convection scheme in the medium-range forecasts of the Korean Integrated Model (KIM). Wea. Forecasting, 35, 1113-1128, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-19-0219.1.
  12. Hersbach, H., and Coauthors, 2020: The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999-2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803.
  13. Hong, S.-Y., and Coauthors, 2018: The Korean Integrated Model (KIM) system for global weather forecasting. Asia Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 267-292, doi:10.1007/s13143-018-0028-9.
  14. IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Cambridge University Press.
  15. Kang, J.-H., and Coauthors, 2018: Development of an observation processing package for data assimilation in KIAPS. Asia Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 303-318, doi:10.1007/s13143-018-0030-2.
  16. Kato, S., and Coauthors, 2018: Surface irradiances of edition 4.0 clouds and the Earth's radiant energy system (CERES) energy balanced and filled (EBAF) data product. J. Clim., 31, 4501-4527, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D17-0523.1.
  17. Kharin, V. V., F. W. Zwiers, X. Zhang, and G. C. Hegerl, 2007: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J. Clim., 20, 1419-1444. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4066.1
  18. Kharin, V. V., F. W. Zwiers, X. Zhang, and M. Wehner, 2013: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Clim. Change, 119, 345-357, doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8.
  19. KMA, 2019: Why? How! - Summer Forecast Guide, Korea Meteorological Administration, 170 pp (in Korean).
  20. KMA NMC, 2022: Verification of numerical weather forecasting system (2021). Korea Meteorological Administration Numerical Modeling Center, 253 pp (in Korean).
  21. Koo, M.-S., S. Baek, K.-H. Seol, and K. Cho, 2017: Advances in land modeling of KIAPS based on the Noah land surface model. Asia Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 361-373, doi:10.1007/s13143-017-0043-2.
  22. Koo, M.-S., H.-J. Choi, and J.-Y. Han, 2018: A parameterization of turbulent-scale and mesoscale orographic drag in a global atmospheric model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 8400-8417, doi:10.1029/2017JD028176.
  23. Kysely, J., and J. Kim, 2009: Mortality during heat waves in South Korea, 1991 to 2005: How exceptional was the 1994 heat wave? Clim. Res., 38, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00775
  24. Lee, E., J.-H. Kim, K.-Y. Heo, and Y.-K. Cho, 2021: Advection fog over the eastern Yellow Sea: WRF simulation and its verification by satellite and in situobservations. Remote Sens., 13, 1480, doi:10.3390/rs13081480.
  25. Lee, H.-D., K.-H. Min, J.-H. Bae, and D.-H. Cha, 2020: Characteristics and comparison of 2016 and 2018 heat wave in Korea. Atmosphere, 30, 1-15, doi:10.14191/ATMOS.2020.30.1.001 (in Korean with English ab-stract).
  26. Meehl, G. A., F. Zwiers, J. Evans, T. Knutson, L. Mearns, and P. Whetton, 2000: Trends in extreme weather and climate events: Issues related to modeling extremes in projections of future climate change. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0427:TIEWAC>2.3.CO;2
  27. Min, S.-K., Y.-H. Kim, S.-M. Lee, S. Sparrow, S. Li, F. C. Lott, and P. A. Stott, 2020: Quantifying human impact on the 2018 summer longest heat wave in South Korea. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, S103-S108, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0151.1.
  28. Park, J., and Y. Chae, 2020: Analysis of heat-related illness and excess mortality by heat waves in South Korea in 2018. J. Korean Geogr. Soc., 55, 391-408, doi:10.22776/kgs.2020.55.4.391 (in Korean with English abstract).
  29. Park, R.-S., and Y. C. Kwon, 2018: The implications for radiative cloud forcing via the link between shallow convection and planetary boundary layer mixing. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 13.203-13.218, doi:10.1029/2018JD028678.
  30. Shin, H. H., and S.-Y. Hong, 2015: Representation of the subgrid-scale turbulent transport in convective boundary layers at gray-zone resolutions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 250-271, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00116.1.
  31. Sillmann, J., V. V. Kharin, X. Zhang, F. W. Zwiers, and D. Bronaugh, 2013: Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 1716-1733, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50203.
  32. WHO, 2014: Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death, 2030s and 2050s. World Health Organization.
  33. WHO, 2017: Protecting Health in Europe from Climate Change: 2017 Update. World Health Organization.
  34. USGCRP, 2017: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I, U.S. Global Change Research Program.
  35. Yoon, D., D.-H. Cha, M.-I. Lee, K.-H. Min, S.-Y. Jun, and Y. Choi, 2021: Comparison of regional climate model performances for different types of heat waves over South Korea. J. Clim., 34, 2157-2174, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0422.1.