DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Global Trends in the Cross-border Transfer of Personal Data and Its Implications for Korea

개인정보 국외이전 관련 규범 국제 동향 분석 및 한국에의 시사점

  • Bomin-Ko (Department of International Studies, Catholic University of Korea)
  • 고보민 (가톨릭대학교 국제학부)
  • Received : 2021.12.14
  • Accepted : 2021.12.29
  • Published : 2021.12.30

Abstract

To review the theoretical background of regulatory approaches to cross-border transfer of personal data, this paper divides major digital trade participating countries into four types according to the OECD - non-regulatory, post-intervention, pre-supervision, and national control. It then analyzes the US, Japan, the EU, and China respectively that belong to each type. South Korea, which is currently about to pass the amendment by the National Assembly, has identified that it is in the middle of post-intervention and pre-supervision, and needs to evolve into pre-supervision norms like the EU while it has to participate more actively in the process of establishing international digital trade rules. Korea first needs to sign digital trade agreements and promote mutual certification projects more actively from the standpoint of a medium-sized open country with growing digital companies and digitally-open consumers. Second, the government should fully consider the interests of not only companies but also various trade stakeholders including domestic consumers, when drafting and implementing trade policies. To this end, 'a single window approach' is needed not only at the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy, but also at the level of the entire government which require an integrated form of digital trade policy governance.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, Jung-Mihn (2020), Journal of Law and Economic Regulation, 13(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.22732/CELPU.2020.13.1.59
  2. Cha, Sang-Yook (2019), "After the Max Schrems case(CJEU), the contents of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Its Implications for the Personal Information Protection Acts in Korea - focusing on A Comparative Study of Transferring Personal Data to Third Parties Abroad", Dankook Law Review, 36(1), 211-249.
  3. Choi, Kyung-Jin (2016), Analysis on EU GDPR and its Implications (Webpage). Available from https://privacy.naver.com/download/EU_GDPR.pdf (accessed November 20, 2021)
  4. Choi, Kyung-Jin (2017), "A Study of the Transborder Flow of Personal Information in International Transactions -Focusing on recent legislative trends of EU, USA and Japan", Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 26(2), 79-98.
  5. E-Daily (2021, September 28), "EDPB decided to adopt Korea's adequacy decision… Final decision left by the European Commission", Available from https://www.edaily.co.kr/news/read?newsId=03096326629184712&mediaCodeNo=257 (accessed November 20, 2021)
  6. Electronic Times Internet (2021, November 10), "Five Five organizations, including the Data Industry Association, urge the National Assembly to pass the revision of the Personal Information Protection Act", Available from https://m.etnews.com/20211110000141?obj=Tzo4OiJzdGRDbGFzcyI6Mjp7czo3OiJyZWZlcmVyIjtOO3M6NzoiZm9yd2FyZCI7czoxMzoid2ViIHRvIG1vYmlsZSI7fQ%3D%3D (accessed November 20, 2021)
  7. Francesca, C. and J. L. Gonzalez (2019), Trade and Cross-border Data Flows (OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 220), Paris: OECD, 1-40.
  8. Ham, In-Seon (2019), "Legal Issues on the Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Data -Focusing on the EU-Japan Adequacy Decisions and Their Implications", JURIS, 1(49), 475-521. https://doi.org/10.22825/JURIS.2019.1.49.012
  9. Jung, Ae-Ryung (2019), "Review of Requirements for Trans-border Flow of Personal Information", Public Law Journal, 20(2), 209-244. https://doi.org/10.31779/plj.20.2.201905.008
  10. Kang, Chul-Ha, (2017), "Legal Issues and Improvement Directions of the Trans-border Flow of Personal Information in Cloud Environments", Journal of Law and Economic Regulation, 10(2), 301-327.
  11. Kim, Hyun-Kyung (2019), "A Study on the Rationalization of 'Data Sovereignty' and "Personal Information Transfer', Sungkyunkwan Law Review, 31(4), 587-631. https://doi.org/10.17008/SKKLR.2019.31.4.015
  12. Kim, Yong-il and Yu-Jeong Ki (2021), "A Study on the Improvement Plans for Personal Information Protection Laws", Law & Policy Review, 27(1), 79-106.
  13. KISA (webpage), Available from https://gdpr.kisa.or.kr/gdpr/static/trendlink.do (accessed November 20, 2021)
  14. Ko, Bo-Min (2020) "Major Digital Trade Agreements and the Implications for the Korea-Singapore Digital Partnership Agreement (DPA)", Journal of International Trade and Commerce, 16(6), 229-248.
  15. Ko, Bo-Min (2021) "A Comparative Study of Consumer Trust in Major Digital Trade Agreements", Journal of International Trade and Commerce, 17(3), 147-165.
  16. Lee, Jae-Min (2020), "Systematic Mismatches between Digital Trade Conventional Trade Agreements - Controversies over Regulation of Personal Information and Security Exceptions", The Korean Journal of International Law, 65(2), 227-262. https://doi.org/10.46406/kjil.2020.06.65.2.227
  17. Lee, Je-Hee (2017), "Cross-border Flow of Personal Information and the Roles of the State", Public Law Journal, 18(4), 229-253.
  18. Lee, Je-Hee (2019), "Consistency in the Legal System of the Personal Protection Act", Public Law, 47(4), 429-457. https://doi.org/10.38176/PublicLaw.2019.06.47.4.429
  19. Lee, Kyung-Hee and Kyoung-Jin Choi (2018), A Legislative Study for Personal Data Protection of Overseas Korean National, (Current Issues, 2-7), Sejong City: Korea Legislation Research Institute, 1-114.
  20. Lee, Sang-Hyuk and In-Seok Kim (2016), "A Study on Transborder Data Flow of Personal Information: Policy Suggestion based on EU's Approach", Journal of The Korea Institute of Information Security and Cryptology, 26(4), 1013-1023. https://doi.org/10.13089/JKIISC.2016.26.4.1013
  21. Lie, Han-Young (2019), "Compatibility of EU Regulation on Overseas Transfer of Personal Data with GATS and Its Policy Lessons for Korea's Reciprocity Bills", Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies, 24(1), 111-143.
  22. Min, Han-Bit (2019), "A Study on Trade Rules regarding Autonomous Vehicle: Legal Issues on Cross-border Data Flows", Korean Journal of International Economic Law, 17(2), 43-78. https://doi.org/10.46271/KJIEL.2019.07.17.2.43
  23. MOTIE (2021), Submission of amendments to the Personal Information Protection Act in the digital age to the National Assembly (Personal Information Protection Policy Division) (Webpage). Available from https://www.pipc.go.kr/np/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BS074&mCode=C020010000&nttId=7565 (accessed November 20, 2021)
  24. OECD (2021), Mapping Commonalities in Regulatory Approaches to Cross-border Data Transfers, (OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 248), Paris: OECD, 1-41.
  25. Son, Hyeung-Seob (2020), "A Comparative Study of New Personal Information Protection Act in South Korea and Japan-on the transfer of data in and out of Country", Public Law Journal, 21(2), 109-143. https://doi.org/10.31779/PLJ.21.2.202005.003
  26. The European Union (webpage), Avalilable from https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection/adequacy-decisions_en (accessed November 20, 2021)
  27. UNCTAD (2021), Digital Economy Report 2021 - Cross-border Data Flows and Development: For Whom the Data Flow, UNCTAD.
  28. Woo, Ki-Hoon and Sung-Shik Shin (2020),"A Study on the Liberalization of Digital Trade and Trade Restrictiveness Factors of Data Privacy : Focusing on EU GDPR", Korea Trade Review, 45(3), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.22659/KTRA.2020.45.3.71
  29. Wu, Rihuan (2021), Chinese Personal Information Protection Act - the Main Contents and Implications (Webpage), Available from https://www.privacy.go.kr/pic/reference.do?divtype=2 (accessed November 20, 2021)
  30. Yi, Chang-Beom (2016), "Current Status and Amendment Direction of Personal Data Cross-Border Transfer Legislation in South Korea", Dankook Law Review, 36(3), 373-409.
  31. Yoon, Hyun-Seok (2021), "Trends in China's Personal Information Protection Legislation -Comparison with Korea's Personal Information Protection Law", Journal of Law and Politics Research, 21(1), 351-380. https://doi.org/10.17926/KAOLP.2021.21.1.351