DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of multiple-failure events on accident management strategy for CANDU-6 reactors

  • 투고 : 2021.02.15
  • 심사 : 2021.04.08
  • 발행 : 2021.10.25

초록

Lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident directed that multiple failures should be considered more seriously rather than single failure in the licensing bases and safety cases because attempts to take accident management measures could be unsuccessful under the high radiation environment aggravated by multiple failures, such as complete loss of electric power, uncontrollable loss of coolant inventory, failure of essential safety function recovery. In the case of the complete loss of electric power called station blackout (SBO), if there is no mitigation action for recovering safety functions, the reactor core would be overheated, and severe fuel damage could be anticipated due to the failure of the active heat sink. In such a transient condition at CANDU-6 plants, the seal failure of the primary heat transport (PHT) pumps can facilitate a consequent increase in the fuel sheath temperature and eventually lead to degradation of the fuel integrity. Therefore, it is necessary to specify the regulatory guidelines for multiple failures on a licensing basis so that licensees should prepare the accident management measures to prevent or mitigate accident conditions. In order to explore the efficiency of implementing accident management strategies for CANDU-6 plants, this study proposed a realistic accident analysis approach on the SBO transient with multiple-failure sequences such as seal failure of PHT pumps without operator's recovery actions. In this regard, a comparative study for two PHT pump seal failure modes with and without coolant seal leakage was conducted using a best-estimate code to precisely investigate the behaviors of thermal-hydraulic parameters during transient conditions. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis for different PHT pump seal leakage rates was also carried out to examine the effect of leakage rate on the system responses. This study is expected to provide the technical bases to the accident management strategy for unmitigated transient conditions with multiple failures.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS), granted financial resource from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea (No. 1805003).

참고문헌

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, IAEA, Vienna, Pub-1710, 2015.
  2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Five Years after the Fukushima Daiichi Accident: Nuclear Safety Improvements and Lessons Learnt, OECD NEA, 2016. No. 7284.
  3. M. Cherubini, N. Muellner, F. D'auria, G. Petrangeli, Application of an optimized AM procedure following a SBO in a VVER-1000, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (2008) 74-80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.04.016.
  4. Y.P. Zhang, W.X. Tian, S.Z. Qiu, G.H. Su, Transient analyses of station blackout accident for CPR1000, At. Energy Sci. Technol. 45 (2011) 1056-1059.
  5. C.W. Huh, N. Suh, G.-C. Park, Optimum RCS depressurization strategy for effective severe accident management of station black out accident, Nucl. Eng. Des. 239 (2009) 2521-2529, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.07.028.
  6. B. Chatterjee, P. Mukhopadhyay, H.G. Lele, A.K. Ghosh, H.S. Kushwaha, P. Groudev, B. Atanasova, Analyses for VVER-1000/320 reactor for spectrum of break sizes along with SBO, Ann. Nucl. Energy 37 (2010) 359-370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.12.005.
  7. B.P. Atanasova, A.E. Stefanova, P.P. Groudev, VVER 1000 SBO calculations with pressuriser relief valve stuck open with ASTEC computer code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 46 (2012) 121-127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.024.
  8. S.Y. Park, G.I. Ahn, Comparative analysis of station blackout accident progression in typical PWR, BWR, and PHWR, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 44 (2012) 311-322, https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.03.2011.046.
  9. T. Nitheanandan, M.J. Brown, Backup and ultimate heat sinks in CANDU reactors for prolonged SBO accidents, Nucl. Eng. Technol 45 (2013) 589-596, https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.03.2013.711.
  10. E. Dinca, D. Dupleac, I. Prisecaru, Verification by analytical means of the efficiency of some accident management measures for SBO at a CANDU-6 NPP, International Nuclear Safety Journal 4 (2015) 9-22.
  11. F. Zhou, D.R. Novog, RELAP5 simulation of CANDU station blackout accidents with/without water make-up to the steam generators, Nucl. Eng. Des. 318 (2017) 35-53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.04.014.
  12. P.J. Ingham, J.C. Luxat, A.J. Melnyk, T.V. Sanderson, Natural Circulation in an Integral CANDU Test Facility, IAEA, 2000, pp. 201-212. TECDOC-1149.
  13. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, MARS-KS Code Manual, KINS, 2018. KINS/RR-1822.
  14. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., Final Safety Assessment Report of Wolsong 3/4 Units, KHNP, 2019.