DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of 226Ra in TENORM Sample Considering Radon Leakage Correction

  • Lim, Sooyeon (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental, and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Syam, Nur Syamsi (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental, and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Maeng, Seongjin (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental, and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang Hoon (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental, and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2021.03.21
  • Accepted : 2021.05.28
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

Background: Phosphogypsum is material produced as a byproduct in fertilizer industry and is generally used for building materials. This material may contain enhanced radium-226 (226Ra) activity concentration compared to its natural concentration that may lead to indoor radon accumulation. Therefore, an accurate measurement method is proposed in this study to determine 226Ra activity concentration in phosphogypsum sample, considering the potential radon leakage from the sample container. Materials and Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) phosphogypsum reference material was used as a sample in this study. High-purity germanium (HPGe) gamma spectrometry was used to measure the activity concentration of the 226Ra decay products, i.e., 214Bi and 214Pb. Marinelli beakers sealed with three different sealing methods were used as sample containers. Due to the potential leakage of radon from the Marinelli beaker (MB), correction to the activity concentration resulted in gamma spectrometry is needed. Therefore, the leaked fraction of radon escaped from the sample container was calculated and added to the gamma spectrometry measured values. Results and Discussion: Total activity concentration of 226Ra was determined by summing up the activity concentration from gamma spectrometry measurement and calculated concentration from radon leakage correction method. The results obtained from 214Bi peak were 723.4 ± 4.0 Bq·kg-1 in MB1 and 719.2 ± 3.5 Bq·kg-1 in MB2 that showed about 5% discrepancy compared to the certified activity. Besides, results obtained from 214Pb peak were 741.9 ± 3.6 Bq·kg-1 in MB1 and 740.1 ± 3.4 Bq·kg-1 in MB2 that showed about 2% difference compared to the certified activity measurement of 226Ra concentration activity. Conclusion: The results show that radon leakage correction was calculated with insignificant discrepancy to the certified values and provided improvement to the gamma spectrometry. Therefore, measuring 226Ra activity concentration in TENORM (technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material) sample using radon leakage correction can be concluded as a convenient and accurate method that can be easily conducted with simple calculation.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Kyungpook National University Development Project Research Fund (2018).

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO handbook on indoor radon: a public health perspective. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.
  2. Syam NS. Radium-226 measurement reflecting leakage rates of sealing types for regulatory effectiveness on NORM and TENORM [dissertation]. Daegu, Korea: Kyungpook National University; 2020.
  3. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety. Nationwide surveillance on the environmental radiation. Daejeon, Korea: Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety; 2012.
  4. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2000.
  5. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Evaluation of EPA's guidelines for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM) [Internet]. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2000 [cited 2021 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-04/documents/402-r-00-001.pdf.
  6. Korea Land & Housing Corporation. A guideline for reduction of radioactive materials in building material. Jinju, Korea: Korea Land & Housing Corporation; 2019.
  7. Ji YY, Chung KH, Lim JM, Kim CJ, Jang M, Kang MJ, et al. Feasibility about the direct measurement of 226Ra using the gamma-ray spectrometry. J Nuc Fuel Cycle and Waste Technol. 2014;12(2):97-105. https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2014.12.2.97
  8. Lim CS, Chung KH, Kim CJ, Ji YY. A rapid analysis of 226Ra in raw materials and by-products using gamma-ray spectrometry. J Nuc Fuel Cycle and Waste Technol. 2017;15(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2017.15.1.35
  9. Tayibi H, Choura M, Lopez FA, Alguacil FJ, Lopez-Delgado A. Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum. J Environ Manag. 2009;90(8):2377-2386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.007
  10. Syam NS, Lim S, Lee HY, Lee SH. Determination of radon leakage from sample container for gamma spectrometry measurement of 226Ra. J Environ Radioact. 2020;220:106275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106275
  11. Gilmore GR. Practical gamma-ray spectrometry, 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2018. p. 315-328.