DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

X-Rays through the Looking Glass: Mobile Imaging Dosimetry and Image Quality of Suspected COVID-19 Patients

  • Received : 2020.12.10
  • Accepted : 2021.05.27
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

Background: This paper aims to evaluate the clinical utility and radiation dosimetry, for the mobile X-ray imaging of patients with known or suspected infectious diseases, through the window of an isolation room. The suitability of this technique for imaging coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is of particular focus here, although it is expected to have equal relevance to many infectious respiratory disease outbreaks. Materials and Methods: Two exposure levels were examined, a "typical" mobile exposure of 100 kVp/1.6 mAs and a "high" exposure of 120 kVp/5 mAs. Exposures of an anthropomorphic phantom were made, with and without a glass window present in the beam. The resultant phantom images were provided to experienced radiographers for image quality evaluation, using a Likert scale to rate the anatomical structure visibility. Results and Discussion: The incident air kerma doubled using the high exposure technique, from 29.47 µGy to 67.82 µGy and scattered radiation inside and outside the room increased. Despite an increase in beam energy, high exposure technique images received higher image quality scores than images acquired using lower exposure settings. Conclusion: Increased scattered radiation was very low and can be further mitigated by ensuring surrounding staff are appropriately distanced from both the patient and X-ray tube. Although an increase in incident air kerma was observed, practical advantages in infection control and personal protective equipment conservation were identified. Sites are encouraged to consider the use of this technique where appropriate, following the completion of standard justification practices.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. The Burden of Health Care-Associated Infection Worldwide [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010 [cited 2021 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/gpsc/country_work/summary_20100430_en.pdf.
  2. World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control during health care when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2021 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/10665-331495.
  3. World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2021 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/rational-use-of-personal-protective-equipment-(ppe)-for-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19).
  4. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARSCoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1564-1567. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2004973
  5. Mossa-Basha M, Medverd J, Linnau KF, Lynch JB, Wener MH, Kicska G, et al. Policies and guidelines for COVID-19 preparedness: experiences from the University of Washington. Radiology. 2020;296(2):E26-E31. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201326
  6. Brady Z, Scoullar H, Grinsted B, Ewert K, Kavnoudias H, Jarema A, et al. Technique, radiation safety and image quality for chest X-ray imaging through glass and in mobile settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2020;43(3):765-779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00899-8
  7. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. CT Image Review Self-Audit Worksheet [Internet]. Sydney, Australia: Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists; c2021 [cited 2021 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.ranzcr.com/college/document-library/ct-image-review-self-auditworksheet.
  8. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Luxembourg: European Commission; 1996.
  9. Hart D, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC. Doses to patients from radio-graphic and fluoroscopic X-ray imaging procedures in the UK: 2010 review (HPA-CRCE-034). Didcot, UK: Health Protection Agency; 2012.