산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제44권3호
  • /
  • Pages.248-261
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

첨단산업기술(6T) 연구개발사업의 효율성 분석: 2단계 네트워크 DEA 접근의 적용

Analyzing the Efficiency of National 6T R&D Projects by Two-stage Network DEA Approach

  • 남현동 (성균관대학교 국정전문대학원) ;
  • 남태우 (성균관대학교 국정전문대학원)
  • Nam, Hyundong (Graduate School of Governance, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Nam, Taewoo (Graduate School of Governance, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.11
  • 심사 : 2021.09.15
  • 발행 : 2021.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Scientific and technological performances (e.g., patents and publications) made through R&D play a pivotal role for national economic growth. National governments encourage academia-industry cooperation and thereby pursue continuous development of science technology and innovation. Increasing R&D-related investments and manpower are crucial for national industrial development, but evidence of poor performance in business performance, efficiency, and effectiveness has recently been found in Korea. This study evaluates performance efficiency of the 6T sector (Information Technology, Bio Technology, Nano Technology, Space Technology, Environment Technology, Culture Technology), which is considered a high-potential promising industry for the next generation growth and currently occupies two thirds of the national R&D projects. The study measures the relative efficiency of R&D in a comparative perspective by employing the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The result reveals overall low efficiency in basic R&D (0.2112), applied R&D (0.2083), development R&D (0.2638), and others (0.0641), confirming that economic performance and efficiency were relatively poor compared to production efficiency. Efficient R&D needs policy makers to create strategies that can increase overall efficiency by improving productivity performance and quality while increasing economic performance.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by Ministry of Education of Republic of Korea and National Research Foundation of Korea (BK21FOUR Toward Empathic Innovation: Through Platform Governance Education & Research Programs: #4199990114294).

참고문헌

  1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 1984, Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  2. Banker, R.D., Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Thrall, R.M., and Zhu, J., Returns to scale in different DEA models, European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, Vol. 154, No. 2, pp. 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00174-7
  3. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G., and Thanassoulis, E., Applied data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 1991, Vol. 52, No.1, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90331-O
  4. Brown, M.G., & Svenson, R.A., Measuring r&d productivity, Research-Technology Management, 1988, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1988.11670531
  5. Byun, S.K. and Han, J.H., Efficiency Estimations for the government driven R&D projects in IT industires, Hannam Journal of Law & Technology, 2009, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 179-206. https://doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2009.15.2.179
  6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  7. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D, The Economic Journal, 1989, Vol. 99, No. 397, pp. 569-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763
  8. Cook, W.D. and Zhu, J., Data envelopment analysis: A handbook of modeling internal structure and network, Springer, 2014.
  9. Cook, W.D., Zhu, J., Bi, G., and Yang, F., Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition, European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, Vol. 207, No. 2, pp. 1122-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.006
  10. Cullmann, A., Schmidt-Ehmcke, J., and Zloczysti, P., R&D efficiency and barriers to entry: a two stage semi-parametric DEA approach, Oxford Economic Papers, 2012, Vol. 64, No. 1, 176-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpr015
  11. Dyson, R.G., Allen, R., Camanho, A.S., Podinovski, V.V., Sarrico, C.S., and Shale, E.A., Pitfalls and protocols in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, Vol. 132, No. 2, pp. 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
  12. Emrouznejad, A. and Yang, G.L., A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978-2016, Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 2018, Vol. 61, pp. 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008
  13. Farrell, M.J., The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 1957, Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 253-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
  14. Ferretti, F., Pereira, A.G., Vertesy, D., and Hardeman, S., Research excellence indicators: time to reimagine the 'making of'?, Science and Public Policy, 2018, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp.731-741. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy007
  15. FItzsimmons, J.A. and Fitzsimmons, M.J., Service management for competitive advantage, McGraw Hill, 1994.
  16. Freeman, C. and Soete, L., Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past, Research Policy, 2009, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 583-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.018
  17. Golany, B., and Roll, Y., An application procedure for DEA, Omega, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(89)90029-7
  18. Halaskova, M., Gavurova, B., and Kocisova, K., Research and development efficiency in public and private sectors: An empirical analysis of EU countries by using DEA methodology, Sustainability, 2020, Vol. 12, No. 17, pp. 7050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177050
  19. Hong, H.D., Lee, K.H., Park, K.P., and Hwang, B.Y., The Impact of Organizational Competencies on the Performance of R&D Management Agencies in Korea, Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2018, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 788-817.
  20. Hong, S.G., Hong, S.K., and Ahn, D.H., A Study on R&D investment flows between industrial sector and analysis of the effects on the increase of direct and indirect Productivity, Sejong: Science and Technology Policy Institute, 1991.
  21. Hsu, F.M. and Hsueh, C.C., Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: A three-stage approach, Evaluation and Program Planning, 2009, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.10.005
  22. Hwang, S.W., Ahn, D.H., Choi, S.H., Kwon, S.H., Chun, D.P., Kim. A.R., and Park, J.H., Efficiency of national R&D investment, Sejong: Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2009.
  23. Jiang, B., Chen, H., Li, J., and Lio, W., The uncertain two-stage network DEA models, Soft Computing, 2021, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05157-3
  24. Jimenez-Saez, F., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M., Zofio, J.L., and Castro-Martinez, E, Evaluating research efficiency within National R&D Programmes, Research Policy, 2011, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 230-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.005
  25. Kao, C. and Hwang, S.N., Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan, European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, Vol. 185, No. 1, pp. 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041
  26. Kil, J.B., Jung, B.K., and Yeom, J.H., Government-funded Research Institutes, Agency Problem and Project Based System(PBS), Korean Review of Organizational Studies, 2009, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 179-202. https://doi.org/10.21484/kros.2009.6.2.179
  27. Kim, T.H., A Study on the Way to Enhance Research Performance out of the International Joint Projects under the Framework of National R&D Programs, Focusing Basic and Fundamental Technology, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2012, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 400-420.
  28. Kim, Y.H., and Kim, S.K., An Analysis on the R&D Productivity and Efficiency of Korea: Focused on Comparison with the OECD Countries, Journal of Technology Innovation, 2011, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 1-27.
  29. Lee, H., Kim, M.S., Yee, S.R., and Choe, K., R&D performance monitoring, evaluation, and management system: A model and methods, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2011, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877011002301
  30. Lee, H., Park, Y., and Choi, H., Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, Vol. 196, No. 3, pp. 847-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.016
  31. Lee, H.Y., and Park, Y.T., An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2005, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2005.9668614
  32. Lee, K.J., Lee, J.J., Son, B.H., Hwang, B.Y., Kang, H.K., Ahn, B.M., Kim, J.Y., Han, S.Y., Chun, S.B., and Kwon, M.H., A Study on the Analysis of Major S&T Issues and Deduction of Policy Direction, Chungcheongbuk-do: Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, 2009.
  33. Lee, W.S., Lee, J.O., Hwang, S.W., Lee, J.D., Hwang, W.S., Yang, H.W., Hong, C.Y., Jung, S.M., Kim, B.H., and Yi, S.G., Development of Korean R&D-based Macroeconomic Model and CGE Model, Sejong: Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2012.
  34. Liang, L., Cook, W.D., and Zhu, J., DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition, Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 2008, Vol. 55, No. 7, pp. 643-653. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20308
  35. Liang, L., Yang, F., Cook, W.D., and Zhu, J., DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation, Annals of Operations Research, 2006, Vol. 145, No. 1, pp. 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0026-7
  36. Nam, H.D., Oh, M.J., and Nam, T.W., R&D efficiency of OECD member countries: Evaluation and Suggestions, The Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 2020, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 249-273. https://doi.org/10.32956/kopoms.2020.31.3.249
  37. Odagiri, H. and Murakami, N., Private and quasi-social rates of return on pharmaceutical R&D in Japan, Research Policy, 1992, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90032-Y
  38. Park, C.I. and Seo, H.J., The Efficiency and Productivity Change in the National R&D Projects of 6T Sectors, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 2018, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 293-325. https://doi.org/10.22558/jieb.2018.02.31.1.293
  39. Porter, M.E. and Stern, S., Measuring the "ideas" production function: Evidence from international patent output, NBER Working Paper, 2000, w7891.
  40. Rhim, H.S., Yoo, S.C., and Kim, Y.S., DEA/AHP Hybrid Model for Evaluation & Selection of R & D Projects, Journal of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 1999, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 1-12.
  41. Rogers, S., Performance management in local government, Longman, 1990.
  42. Wang, E.C. and Huang, W., Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach, Research Policy, 2007, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 260-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.004
  43. Wang, E.C., R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach, Journal of Policy Modeling, 2007, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2006.12.005
  44. Yoo, S.C., Meng, J., and Lim, S.M., An analysis of the performance of global major airports using two-stage network DEA model, Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 2017, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 65-92. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.1.065
  45. Zhu, J., Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets, 3ed., Springer, 2014.