1. Introduction
Concerning an enterprise, the consumption of goods is always an important issue, deciding the existence and development of the business. Especially in the current competitive period, when goods have to be standardized, the quality of goods brought to the market must be guaranteed (Stern & Reve, 1980). Therefore, distribution channels play an essential role in bringing the company's products to most consumers (Weitz & Jap, 1995). A distribution channel is considered valuable when it provides products and services to customers in the best way at the right time, place, and product needs (Nevin, 1995; Stern & Reve, 1980). The reason is that classical discrete distributions are no longer suitable for large and numerous transactions of enterprises today. Therefore, the formation of distribution channels helps businesses better deploy the process of bringing products to consumers (Frazier, 1983a, 1983b, 1999; Stern & Reve, 1980).
Besides developing distribution channels, to develop a company in both the short and long term, having overall development strategies plays an important role (Felício & Freire, 2016). The strategy given to help the company achieve its business goals is based on internal and external business assessments (Soltanizadeh, Rasid, Golshan, & Ismail, 2016). Furthermore, the company's strategy will help increase the competitiveness of the business based on the competitive advantages offered, such as cost minimization, differentiation, focus strategy (Porter, 1985). Therefore, it can be seen that the strategic factor is an essential factor in improving the competitive advantage as well as the operational efficiency of the enterprise.
FDI enterprises play an important role in the economies of developing countries such as Vietnam (Ho, Bui, Nguyen, Dao, & Nguyen, 2021). From 1990 to 2020, Vietnam attracts 7 billion USD annually. In the period 2011 to 2019, FDI enterprises contributed 25.7% to Vietnam's economic growth. In 2010, FDI contributed about 13% of GDP and increased to 19.6% of GDP in 2019. Contributing to the labor force, the number of employees working in FDI enterprises is about 6.1 million people. Regarding average income, the average income of workers in the FDI enterprise sector is about 11.2 million VND/month, which is 1.2 times higher than the average income of the economy.
There have been many studies showing the relationship between distribution channels, strategy factors, and firm performance. Significant studies have shown that developing, diversifying distribution channels and strategy factors will help increase firm performance (Aulakh & Kotabe, 1997; Felício & Freire, 2016). However, studies on strategy or distribution channels are limited in Vietnam, so this study is conducted to show the relationship between strategy factors, distribution channels, and firm performance in enterprises. Strategy factor to firm performance and evaluate the mediating effect of the distribution channel between strategy factor - firm performance in Vietnamese FDI enterprises. The research results will help businesses have sensible policies to improve firm performance through distribution channels and strategy factors.
2. Literature reviews
2.1. Distribution channels and firm performance
There are many definitions of firm performance, and there is no one specific definition of firm performance due to complex models in organizations (Richard, Devinney, Yip, & Johnson, 2009). Firm performance reflects the efficiency or consumption rate of inputs and outputs in the production and operation processes of the enterprise (Felício & Freire, 2016; Klumpes, 2004). In addition, firm performance is also defined in revenue growth or profit expectations (Waterman & Peters, 1982). Besides, firm performance is also assessed by the firm's share in the competitive market (Wiersema & Bantel, 1992). In this study, firm performance is defined by revenue growth, profit growth, and market share, as well as market competition by Waterman and Peters (1982), and Wiersema and Bantel (1992).
Distribution channels refer to the network used to receive the product from the manufacturer or its creators and ultimately to the end-users. When the distribution channel is "direct" (direct sales channel), the manufacturer sells directly to the user without an intermediary. When the distribution channel is indirect, the products will be distributed through many channels before reaching the final consumer. The construction of distribution channels aims to serve product market development (McNaughton, 2002; Rosli & Radiah, 2012; Yoon, Song, & Kang, 2021). Distribution channel performance affects the firm performance of all financial as well as non-financial firms (Aulakh & Kotabe, 1997; Felício & Freire, 2016). Many researchers also believe that a good distribution channel will help improve the firm performance of the business (Etgar, 1978). Therefore, the research hypothesis is established as follows:
H1: Distribution channels has a positive impact on firm performance
2.2. Stratergy factor, distribution and firm performance
According to Felício and Freire (2016), strategy factor is the simultaneous use of factors: human resources (using human resources to bring success to the business); channels used (strategy to use the number of channels in the business plan); subscription risk (related to risk management that may occur in the business process), financial resources (a strategy of using financial resources as well as cash flow for a long term strategy to bring success to the company); and product - service innovation (product innovation aimed at increasing customer satisfaction). Strategy factors play an essential role in improving firm performance (Felício & Freire, 2016). The strategy for distribution channels helps to expand the market of the enterprise not only in production but also in the company (Frazier, 1999). At the same time, the diversification of distribution channels also helps to meet better the needs of customers (Tsai & Yang, 2013). Therefore, the research hypothesis is put forward as follows:
H2: Strategy factor has a positive impact on distribution channels
H3: Strategy factor has a positive impact on firm performance
Figure 1: Research model
3. Method
3.1. Measurement scales
The three constructs in the research model, including strategy factor, distribution channels, and firm performance, are used scales developed from previous research in literature review. In which: the items of strategy factors are adapted from Felício and Freire (2016); Distribution channels is adapted from Coelho and Easingwood (2005); Frazier (1999). The firm performance adapted from Trainor, Rapp, Beitelspacher, and Schillewaert (2011). The scale all used is Likert scale’s five point with 1 point – completely disagree to 5 point – completely agreed (see table 1).
Table 1: Demographic information of respondents (n = 210)
3.2. Data collection
The survey was built through the reverse translation of Brislin (1970) from English to Vietnamese and from Vietnam to English. To ensure a clear and concise questionnaire, the questionnaire was sent to five officials in the enterprise to check and comment on the questionnaire's content before being sent out. After editing the questionnaire contents through five employees in the enterprise, the official survey questionnaire was distributed in the online form (due to the complexity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the direct formation of voting is not feasible). Survey subjects are leaders or managers in enterprises who directly or indirectly manage the distribution channels of the company or the leaders of the enterprise. Data was collected through online questionnaires for FDI enterprises nationwide in Vietnam. Because the number of FDI enterprises in some provinces is not large enough, we surveyed so many regions in Vietnam (the provinces with industrial clusters have many FDI enterprises). The survey results from February 2021 to April 2021 obtained 210 responses. With 210 samples considered suitable for multivariate data analysis (Hair, Sarstedt, Hopkins, & Kuppelwieser, 2014; Nguyen, Nguyen, & Nguyen, 2020).
3.3. Data analysis
The collected data will be recoded and put into Smart-PLS software for analysis. The main data analysis method of the study is partial least squares (PLS) with the PLS-SEM model. Testing for the convergence of factors will be performed through the index of outer loading greater than 0.5 and the average variance extracted (AVE) greater than 50%. At the same time, the factor achieved reliability when measuring the path through the observed variables when the composite reliabilities (CR) were greater than 0.7 and Cronbach's Alpha coefficient > 0.7. In addition, to ensure that the factors must be completely distinguishable, the discriminant test is based on the quadratic value of AVE, which is larger than the correlation coefficients (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).
4. Research results
4.1. Sample characteristics
With 210 samples collected, the proportion of men is higher than that of women (159 men account for 75.7% and 51 women accounts for 24.3%). The age group accounting for the largest proportion is from 31 to 40 years old with 95 people accounting for 45.2%, followed by the group of over 40 years old with 71 people accounting for 33.8%, and finally the group under 30 years old with 44 people accounting for 21%. The education level of the survey respondents is mainly university with 158 people, accounting for 74.8%, followed by the group of graduate students with 50 people, accounting for 23.8%, and finally the college group with three people accounting for 1.4%. In terms of income, 108 respondents accounting for 51.4% having income from 10 to 20 million. It is followed by 85 people accounting for 40.5% with over 20 million; the smallest portion belongs to 17 people accounting for 8.1% with under 10 million.
4.2. Assessment of the measurement model
The test results for the convergence of the factors showed that the factors all reached the convergence value with the outer loading coefficients all greater than 0.5 and the AVE values were all greater than 50%. In addition, Cronbach's Alpha coefficient is both greater than 0.7 and CR is also greater than 0.7, indicating that all factors are reliable (see Table 2).
Table 2: Scales’ evaluation
Notes: CR: Composite reliability; AVE: Average variance extracted
The results of the discriminant analysis of the factors are shown in Table 3. The results show that the factors are discriminant when the Square root of AVE is greater than the coefficients correlation. At the same time, the average assessment of factors indicates that all three factors of strategy factors, distribution channels, and firm performance are rated at a reasonable level (mean scores are from 3.90 to 4.15 on a 5-point scale).
Table 3: Discriminant validity analysis
* Square root of AVE.
4.4. Hypothesis testing results
The results of the PLS-SEM model analysis show that the Strategy factor has a significant positive effect on the distribution channel (beta=0.409 and p-value=000). Therefore, hypothesis H1 is accepted. When a business has a good company development strategy, it will be the cause to promote the development of distribution channels to meet the planned target. Both the change in financial strategy in product and technology innovation have forced distribution channels to be transformed positively to create enough capacity for distributing products and services to the market. In addition to resource and innovation strategies, risk prevention strategies also help businesses limit predictable risks. Thereby, companies can adjust distribution channels when facing risks in business activities. The distribution channel system for risk prevention for the distribution channel system is more fully completed and has greater flexibility. The results of this study are consistent with previous studies by Felício and Freire (2016), which both show a positive influence of strategy factor on distribution channels.
At the same time, Strategy factors have a statistically significant positive effect on firm performance (beta=0.243 and p-value=0.000). Therefore, hypothesis H1 is accepted. The corporate strategy indicates a long-term development vision for the business, with the preparation of financial and human resources to help the company quickly achieve the set plans. The strategy is implemented to increase business revenue and expand market share, increasing the competitiveness of enterprises in the market. The introduction of innovative strategies has resulted in higher business efficiency for enterprises. In more detail, the technological innovation which aims to change a product or service is achieving positive outcomes when it has brought good revenue and met changing market expectations. At the same time, the provision for possible risks in business activities is giving businesses positive signs. Risk measurement or risk control is being taken seriously and effectively. Risk cases have been planned by the enterprise to respond, make the business plan not affected much when these risks occur. Therefore, preparing to measure or predict risks has reduced damage to the business and improved business results. Previous studies also support this finding by Felício and Freire (2016).
Distribution channels have a statistically significant positive effect on firm performance (beta=0.422 and p-value=0.000). Therefore, hypothesis H3 is accepted. Developing distribution channels makes firm performance of enterprises increase. In addition, the results of this study also show that distribution channels are mediators between strategy factors - firm performance. We can see that the number of distribution channels increases as well as the diversity of channels to help businesses better distribute their products. These distribution channels make the product sold more to the market, help to increase the revenue as well as the market share of the company. As an intermediate variable, it shows that the strategic factors of a good business promote the development of distribution channels, and distribution channels also increase the firm performance of the company. The results of this study are similar to previous studies by Felício and Freire (2016) when showing the intermediary role of distribution channels between strategy factors - firm performance. We can see that three factors in the research model have a positive relationship with each other. In particular, the strategic factor plays an initial role in promoting the development of the distribution channel and, at the same time, increasing the firm performance of the company.
Figure 2: PLS-SEM result
Table 4: The result of PLS-SEM
*** significant at 1%
5. Conclusion
Research has shown that surveyed businesses have a good assessment of the business's strategy in the future. At the same time, such strategies also show that promoting distribution channels is also very good for companies. With good preparation for the supply chain as well as a clear development strategy, businesses have also assessed the firm performance at a reasonable level. In particular, through PLS-SEM analysis with 210 samples, it has been demonstrated that the positive influence of strategy factors on distribution channels and firm performance. In addition, the results also indicate the mediating role of distribution channels in the effect of strategy on firm performance. This once again confirms the important role of strategy as well as distribution channels in increasing firm performance. From this result, companies can improve firm performance through two factors strategy and distribution channels in Vietnamese FDI enterprises.
6. Implications
6.1. Theoretical implications
Research has shown a positive relationship between strategy factors, distribution channels, and firm performance. This study will further confirm the theory of these relationships in the context of the economy of Vietnam - a developing country with a solid tendency towards international economic integration. The study will be an essential document for the following researchers to add to the theoretical basis for the relationship between strategy factors, distribution channels, and firm performance. Especially, when researchers research developing countries, this will be a necessary reference study in building research models.
6.2. Practical implications
From the results, the positive impact of strategic factors on firm performance will suggest businesses improve firm performance. Focusing on strategy factors will help improve the firm performance of the company. Financial strategies, or human resources, need to be planned in the long term to create long-term preparation for business activities in the enterprise. At the same time, detailed risk prevention strategies will help businesses deal with bad situations that may occur in the production and business process. This reduces losses for companies when there are timely handling measures when risks arise. In addition, businesses need to have a strategy related to innovation for products/services to improve competitiveness. The change in activities, products, or services will better meet the changing needs of the market as well as customers. In addition, the innovation strategy also makes an imitation of competitors challenging to achieve when the product or service life cycle process is not always long enough for competitors to imitate. Distribution channels have a positive effect on firm performance, helping businesses plan to adjust distribution channels. Expanding distribution channels or diversifying distribution channels will enable companies to increase their ability to distribute to the market. Thereby, it helps to increase the revenue as well as the market share of the FDI enterprises.
References
- Aulakh, P. S., & Kotabe, M. (1997). Antecedents and Performance Implications of Channel Integration in Foreign Markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), 145-175. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490096
- Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
- Etgar, M. (1978). The Effects of Forward Vertical Integration on Service Performance of a Distributive Industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 26(3), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.2307/2097868
- Felicio, J. A., & Freire, C. R. (2016). From customer motivation to corporate performance. The role of strategic factors and distribution channels of financial service firms. Service Business, 10(1), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0260-z
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
- Frazier, G. L. (1983a). On the Measurement of Interfirm Power in Channels of Distribution. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378302000206
- Frazier, G. L. (1983b). Interorganizational Exchange Behavior in Marketing Channels: A Broadened Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298304700408
- Frazier, G. L. (1999). Organizing and managing channels of distribution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399272007
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
- Ho, T. N., Bui, A. T., Nguyen, V. D., Dao, T. K., & Nguyen, N. D. (2020). Analyzing the impact of FDI and urbanization on CO2 emission in Vietnam. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 27(3), 313-332.
- Klumpes, P. J. M. (2004). Performance Benchmarking in Financial Services: Evidence from the UK Life Insurance Industry. The Journal of Business, 77(2), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1086/381281
- McNaughton, R. B. (2002). The use of multiple export channels by smallknowledge-intensive firms. International Marketing Review, 19(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330210425033
- Nevin, J. R. (1995). Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels: Exploring Fundamental Issues. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300413
- Nguyen, D. N., Nguyen, D. D., & Nguyen, D. V. (2020). Distribution information safety and factors affecting the intention to use digital banking in Vietnam. The Journal of Distribution Science, 18(6), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.6.202006.83
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039075
- Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560
- Rosli, M. M., & Radiah, A. K. (2012). Innovation in Distribution Channel, Cost Efficiency & Firm Performance: The Case of Indonesian Small & Medium Enterprise Scales. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 2(4), 102-111.
- Soltanizadeh, S., Abdul Rasid, S. Z., Mottaghi Golshan, N., & Wan Ismail, W. K. (2016). Business strategy, enterprise risk management and organizational performance. Management Research Review, 39(9), 1016-1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2015-0107
- Stern, L. W., & Reve, T. (1980). Distribution Channels as Political Economies: A Framework for Comparative Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 44(3), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298004400306
- Trainor, K. J., Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L. S., & Schillewaert, N. (2011). Integrating information technology and marketing: An examination of the drivers and outcomes of e-Marketing capability. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(1), 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.05.001
- Tsai, K.-H., & Yang, S.-Y. (2013). Firm innovativeness and business performance: The joint moderating effects of market turbulence and competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1279-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.06.001
- Waterman, R. H., & Peters, T. J. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.
- Weitz, B. A., & Jap, S. D. (1995). Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300411
- Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91-121. https://doi.org/10.5465/256474
- Yoon, S.-H., Song, S.-Y., & Kang, M.-S. (2021). Factors Influencing the Attractiveness of Cosmetics Distribution Channels. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(7), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.7.202107.75
Cited by
- What are the Factors that influence the Revitalization of the Health and Beauty Stores in Distribution Channels? vol.19, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.12.202112.103