Women's Health Nursing (여성건강간호학회지)

Korean Society of Women Health Nursing (한국여성건강간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Psychometric properties of an instrument 3: convergent, discriminant, known-groups, and criterion validity

측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 3: 수렴, 판별, 집합 및 준거타당도

  • Received : 2021.08.12
  • Accepted : 2021.08.18
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.

수렴, 판별 및 집합타당도를 검정하기 위해서는 연구자가 선행연구 결과를 바탕으로 검증하고자 하는 도구와 비교측정도구로 측정한 점수의 상관관계의 정도와 방향에 대한 가설을 세우고 시행해야 한다. 분석결과가 사전에 기획하였던 가설을 만족하였을 때, 그 타당도가 만족하였다고 할 수 있다. 준거타당도는 검정하고자 하는 도구가 측정하는 개념과 같은 개념을 측정하는 표준화된 도구가 있는 경우에 실시한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) (NRF-2021R1A2B01001603). The funder did not play any role in the conduct or publication of the study.

References

  1. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
  2. Lee EH, Lee YW, Lee KW, Nam M, Kim SH. A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: development and psychometric evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;88:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002
  3. Lee EH, van der Bijl J, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Han SJ, Moon SH. Psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:780701. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/780701
  4. Lee EH, Kang EH, Kang HJ. Evaluation of studies on the measurement properties of self-reported instruments. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020;14(5):267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2020.11.004
  5. de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. London: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
  6. Lee J, Lee EH, Chae D, Kim CJ. Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: a systematic review of measurement properties. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;105:103498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103498
  7. Polit DF, Yang FM. Measurement and the measurement of change. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.
  8. Lee EH, Lee KW, Song R, Snoek FJ, Moon SH. Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R) for patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-77
  9. Arbuckle RA, Humphrey L, Vardeva K, Arondekar B, Danten-Viala M, Scott JA, Snoek FJ. Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R)-a measure of symptom distress. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1168-1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00571.x
  10. Mokkink LB, de Vet HC, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
  11. Lee EH, Kwon O, Hahm KB, Kim W, Kim JI, Cheung DY, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome-specific health-related quality of life instrument: development and psychometric evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0423-9

Cited by

  1. Year in review and appreciation for 2021 reviewers vol.27, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.12.13