Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology (한국동물생명공학회지)

The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology (한국동물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic diversity and relationship of Korean chicken breeds using 12 microsatellite markers

  • Kim, Yesong (Department of Applied Biotechnology, The Graduate School of Hankyong National University) ;
  • Yun, Ji Hye (Department of Applied Biotechnology, The Graduate School of Hankyong National University) ;
  • Moon, Seon Jeong (Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation) ;
  • Seong, Jiyeon (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Kong, Hong Sik (Department of Applied Biotechnology, The Graduate School of Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2021.08.25
  • Accepted : 2021.09.22
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A number of Korean Chicken breeds were registered in Domestic Animal Diversity Information System (DAD-IS, http://dad.fao.org/) of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationship of local breeds is an important factor towards the identification of unique and valuable genetic resources. Therefore, this study aimed to analysis the genetic diversity and relationship of 22 Korean Chicken breeds using 12 microsatellite (MS) markers. The mean number of alleles for each variety was 5.52, ranging from a 3.75 (Leghorn F; NF) to a 7.0 (Ross). The most diverse breed was the Hanhyup3 (HCC), which had the highest expected heterozygosity (HExp) (0.754) and polymorphic information content (PIC) (0.711). The NF was the least diverse population, having the lowest HExp (0.467) and PIC (0.413). As a result of the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) confirmed that Hy-line Brown (HL) and Lohmann Brown (LO) are very close to each other and that Leghorn and Rhode Island Red (RIR) are clearly distinguished from other groups. Thus, the reliability and power of identification using 12 types of MS markers were improved, and the genetic diversity and probability of individual discrimination were confirmed through statistical analysis. This study is expected to be used as basic data for the identification of Korean chicken breeds, and our results indicated that these multiplex PCR marker sets will have considerable applications in population genetic structure analysis.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by Golden Seed Project, funded by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) [PJ01282005202101 (213010055WT251)].

References

  1. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. 2003. GENETIX version 4.04. Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Universite de Montpellier II, France.
  2. Berthouly C, Bed'Hom B, Tixier-Boichard M, Chen CF, Lee YP, Laloe D, Legros H, Verrier E, Rognon X. 2008. Using molecular markers and multivariate methods to study the genetic diversity of local European and Asian chicken breeds. Anim. Genet. 39:121-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01703.x
  3. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32:314-331.
  4. Cheng HH and Crittenden LB. 1994. Microsatellite markers for genetic mapping in the chicken. Poult. Sci. 73:539-546. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730539
  5. Choi NR, Seo DW, Jemaa SB, Sultana H, Heo KN, Jo C, Lee JH. 2015. Discrimination of the commercial Korean native chicken population using microsatellite markers. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 57:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-015-0044-6
  6. Choi SS, Seo JH, Han JM, Seong J, Lee JH, Kong HS. 2019. The development of multiplex PCR microsatellite marker sets for Korean chicken breeds. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 18:492-498. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.492.498
  7. Crooijmans RP, Groen AF, Van Kampen AJ, Van der Beek S, Van der Poel JJ, Groenen MA. 1996. Microsatellite polymorphism in commercial broiler and layer lines estimated using pooled blood samples. Poult. Sci. 75:904-909. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750904
  8. Heo KN, Choo HJ, Seo BY, Park MN, Jung KC, Hwangbo J, Kim HK, Hong EC, Seo OS, Kang BS. 2011. Investigation of TYR and MC1R polymorphisms in Korean native chickens and the commercial chickens. CNU J. Agric. Sci. 38:465-471.
  9. Hillel J, Groenen MA, Tixier-Boichard M, Korol AB, David L, Kirzhner VM, Burke T, Barre-Dirie A, Crooijmans RP, Elo K, Feldman MW, Freidlin PJ, Maki-Tanila A, Oortwijn M, Thomson P, Vignal A, Wimmers K, Weigend S. 2003. Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet Sel Evol. 35:533-557. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-35-6-533
  10. Jung JS, Seong J, Lee GH, Kim Y, An JH, Yun JH, Kong HS. 2021. Genetic diversity and relationship of Halla horse based on polymorphisms in microsatellites. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 36:76-81. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.36.2.76
  11. Kong HS, Oh JD, Lee JH, Jo KJ, Sang BD, Choi CH, Kim SD, Lee SJ, Yeon SH, Jeon GJ, Lee HK. 2006. Genetic variation and relationships of Korean native chickens and foreign breeds using 15 microsatellite markers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1546-1550. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1546
  12. Park MN, Hong EC, Kang BS, Kim HK, Kim JH, Na SH, Chae HS, Seo OS, Han JY, Jeong JH, Hwangbo J. 2010. Chemical composition and meat quality of crossbred Korean native chickens (KNC). Korean J. Poult. Sci. 37:415-421. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2010.37.4.415
  13. Park SDE. 2001. The Excel microsatellite toolkit (version 3.1). Animal Genomics Laboratory, University College Dublin, Ireland. http://animalgenomics.ucd.ie/sdepark/ms-toolkit/
  14. Roh HJ, Kim KW, Lee J, Jeon D, Kim SC, Ko YG, Mun SS, Lee HJ, Lee JH, Oh DY, Byeon JH, Cho CY. 2019. Genetic diversity of Korean native chicken populations in DAD-IS database using 25 microsatellite markers. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 46:65-75. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2019.46.2.65
  15. Saitou N and Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
  16. Seo D, Lee DH, Choi N, Sudrajad P, Lee SH, Lee JH. 2018. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium and analysis of genetic diversity in Korean chicken lines. PLoS One 13:e0192063. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192063
  17. Seo DW, Hoque MR, Choi NR, Sultana H, Park HB, Heo KN, Kang BS, Lim HT, Lee SH, Jo C, Lee JH. 2013. Discrimination of korean native chicken lines using fifteen selected microsatellite markers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 26:316-322. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12469
  18. Seo JH, Lee JH, Kong HS. 2017. Assessment of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Korean native chicken breeds using microsatellite markers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 30:1365-1371. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0514
  19. Seo JH, Oh JD, Lee JH, Seo D, Kong HS. 2015. Studies on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Korean native chicken using the microsatellite marker. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 42:15-26. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.42.1.15
  20. Suh S, Sharma A, Lee S, Cho CY, Kim JH, Choi SB, Kim H, Seong HH, Yeon SH, Kim DH, Ko YG. 2014. Genetic diversity and relationships of Korean chicken breeds based on 30 microsatellite markers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1399-1405. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14016
  21. Tantia MS, Vijh RK, Mishra B, Kumar STB, Arora R. 2006. Multilocus genotyping to study population structure in three buffalo populations of India. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1071-1078. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1071
  22. Weir BS and Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408641
  23. Wright DJ. 1965. General multiplicity theory. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s3-15:269-288. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-15.1.269