DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the effect of online learning according to the difference between personal and social motivation after COVID-19

COVID-19 이후 개인적 동기와 사회적 동기차이에 따른 온라인 학습효과 연구

  • Chin, HongKun (Department of Media & Communication, Kookmin University)
  • 진홍근 (국민대학교 언론정보학부)
  • Received : 2021.06.14
  • Accepted : 2021.09.20
  • Published : 2021.09.28

Abstract

As a result, the interaction between personal motivation and class type is not significant. On the other hand, the interaction between social motivation and class type is significant and overall online class increases engagement with educational issues. In particular, the group with low social motivation showed greater change than the group with high social motivation, so online education seems to be more effective in the group with low social motivation. It means that by stimulating students' social motivation rather than personal motivation, the effectiveness of online education can be enhanced, and it can lead to education outcomes - behavioral changes and attitudes of learners. In order to revitalize social motivation in the intensely personal space of online, it is necessary to activate social communication methods such as SNS, and development of interpersonal issues and learning materials would be more efficient. In order to derive more specific results, it is necessary to measure the level of prior knowledge and involvement of the participants in class, and to comprehensively investigate and analyze the state of learners before and after class through more variables. Finally, in order to increase the reliability of the research results, it is necessary to clearly prove it through the establishment of a structural model.

본 연구는 코로나 바이러스의 유행으로 급격한 온라인 수업으로의 전환이 학습 효과에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 동일주제 과목 오프라인 수업과 온라인 수업의 형태에 따른 학습효과를 비교 분석하고자 하였다. 동일 과목의 오프라인 수강생 105명과 온라인 수강생 244명을 집단 비교하였고 개인적 동기 수준과 사회적 동기 수준의 차이로 분류하여 통일관련 인게이먼트에 미치는 상호작용 효과를 알아보고자 Two-way ANOVA 분석을 통해 검증하였다. 연구 결과 개인적 동기와 수업유형 간에는 상호작용이 나타나지 않았다. 반면에 사회적 동기의 경우 수업 유형에 따라 상호작용이 있는 것으로 나타났으며 전반적으로 온라인 교육이 교육 이슈에 대한 인게이지먼트를 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 사회적 동기가 낮은 집단의 변화가 사회적 동기가 높은 집단의 변화보다 큰 것으로 나타나 온라인 교육이 사회적 동기가 낮은 집단에 오히려 효과가 있는 것으로 보인다. 이러한 결과는 온라인 교육의 효과를 얻기 위해서는 개인적 동기 보다는 사회적 동기를 자극함으로써 학습 결과인 학습자의 행동적 변화와 태도를 유도할 수 있을 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Mitchell. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of educational psychology, 85(3), 424-436. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.85.3.424
  2. R. G. Geen, W. W. Beatty & R. M Arkin. (1984). Human motivation: Physiological, behavioral, and social approaches. Allyn & Bacon.
  3. E. T. Higgins. (2000). Does personality provide unique explanations for behaviour? Personality as cross-person variability in general principles. European Journal of Personality, 14(5), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0984(200009/10)14:5<391::AID-PER394>3.0.CO;2-6
  4. E. T. Higgins. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological review, 113(3), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439
  5. Tao. (2013). Personality, Motivation, and Behavioral intentions in the experiential consumption of artworks. Social behavior and Personality, 41(9), 1533-1546. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.9.1533
  6. R. Lawson & M. Thyne. (2000). Destination avoidance. Reflections on International Tourism: Motivations, Behaviour and Tourist Types, 255-266.
  7. D. Jonassen, M. Davison, M. Collins, J. Campbell & B. B. Haab. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885
  8. K. C. Nam, H. C. Lim & K. J. Hwang. (2002). A study of On-line on training effectiveness. Journal of the Korean Operation Research and Management Science Society. 27(1), 75-94. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE00310503
  9. P. Kotler & J. Scheff. (1997). Standing room only: Strategies for marketing the performing arts. Harvard Business School Press.
  10. R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. E. Higgins. (1986). Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. Guilford Press, New York.
  11. M. Csikszentmihalyi. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York.
  12. E. Ephron. (2006). Media Planning-From Recency to Engagement. ICFAI Books.
  13. P. R. Pintrich & E. V. DeGroot. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Education Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  14. R. M. Carini, G. D. Kuh & V Klein. (2006). Student engagement and student learning : Testing the linkage. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
  15. A. Wang. (2006). Advertising Engagement: A driver of message involvement on message effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(4), 355-368. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849906060429