디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권9호
  • /
  • Pages.411-421
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

간호학생에게 적용한 학습자질문중심학습법과 온라인 퀴즈기반학습법의 효과: 기초간호학 교과목을 중심으로

The effect of student-generated questions and online quiz-based learning applied to nursing students; focused on biological nursing science subjects

  • 투고 : 2021.06.26
  • 심사 : 2021.09.20
  • 발행 : 2021.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 학습자질문중심학습법과 온라인 퀴즈기반학습법을 생리학과 약리학 교과목에 순차적으로 적용하고 학습에 대한 효과를 비교하고자 간호학과 학생 총 173명을 대상으로 수행되었다. 전체 학생들의 학습동기는 8주차에 비해 15주차에 유의하게 낮아졌고(T=2.843, p=.005), 두 학습법을 적용한 순서에 따라서도 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나, 약리학 교과목 학습자들의 학습만족도는 온라인 퀴즈기반학습법만을 적용하였을 때 학습자질문중심학습법을 적용하였을 때보다 유의하게 높았다(t=2.184, p=.003). 본 연구 결과, 기초간호학교과목에 학습자질문중심학습법과 온라인 퀴즈기반학습법 중 어느 것이 더 효과적이라고 말할 수 없으며 순차적인 병용효과도 없으므로, 향후 수업 설계에서는 한 과목에 단일 학습법을 적용하거나 두 가지 학습법을 처음부터 병행하여 사용할 것을 제안한다.

This study was conducted to compare the effects of student-generated questions (SGQ) and online quiz-based learning (OQL) applied to a physiology and a pharmacology course with 173 nursing students in total. The levels of learning motivation of all participants at 15th week decreased significantly compared with 8th week. There were no statistical difference on learning motivation, communication, and critical thinking between SGQ and OQL, and regardless of the order SGQ and OQL were applied. However, the level of learning satisfaction in students taking pharmacology course was significantly higher in OQL than SGQ (t=2.184, p=.003). We suggest that either SGQ or OQL or both SGQ and OQL be used throughout a semester in biological nursing science subjects without changing teaching strategy during a semester.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. A. Arkinsanya (1984). Development of a nursing knowledge base in the life sciences: problems and prospects. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 21(3), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7489(84)90043-9
  2. W. S. Seo(1995). An Analysis of Requisite Knowledge Body of Physioligy for Nursing Education. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, 2(2), 229-237.
  3. M. K. Cho, G. S. Shin & M. A. Choe(2013). A Study Nurses' Knowledge, Need and Clinical Performance about Pathophysiology. Journal of Korean biogical nursing science, 15(3), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2013.15.3.139
  4. M. Clarke (1995). Nursing and the biological sciences. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(3), 405-406. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22030405.x
  5. N. H. Kim, J. Y. Park & S. E. Jun(2015). The Effects of Case-Based Learning (CBL) on Learning Motivation and Learning Satisfaction of Nursing Students in a Human Physiology Course. Journal of Korean biogical nursing science, 17(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2015.17.1.78
  6. J. S. Yoo, J. A. Ahn, G. S. Yeo & S. H. Chu(2008). The Study to Reorganize the Course of Basic Nursing Science in a College of Nursing. Journal of Korean biogical nursing science, 10(2), 162-169.
  7. K. S. Lee et al (2013). Development of Standard Syllabuses for 4 Subjects (Structure and Function of Human Body, Pathogenic Microbiology, Pathophysiology, Mechanisms and Effects of Drug) of Bionursing. Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 15(1),33-42. http://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2013.15.1.33
  8. M. A. Choe & G. S. Shin(1997). A Study on the Current Status of the Curriculum Operation of the Basic Medical Sciences in Nursing Education. Journal of Korean academy of nursing, 27(4), 975-987.
  9. M. A. Choe (2012). Perspectives on Bionursing Science. Perspectives in nursing science, 9(2), 61-70.
  10. J. S. Jeong et al (2018). Current Status of Biological Nursing Science Education for Clinical Nurses in General Hospital. Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 20(1), 47-53. http://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2018.20.1.47
  11. U. Kyriacos, S. Jordan & J. Heever (2005). The biological sciences in nursing: A developing country perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(1), 91-103. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03555.x.
  12. C. A. Toledo (2006). "Does your dog bite?" Creating good questions for online discussion. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 150-154.
  13. K. W. Jang & H. J. Kim (2012). Teaching Competencies for Learner-Centered Education and Comparison of the Perception of Pre-service and In-service Teachers. Journal of Learner-Centerd Curriculum and Instruction, 12(2), 285-310.
  14. Lea, S. T., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students' attitudes to student centered learning: beyond 'educational bulimia'. Studies in Higher Education. 28(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309293
  15. J. H. Ryu, H.J. Joe & S. J. Yoon (2007). Exploratory Analysis of Learner Generating Questions. Journal of Education Research, 30, 109-129.
  16. S. S. Jeon & H. S. Go (2015). Classroom with Questions: Secondary Edition. [2], Seoul : Gyeonghyang BP
  17. J. Y. Kim & S. H. Lee (2019). The Effect of Lesson with Generated Questions Application in Clinical Practice Education for Nursing Students. Journal of Learner-Centerd Curriculum and Instruction, 19(6), http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.6.985
  18. J. Y. Park, C. H. Woo(2017). The Effects of Lesson with Student-Generated Questions: Based on Flipped Learning Utilizing Massive Open Online Courses. Journal of Learner-Centerd Curriculum and Instruction, 17(11), 283-306. http://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.11.283
  19. Y. M. Yhn, S. J. Hwang (2015). Lesson with Students Generated Questions: Based on a Department of Health Science. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 21(2), 266-275. http://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.2.266.
  20. Y. M. Yu, Y. M. Yang (2018). The effect of team-based learning, student generated questions, and lecture-based learning in physiology course. Journal of Learner-Centerd Curriculum and Instruction,, 18(9), 79-97. http://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.9.79.
  21. Y. D. Kang (2019). A Study on Development of Instructional Model for Smart Education Based on Game App. The Jornal of Humanties and Social Sciences21, 10(3), 1617-1627. http://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.10.3.117.
  22. R. Dellos (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49-52.
  23. J. S. Bae (2009). Development of data for after-school math classes in middle school and a study on the change in attitudes toward mathematical propensity after application. Master degree, Korea University.
  24. J. J. Woo, B. N. Kim & K. D. Bu (2012). A Study on the Verification of Influential Power over Learning Effect by the Learning Participation Activities: the LMS of the O Cyber University. Jornal of Korean Insititute of Information Technology, 10(4), 97-103.
  25. J. Kibble (2007). Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance. Advances in Physiology Education, 31(3), 253-260. http://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00027.2007.
  26. M. Peat, & S. Franklin (2002). Supporting student learning: the use of computer based formative assessment modules. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00288
  27. M. A. A. Ismail, & J. A. M. Mohammad (2017). Kahoot: A promising tool for formative assessment in medical education. Education in Medical Journal, 9(2), 19-26. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1658-z
  28. C. M. Plump & J. LaRosa (2017). Using Kahoot! in the classroom to create engagement and active learning: a game-based technology solution for elearning novices. Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298116689783
  29. H. S. Jun & H. J. Ju (2017). The Effect of Term Based Learning on Communication Ability, Problem Solving Ability and Self -Directed Learning in Nursing Science Education. Journal of digital convergence 15(10), 269-279. http://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.269
  30. J. George-Palilonis & V. Filak (2009). Blended learning in the visual communications classromm: Student reflections on a multimedia course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21(1), 82-96.
  31. C. R. Graham (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (3th ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 333-350). New York: Global.
  32. I. A. E. Spanjers et al (2015). The promised lan of blended learning: quizzes as a moderator. Educational Research Review, 15, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.05.001
  33. F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A. G. Lang & A. Buchner (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39(2), 175-91. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  34. J. M. Keller (1987) Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design," Journal of Instructional Development, .10(3), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
  35. S. k. Park (1998). The effects of the constructivist instructional model using ARCS strategies on the acquisition of scientific conceptions and learning motivation. Doctoral dissertation, Busan University, Busan.
  36. S. J. Lee, Y. K. Jang, H. N. Lee &G. Y. Park (2003). Study on the development of life-skills : communication, problem solving, and self-directed learning. Seoul : Korea Educational Development Institute.
  37. J. Yoon. (2004). Development of an Instrument for the Meawurement of Critical Thinking Disposition : In Nursing. Doctoral dissertation, Caholic University, Seoul.
  38. Y. L. Ji & H. M. Jong (2014). Effects of Case-Based Learning on Task Achievment and Learning Satisfaction in the Univerity Class. Journal of Learner-Centerd Curriculum and Instruction, 14(9), 243-265.
  39. IBM Corp. : IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. (2013)
  40. H. M. Son (2017). Understanding and Application of Qualitative Content Analysis. Journal of Korean Association for Qualitative Research, 2, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.48000/KAQRKR.2017.2.56
  41. Y. C. Kim (2012). Qualitative Research Methodology I.Seoul: Academypress
  42. M. K. Cho & M. Y. Kim (2017). Effects of Learner Motivation and Teacher-student Interaction on Learner Satisfaction in Nursing Students, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(4), 468-477. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.04.468.
  43. Y. M. Ryu & Seieun, Oh (2019). The effect of student-generated question partially pathology course on lesrning motivation, communication, and problem solving of nursing students. Journal of digital convergence 17(3), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.3
  44. B. Spence, (2019). The effects of intercative quizzing with Kahoot! on sudent learning and satisfaction: a pilot study. Radiologic Science & Education, 24(2), 21-28.
  45. J. T. Dillon (1986). Student question and individual learning. Education Theory, 36(4), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1986.00333.x
  46. S. R. Kim (2014). A Validation Study of Learners' Questioning Hesitation Factor Scale during College Lectures. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(3), 249-271.
  47. C. I. Hwang (2010). An Analysis Study on Students' Questioning Behaviors and Hinerance Factors in University Class. Doctoral dissertation, , Yonsei Unicversity, Seoul
  48. S. A. Licorish, H. E. Owen, B. Daniel & J. L. George (2018). Students' perception of Kahoot!'s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0068-x
  49. H. Kim (2016). A Case Study on the Design and Operation of Blended Learning in a Nursing Class. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 7(6), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.7.6.19
  50. S. H. Im(2019). The Effect of Adult Nursing Education on the Critical Thinking Disposition, Learing Commitment, and Learning Satisfation of Nursing Students Using the Havruta Learning. JKAIS. 20(7), 547-554. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.7.547
  51. C. J. Song (2014). A Study on the Teaching and Learning Activities, Student-teacher Communication, and Course Satisfaction. Asian Journal of Education, 15(2), 171-200. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2014.15.2.007