DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strategic Guidelines for The Intensification of Regional Development Under the Impact of Potential-Forming Determinants in the Conditions of Digitalization

  • Received : 2021.08.05
  • Published : 2021.08.30

Abstract

The key challenges and problematic aspects of the formation of intellectually and innovation-oriented strategies of regional entities at the present stage of their development are considered. The main tasks that arise in the process of strategizing the potential-forming development of regional economic systems in the context of digitalization are identified. The list of key organizational and economic directions of strategic character of providing intellectual and innovative development of regional economic systems is formed, which includes clustering of centers of high-tech development of regions, creation of creative hubs, development of knowledge infrastructure and improvement of interregional cooperation; a brief description of each of the presented strategic organizational and economic directions is given. Based on the analysis, the key strategic guidelines for the development of regional economic entities in the context of digitalization under the influence of potential-forming determinants, which form the content basis for further processes of strategizing qualitative aspects of development of specific regional entities.

Keywords

References

  1. Arefieva, O., Tulchynska, S., Popelo, O., Arefiev, S., Tkachenko, T. (2021). The Economic Security System in the Conditions of the Powers Transformation. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(7), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.7.4.
  2. Becerra, L., Carenzo, S., Juarez, P. (2020). When circular economy meets inclusive development. Insights from urban recycling and rural water access in Argentina. Sustainability, 12(23), 9809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239809.
  3. Bouckaert, G. (2019). Dissemination of scientific knowledge on reforming public administration: Some changing mechanisms. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 19(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.19.1.1.
  4. Butko, M., Ivanova, N., Popelo, O., Samiilenko, G. (2020). Conceptual foundations of the regional industrial cluster formation based on European experience and leading world tendencies. Financial and credit activity: Problems of theory and practice, 1(32), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i32.200528.
  5. Castellanos, J. M. B. (2019). Social responsibility in public administrations with special reference to the region of Valencia. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, 52.
  6. De Leon C. A. G. (2019). The role of public administration in promoting socio-economic development. Social Development and Societies in Transition (pp. 107-120). ImprintRoutledge.
  7. Tulchynska, S., Popelo, O., Dergaliuk, B., Khanin, S., Shevchuk, N. (2021). Strategic assessment of the ecological condition of the regions in the context of innovative development. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(Extra D), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-D1101p.315-322.
  8. Efremov, A. (2020). In reference to creating a mechanism for detecting systemic legal limitations of public administration digitalization. Public Administration, 4, 59-83.
  9. Halkos, G., Moll de A. J., Todorov, V. (2021). Economies' inclusive and green industrial performance: An evidence based proposed index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123516.
  10. Khanin, S., Arefieva, O., Dergaliuk, M., Popelo, O., Tulchynska, S. (2021). Concepts of the activation of intellectual and innovative determinants for the development intensification of regional economic systems introduction. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(Extra E), 234-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-E1180p.234-244.
  11. Khudolei, V., Bespalov, M., Tulchynska, S., Tulchinsky, R., Kholivko, N. (2021). Fiscal stimulation of spatial development: the eu contriems' cases. Financial and credit activities: problems of theory and practice, (1(36)), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i36.227676.
  12. Kraynyuk, L., Uhodnikova, O., Vlashchenk, N., Sokolenko, A., Viatkin, K. (2020). The mechanism of public administration of the travel industry development: Prospects for the ecotourism development. XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference "State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2020", 175, 10016. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017510016.
  13. Ljungholm, D. P. (2017). Global policy mechanisms intergovernmental power politics and democratic decision-making modes of transnational public administration. Geopolitics History and International Relations, 9(2), 199-205. doi:10.22381/GHIR92201710.
  14. Loginova, E., Loseva, N., Polkovnikov, A. (2020). Realization of population's motivational potential in the system of public administration as a factor of institutional ensuring the competitiveness of the Region. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 110, 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45913-0_32.
  15. Mukhametzhan, S., Junusbekova, G., Daueshov, M. (2020). The management of Urban development for the regional economic growth: The example of Kazakhstan. Economy of Region, 16(4), 1285-1301. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-19.
  16. Popelo, O. V. (2017). Methodological approaches to modernization processes of the productive forces in the conditions of Eurointegration. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 1(1(9)), 218-224. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-5129. https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2017-1-1(9)-218-224
  17. Revko, A., Butko, M., Popelo, O. (2020). Methodology for Assessing the Inflence of Cultural Infrastructure on Regional Development in Poland and Ukraine. Comparatie Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 23(2), 21-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.10.
  18. Reznichenko, S., Shishkin, V., Shichiyakh, R., Smolentsev, V. (2016). Theoretical and methodological foundations of the management by objectives for the regional socioeconomic systems development. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(6), 90-94. http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/2929/pdf.
  19. Sakharova, S., Avdeeva, I., Golovina, T., Parakhina, L. (2021). The public administration of the socio-economic development of the Arctic zone based on a stakeholder approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 678, 012035. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/678/1/012035.
  20. Salbaroli, E., Mazzini, G. (2018). OCP Deployment in a Public Administration Data Center: The Emilia-Romagna Region Use Case. IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom). DOI: 10.1109/BlackSeaCom.2018.8433637.
  21. Shkarlet, S., Ivanova, N., Popelo, O., Dubina, M., Zhuk, O. (2020). Infrastructural and Regional Development: Theoretical Aspects and Practical Issues. Studies of Applied Economics, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v38i4.4002.
  22. Skica, T., Dvoulety, O. (2018). Quantification of the size of local public administration: Empirical study of Polish regions. European Spatial Research and Policy, 25(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.25.1.05.
  23. Soboleva, Yu., Matveev, V., Ilyukhina, I., Efimenko, I., Simonov, S. (2019). Progressive advance in supply chain management of regional socio-economic development: Conceptual framework and evaluation mechanism. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 751-760. https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/3414/1828.
  24. Khanin, S., Tulchynska, S., Popelo, O., Derhaliuk, M., Ishchejkin, T. (2021). Systematization of functional features of intellectual and innovative determinants of the intensification of the regional economic development. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(2), 710-720. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-62202021721118p.710-720.
  25. Tulchynska, S., Vovk, O., Popelo, O., Saloid, S., Kostiunik, O. (2021). Innovation and investment strategies to intensify the potential modernization and to increase the competitiveness of microeconomic systems. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(6), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.6.22.
  26. Wu, D. (2018). Computer model deduction based on function mechanism of government micro-blog's participation in public administration. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, 21(2), 201811577.
  27. Xu. Y., Li, A. (2019). Regional economic development coordination management system based on fuzzy hierarchical statistical model. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(12), 8305-8315. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3953-8.
  28. Yin, X. (2018). Construction of management system for coordination degree of regional economic development based on the fusion of spatial econometric model. 10th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA) (art 17703620). DOI: 10.1109/ICMTMA.2018.00124.
  29. Yukhneva, N., Mokerova, O., Kukhtin, P. (2016). The regulatory role of the state strategic management in the development of the regional entrepreneurial sphere. MATEC Web of Conferences, 106, 08089. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710608089.
  30. Adam, M. (2018). Towards a unified approach to digitalization in Europe. Revista de Obras Publicas, 165(3597), 20-27.
  31. Afonasova, M.A., Panfilova, E.E., Galichkina, M.A., Slusarczyk, B. (2019). Digitalization in economy and innovation: The effect on social and economic processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.02.
  32. Alraja, M.N., Hussein, M.A., Ahmed, H.M.S. (2020). What affects digitalization process in developing economies? An evidence from the SMEs sector in Oman. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(1), 441-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/eei.v10i1.2033.
  33. Billestrup, J., & Stage, J. (2014). E-government and the digital agenda for Europe: a study of the user involvement in the digitalisation of citizen services in Denmark. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments: Third International Conference, DUXU 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014, Proceedings, Part II (PART 2 ed., pp. 71-80). Springer Publishing Company. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07626-3_7.
  34. Budzinski, O., Stohr, A. (2019). The competition policy reform in Europe and Germany - institutional change in the light of digitization. European Competition Journal, 15(1), 15-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2018.1555942
  35. Chudnovskiy, A.D., Tsabolova, O.R., Zhukova, M.A. (2021). Using the Digitalization Experience of Small Enterprises of the Tourism and Hospitality Sector in Germany for Development of the Tourism Infrastructure in Russia. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 314, 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56433-9_39.
  36. Cosmulese, C.G., Grosu, V., Hlaciuc, E., & Zhavoronok, A. (2019). The Influences of the Digital Revolution on the Educational System of the EU Countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 242-254. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-18
  37. Dannikov, O. V., Sichkarenko, K. O. (2018). Conceptual principles of the economy digitalization in Ukraine. Economics and management of the national economy, 17, 73-79.
  38. De Silva, I. (2019). Tackling the challenges raised by the economy digitalization: Recent experiences of the French competition authority. Antitrust Bulletin, 64(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003603X18822577. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003603X18822577
  39. Kholiavko, N., Djakona, A., Dubyna, M., Zhavoronok, A., & Lavrov, R. (2020). The higher education adaptability to the digital economy. Bulletin of the National Academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4(386), 294-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1467.130
  40. Shkarlet, S. M., Dubyna, M. V. (2017). Essence and features of information society development. Scientific bulletin of Polissia, 1(2(10)), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2017-1-3(11)-152-158
  41. Eichstadt, S. (2020). Metrology for the digitalization of economy and society. In 19th ITG/GMA-Symposium on Sensors and Measuring Systems 2018 "Sensoren und Messsysteme - Beitrage der 19. ITG/GMA-Fachtagung" (pp. 340-343).
  42. Gopane, T.J. (2020). Digitalisation, Productivity, and Measurability of Digital Economy: Evidence from BRICS. In 5th International Conference on Digital Economy, ICDEc 2020 "Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing", 395, 27-37. https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository?view=null&f0=sm_identifier%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fhdl.handle.net%2F10210%2F458882%22&sort=ss_dateNormalized%5C.
  43. Heath Nick. (February 19, 2019). How Estonia became an e-government powerhouse. https://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/Documents/educ/International_Ed_Study_Group_2020/Estonia/12.Article_%20HowEstoniabecameane-governmentpowerhouse.pdf.
  44. Popelo O., Dubyna M., Kholiavko N. (2021) World Experience In The Introduction Of Modern Innovation And Information Technologies In The Functioning Of Financial Institutions. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(2), 188-199. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-2-188-199.
  45. Kljucnikov, A., Civelek, M., Krajcik, V., Ondrejmiskova, I. (2020). Innovative regional development of the structurally disadvantaged industrial region by means of the local currency. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 25(2), 224-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v25i2.9.
  46. Klymenko, E.Y., Alpeissova, S.E. (2021). The Experience of Ukraine and Kazakhstan of the Education Digitization Under Quarantine Conditions. Proceeding from Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1352, 161-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_15.
  47. Kornieieva, Yu. V. (2018). The role of the state in promoting investment in digital economy. Economics of forecasting, 1, 120-134. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.120.
  48. Popelo, O., Kychko, I., Tulchynska, S., Zhygalkevych, Zh., Treitiak, O. (2021). The Impact of Digitalization on the Forms Change of Employment and the Labor Market in the Context of the Information Economy Development. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(5), 160-167. DOI: 10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.5.23
  49. Lazarenko, I., Saloid, S., Tulchynska, S., Kyrychenko, S., Tulchinskiy, R. (2020). Necessity of implementating data science course in economics curricula. Information technologies and teaching aids, 4(78), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v78i4.3505.
  50. Lin Chia Jie (July, 2018). Denmark leads the world in digital government. https://govinsider.asia/innovation/denmark-online-servicesdigital-government-australia-korea/.
  51. Samiilenko, H., Popelo, O., Khudolei, V., Mashnenkov, K., Derkachenko, Yu. (2021). Transformational processes of clustering in digital economy. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(Extra C), 691-702. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217ExtraC1106p.691-702
  52. Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856.
  53. Samoilovych, A., Garafonova, O., Popelo, O., Marhasova, V., & Lazarenko, Yu. (2021). World experience and ukrainian realities of digital transformation of regions in the context of the information economy development. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, (3(38)), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v3i38.237462.
  54. Shkarlet, S., Kholiavko, N., Dubyna, M. (2019). Information Economy: Management of Educational, Innovation, and Research Determinants. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 126-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-10.
  55. Sudolska, A., Lapinska, J. (2020). Exploring determinants of innovation capability in manufacturing companies operating in Poland. Sustainability, 12(17), 7101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177101.
  56. Szopik-Depczynska, K., Cheba, K., WiSniewska, J. (2020). Innovation, R&D and user-driven innovation activity in R&D Departments in Poland. The multi-criteria analysis. In International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, KES 2020, 176, 2705-2713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.290.
  57. Xu, Y., Li, A. (2020). The relationship between innovative human capital and interprovincial economic growth based on panel data model and spatial econometrics. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112381.
  58. Zajkowska, M. (2017). Open models of innovation processes as a future management challenge for small and medium-sized enterprises in Poland. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 25(4), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.214.