정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제25권4호
  • /
  • Pages.603-610
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

엔트리 파이썬을 활용한 프로그래밍 학습이 초등학생의 논리적 사고력에 미치는 영향

The effects of Programming Learning Using Entry Python on Elementary School Students' Logical Thinking Ability

  • 투고 : 2021.05.31
  • 심사 : 2021.07.03
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 SW교육 방법의 일환으로 초등학교 모든 실과교과서에서 엔트리 사이트를 활용하고 있다. 하지만 모두 블록형 프로그래밍 언어를 학습하고 있어 일상생활에서 활용할 수 있는 프로그램을 제작하는데 어려움이 있다. 본 연구는 엔트리 파이썬으로 프로그래밍을 학습하는 것이 초등학생의 논리적 사고력과 프로그래밍 흥미도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구이다. 총 8차시의 수업 전과 후 논리적 사고력 검사와 프로그래밍 흥미도 검사를 진행하였다. 수업 전, 후 논리적 사고력 점수가 평균 6.6점에서 9.4점으로 상승하였으며 프로그래밍 흥미도 또한 평균 46.7점에서 59.1점으로 상승하였다. 이를 통해 엔트리 파이썬을 활용한 프로그래밍 학습이 초등학생의 논리적 사고력 및 프로그래밍 흥미도 증진에 유의미하다는 결과를 얻었다.

As part of recent SW education methods, entry sites have been used in all practical textbooks in elementary schools. However, they are all learning block-type programming languages, making it difficult to produce programs that can be used in everyday life. This study is a study on the effects of learning programming using entry python on logical thinking ability and programming interest in elementary school students. Logical thinking ability and programming interest tests were conducted before and after the 8th class. Before and after classes, logical thinking ability score rose from an average of 6.6 to 9.4 and programming interests score also rose from an average of 46.7 to 59.1. This results in programming learning using Entry Python is significant for enhancing the logical thinking ability and programming interest of elementary school students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bongseok Jang, Sohee Yoon(2020). The Meta-Analysis on Effects of Education of Python for Elementary School Students. Journal of The Korean Society of Industry Convergence, 18(5), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.22678/JIC.2020.18.5.097
  2. Dongman Kim, Taewuk Lee(2017). Enhancement Method of the Procedural Thinking Ability through Universal Programming Language Utilizing Entry. The Korean Association Of Computer Education, 21(2), 131-134.
  3. Gunbatar, M. S., & Turan, B. (2019). The Effect of Block-Based Programming on the Computational Thinking Skills of Middle School Students. Online Submission, 2, 335-339.
  4. Hangseop Choi(2018). Analysis of the characteristics of social change in the era of the 4th industrial revolution for future education prospects. KEDI Research Report, 1-77.
  5. Heeok Heo, Jeonghee Seo(2018). Future Directions of Korean Teacher Education in SW Education Through the Review of International Cases. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 711-743. https://doi.org/10.17232/kset.34.3.711
  6. Hyunbae Kim(2019). Comparisons of Information Education Curriculum and Contents of Local Textbooks at Elementary Schools in Korea and China. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 23(3), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.3.237
  7. Inhelder, B., Piaget, J.(1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures (Vol. 22). Psychology Press.
  8. Inhwan Yoo(2018). The Design of SW Education for Elementary School Using Python and Robots. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 9(1), 149-155.
  9. Jaeeun Kwon(2004). Development and Application of the Teaching Method for Programming Language Education. Master dissertation, Major in Computer Education, Graduate School of Education Andong National University.
  10. Jeongah Kim, Minkyu Kim, Youngmin Kim, Hyejin Ryu, Jonghun Kim(2019). Effect of data visualization education with using Python on dcomputational thinking of six grade in elementary. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 23(3), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.3.197
  11. Kyusung Jung(1998). Proposal to Modify GALT for Measuring the Degree of Formation of Positional Thinking Ability of Elementary School Learners. Master dissertation, Major in Elementary School Science Education, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education Chungbuk.
  12. McClelland, D. C.(1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American psychologist, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092
  13. Ministry of Education(2015). 2015 Revised Curriculum General Commentary.
  14. Ministry of Education(2015). 2015 Revised Practical Course/Information Science Curriculum.
  15. Mirabile, R. J.(1997). Everything you wanted to know about competency modeling. Training & development, 51(8), 73-78.
  16. Miye Moon, Kapsu Kim(2018). Python programming education for elementary school students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 9(1), 33-41.
  17. Prahalad, C. K., Hamel, G.(1997). The core competence of the corporation. In strategic business planning/strategic business management, 969-987.
  18. Rychen, D. S. E., & Salganik, L. H. E. (2001). Defining and selecting key competencies. hogrefe & huber publishers.
  19. Saez-Lopez, J. M., del Olmo-Munoz, J., Gonzalez-Calero, J. A., & Cozar-Gutierrez, R. (2020). Exploring the Effect of Training in Visual Block Programming for Preservice Teachers. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030065
  20. Saritepeci, M., & Durak, H. (2017). Analyzing the effect of block and robotic coding activities on computational thinking in programming education. Educational research and practice, 490-501.
  21. Uisung Song, Hwakyung Rim(2021). The Necessity of an Elementary School Information Curriculum based on the Analysis of Overseas SW and AI Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 25(2), 301-308. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.2.301