In Search of Corporate Growth and Scale-up in the Entrepreneurial Context: What Affects the Growth of Enterprise Value, the Pace of Growth, and the Effectiveness of Growth.

기업가적 컨텍스트에서 기업 성장과 스케일업 연구: 기업가치의 성장, 성장의 속도, 성장의 효과성에 영향을 미치는 요인

  • Lee, Young-Dal (DGIST, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology) ;
  • Oh, Soyoung (Baruch College of the City University of New York)
  • 이영달 (대구경북과학기술원) ;
  • 오소영 (뉴욕시립대학교 버룩칼리지)
  • Received : 2021.05.10
  • Accepted : 2021.08.24
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

This study investigated the corporate growth with more emphasis on longitudinal characteristics, not the results of companies with relatively more emphasis on cross-sectional, in the 21st-century entrepreneurial context. As of the end of 2019, sampled 479 global unicorn companies, and 333 high-growth companies with revenue of more than $100 million among 5,000 private companies in the U.S. with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 15% for the past three years. They were examined with 3 perspectives in terms of corporate growth that 1) the growth of enterprise value, 2) the pace of growth, and 3) the effectiveness of growth. As a result of our study, the corporate growth of the perspective of creating enterprise value had a relatively higher relationship with the characteristics of industries and markets. The pace of growth was more fully explained by the characteristics of the industry and the market environment and the choice of strategies that make up a valid combination. In addition, growth in terms of the effectiveness of corporate performance was influenced by the choice of strategy, the characteristics of the industry and market environment, and its business age, the proxy variable of resource accumulation, comprehensively. This study through a sample based on companies with an enterprise value of more than $1 billion and annual revenue of more than $100 million can be a valid reference in terms of creating milestones and roadmaps for scale-up of early-stage startups, particularly in terms of practitioners' point of view. It also provides a critical reference for overcoming the limitations of mainstream theories of the 20th century and developing the theory of corporate growth that fits the 21st-century entrepreneurial context.

본 연구는 주로 횡단적 측정에 의해 설명되는 기업의 성과와 달리, 종단적 측정과 성격이 더 강조되는 기업의 성장을 '스타트업 및 스케일업 생태계'로 대변되는 21세기 기업가적 컨텍스트에서 살펴보았다. 2019년 기준 글로벌 유니콘 기업 479개, 최근 3년간 연평균복합성장률(CAGR)이 15%를 초과하는 미국의 5천 개 비상장 기업 중 매출액 1억달러 이상인 333개의 고성장 기업을 대상으로, 이들 기업의 고성장을, 1)기업가치의 성장, 2)성장의 속도, 3)성장의 효과성 관점에서 전략의 선택, 산업 및 시장환경, 그리고 업력(자원축적의 대위 변수)과의 상호관계를 살펴보았다. 연구 결과, 기업가치의 성장은 상대적으로 산업 및 시장 특성과 영향 관계가 더 높았다. 성장의 속도는 산업 및 시장환경의 특성과 유효 조합을 이루는 전략의 선택에 따라 더 충실히 설명되었다. 그리고 기업 성장의 효과성은 전략의 선택, 산업 및 시장환경의 특성, 그리고 업력(자원축적의 대위 변수) 모두로부터 영향을 받는 특성을 지니고 있었다. 기업가치 10억 달러 이상, 연간 매출액 1억 달러 이상의 조건을 가진 주식회사 기반의 샘플을 통한 본 연구는, 특히 실무적인 관점에서 초기 스타트업이 향후 스케일업을 위한 일련의 방향을 모색 과정에 유효한 참고가 될 수 있을 것이다. 특히 기업가치, 성장 속도, 성장의 효과성 관점에서 개별 기업이 추구하는 방향성과 정합성을 이루는 성장 동인과 요인을 조합하는데 실효적 참고를 제공하고 있다. 또한 20세기 주류 이론들이 지닌 한계점을 극복하고, 21세기 기업가적 컨텍스트에 부합하는 기업 성장 이론을 개발하는 데 그 기초 참고를 제공하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Achtenhagen, L., Naldi, L., & Melin, L.(2010). "Business Growth"-Do Practitioners and Scholars Really Talk About the Same Thing? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 289-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00376.x
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Mueller, P.(2008). Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, Gazelles and Elephants. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9052-3
  3. Almus, M., & Nerlinger, E. A.(1999). Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter? Small business economics, 13(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008138709724
  4. Barczak, G.(1995). New Product Strategy, Structure, Process, and Performance in the Telecommunications Industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(3), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1230224
  5. Barney, J.(1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  6. Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F., & Neubaum, D. O.(2005). A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 663-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.03.004
  7. Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A.(2004). The Relationship of Entrepreneurial Traits, Skill, and Motivation to Subsequent Venture Growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587
  8. Birch, D. L.(1981). Who creates jobs? The Public Interest, 65, 3-14.
  9. Birch, D. L., & Medoff, J.(1994). Gazelles. In L. C. Solmon & A. R. Levenson (Eds.), Labor markets, employment policy and job creation. Boulder, CO: Westview
  10. Bos, J. W. B., & Stam, E.(2014). Gazelles and industry growth: A study of young high-growth firms in The Netherlands. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt050
  11. Canals, J.(2001), How to think about Corporate Growth, European Management Journal, 19(6), 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00084-6
  12. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A. & Sanders, W. G.(2016). "Upper EchelonsResearch Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top ManagementTeam Composition". Journal of Management. 30(6), 749-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
  13. Cassia, L., Cogliati, G. M., & Paleari, S.(2009). Hyper-Growth Among European SMEs: An Explorative Study. SSRN Electronic Journal, 38.
  14. Cardon, M. S., Foo, M., Shepherd, D., & Wiklund, J.(2012). Exploring the Heart: Entrepreneurial Emotion is a Hot Topic. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00501.x
  15. Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., Dell'Era, C., & Pellizzoni, E.(2019), Fostering digital entrepreneurship from startup to scaleup: The role of venture capital funds and angel groups, Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 145, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.022
  16. Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S. O., Holzl, W., Johansson, D., & Nightingale, P.(2014). High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt052
  17. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B.(2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-0
  18. Eshima, Y. & Anderson, B. S.(2017), From Growth, Adapative Capability, and Entrepreneurial Orientation, Strategic Management Journal, 38, 770-779 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2532
  19. Freel, M. S., & Robson, P. J. A.(2004). Small Firm Innovation, Growth and Performance: Evidence from Scotland and Northern England. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 22(6), 561-575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604047410
  20. Greve, H. R.(2008). A Behavioral Theory of Firm Growth: Sequential Attention to Size and Performance Goals. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625975
  21. Halabisky, D., Dreessen, E., & Parsley, C.(2006). Growth in Firms in Canada, 1985-1999. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 19(3), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2006.10593370
  22. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A.(1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. The Academy of Management Review. 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277628
  23. Harms, R.(2009). A Multivariate Analysis of the Characteristics of Rapid Growth Firms, Their Leaders, and Their Market. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 22(4), 429-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2009.10593464
  24. Hellmann, T. & Kavadias, S.(2016). Scale-up UK: Growing Businesses, Growing our Economy, UK, Convened by Barclays. Cambridge Judge Business School and Oxford Said Business School.
  25. Henderson, A. D., Raynor, M. E., & Ahmed, M.(2012). How long must a firm be great to rule out chance? Benchmarking sustained superior performance without being fooled by randomness. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1943
  26. Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D.(2010). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z
  27. Holzl, W., & Friesenbichler, K.(2010). High-growth firms, innovation and the distance to the frontier. Economics Bulletin, 30(2), 1016-1024.
  28. Isenberg, D., & Onyemah, V.(2016). Fostering Scaleup Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth (Innovations Case Narrative: Manizales-Mas and Scale Up Milwaukee). Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 11(1-2), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00248
  29. Janssen, F.(2009). Does the Environment Influence the Employment Growth of SMEs? Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 22(3), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2009.10593458
  30. Joseph, J. & Wilson, A. J.(2018), The growth of the firm: An attention-based view, Strategic Management Journal. 39(6), 1779-1800. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2715
  31. Kirchhoff, B. A.(1993). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism: The Economics of Business Firm Formation and Growth. Westport: Praeger.
  32. Krasniqi, B. A., & Desai, S.(2016). Institutional drivers of high-growth firms: Country-level evidence from 26 transition economies. Small Business Economics, 47(4), 1075-1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9736-7
  33. Lee, N.(2014). What holds back high-growth firms? Evidence from UK SMEs. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9525-5
  34. Lee, Y. D., Kwon, H. W., Kim, D. H., Choi, S. J., & Ha, G. S.(2017). A Comparative Study on the Institutional Issues of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem among USA, Japan, China, and Korea. In Proceedings of The Korea Society of Business Venturing Academic Conference. The Korea Society of Business Venturing 2017 Spring Academic Conference, Seoul: The Korea Society of Business Venturing
  35. Lee, Y. D. & Oh, S. Y.(2021). An Exploratory Study on the Industry/Market Characteristics of the 'Hyper-Growing Companies' and the Firm Strategies: A focus on firms with more than annual revenue of 100 million dollars from 'Inc. the 5,000 Fastest-Growing Private Companies in America.' Asia Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 51-78. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.16.2.202104.51
  36. Lee, Y. D., Oh, S., & Yoon, Y. N.(2020). An Exploratory Study on the Characteristics of the 'Global Unicorn Club' and the Factors Influencing its Valuation: Focusing on the 'Unicorn Club' in 2019. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(6), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.15.1.202002.1
  37. Naylor, J. & Lewis, M.(1997). Internal alliances: Using joint ventures in a diversified company. Long Range Planning, 30(5), 678-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00051-4
  38. Littunen, H., & Tohmo, T.(2003). The high growth in new metal-based manufacturing and business service firms in Finland. Small Business Economics, 21(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025014427294
  39. Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P. & Girma, S.(2011). Organic and Acquisitive Growth: Re-examining, Testing and Extending Penrose's Growth Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00879.x
  40. Markman, G. D., & Gartner, W. B.(2002). Is Extraordinary Growth Profitable? A Study of Inc. 500 High-Growth Companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.271004
  41. Martin, R. L.(2015). Strategy Is About Both Resources and Positioning, Harvard Business Review, 27(4)
  42. Mason, G., Bishop, K., & Robinson, C.(2009). Business Growth and Innovation(BGI/36). London: NESTA.
  43. Mohr, V., Garnsey, E., & Theyel, G.(2014). The role of alliances in the early development of high-growth firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt056
  44. Moreno, F., & Coad, A.(2015). High-Growth Firms: Stylized Facts and Conflicting Results. SPRU Working Paper Series, 17, 187-230.
  45. Motoyama, Y.(2014). The state-level geographic analysis of high-growth companies. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 27(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2015.1012795
  46. OECD.(2003). Entrepreneurship and local economic development: programme and policy recommendations, Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  47. OECD.(2018). Strengthening SMEs and Entrepreneurship for Productivity and Inclusive Growth, Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  48. Penrose, E. T.(1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York, John Wiley.
  49. Pe'er, A., Vertinsky, I., & Keil, T.(2016). Growth and survival: The moderating effects of local agglomeration and local market structure: Growth and Survival. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 541-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2331
  50. Porter, M. E.(1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York. Free Press
  51. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A.(2011). Is innovation always beneficial? Ameta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
  52. Rothaermel, F.(2012). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. London: McGraw Hill Higher Education
  53. Smallbone, D., Leig, R., & North, D.(1995). The characteristics and strategies of high growth SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 1(3), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552559510100657
  54. Storey, D. J., & Wynarczyk, P.(1996). The survival and non survival of micro firms in the UK. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157668
  55. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A.(1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  56. Wasserman, N.(2008). Revisiting the Strategy, Structure, and Performance Paradigm: The Case of Venture Capital. Organization Science, 19(2), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0309