DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of some local dental hygiene and students' self-determination on class participation: Focusing on the mediating effect of educators' feedback types

일부 지역 치위생(학)과 학생들의 자기결정성이 수업참여에 미치는 영향: 교육자의 피드백 유형의 매개효과를 중심으로

  • Received : 2021.07.13
  • Accepted : 2021.08.08
  • Published : 2021.08.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to understand the effect of learners' self-determination on class participation, focusing on the feedback type of educators. Methods: A survey was conducted from May 1 to May 31 2021 on dental hygiene students, and a total of 151 valid responses were analyzed. The questionnaire consisted of general characteristics, self-determination, class participation, and educator's feedback type. The analysis method used correlation analysis and hierarchical regression analysis. Results: In relation to self-determination, class participation, and feedback type of educators, self-determination was positive feedback (r=0.338, p<0.01), class participation was corrective feedback (r=0.418, p<0.01), and positive feedback was correction (r=0.742, p<0.01). As a result of the mediating effect of the educator's feedback type in the relationship between self-determination and class participation, it was found to be significant by partially mediating positive and corrective feedback. Conclusions: It was found that the right to self-determination influences class participation based on positive feedback and corrective feedback of educators. It relates to efforts to strengthen learners' self-determination and provide appropriate types of feedback from educators.

Keywords

References

  1. Song CJ. The effect of peer-tutoring program based on the self-determination motivation to learn. JLCCI 2017;17(1):93-120. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.1.93
  2. Kim SS, Kim IS, Yang SK, Kim YI, Oh JS, Yang SK, et al. Oral health education. 4th ed. Seoul: Komoonsa; 2018:1-7.
  3. Kim BJ. A study of effects of keller's ARCS motivational model on learning motivation academic achievement in business major english class. J Digit Converg 2020;18(2):213-21. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.2.213
  4. Han SM. The relationships between the academic motivation variables, cognitive strategies and academic achievement. KJEP 2004;18(1):329-50.
  5. Daniel JB.Of carrots andsticks: a reviewofdeci andryan's intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 1990;54(3):323-32. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1990.54-323
  6. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Handbook of self-determination research roschester. 1st. New York: University of Rochester Plenum Press; 2002: 3-33.
  7. Sheldon KM, Elliot AJ, Kim YM, Kasser T. What is satisfying about satisfying events?:testing10 candidate psychological needs. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;89:325-39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325
  8. Vallerand RJ, Reid G. On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsicmotivation: a test of cognitive evaluation theory. J Sport Psychol 1984;6(1):94-102. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.6.1.94
  9. Cho HC, Seo JP. Relationship learning motivation and learning attitude of middle school students according the type of feedback. Korean Journal of Sports Science 2021;30(1):689-701. https://doi.org/10.35159/kjss.2021.2.30.1.689
  10. Lee N. A study on the management of liberal arts courses at universities using online classes and online feedback in the covid-19 era. Korean Journal of General Education 2021;15(1):259-72. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2021.15.1.259
  11. Choi JH. Teacher-student interaction analysis of elementary physical education classes. The Korean Society of Elementary Physical Education 1999;5(1):59-68.
  12. Kim EJ. Effects of self-determination on college freshman's life satisfaction. KJEP 2007;21(3):539-55.
  13. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 2000;55(1):68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  14. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?. Journal of Personality 2006;74(6):1557-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
  15. Cha MJ, Kim CM, Kwon HJ, Cho HD, Lee JY, Jeong SJ, et al. A development of learner participation scale in instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies 2010;22(1):195-219. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2010.22.1.195
  16. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51(6):1173-82. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
  17. Chung JS, Lee JH. Path analysis among perceived autonomy support, self-determination motivation and academic performance in a cyber university. KAEIM 2012;18(3):365-87.
  18. Matsumura LC, Patthey-Chavez GG, Valdes R, Garnier H. Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students' revision in lower-and higher-achieving urban schools. Elem Sch J 2002;103(1):3-25. https://doi.org/10.1086/499713
  19. Lim JY, Jung KS. The effects of self-determination learning motivation on learning outcomes: focused on the mediating effect of resilience. Korea Youth Research Association 2020;27(5):355-78. https://doi.org/10.21509/KJYS.2020.05.27.5.355
  20. Yun SJ, Lee JH, Choi HS. Perceived feedback type of instructors and intrinsic motivation influences the performance confidence of college level dance majoring students. KPEAW 2016;30(3):269-84.
  21. Jung BS. Effects of military instructors' feedback on military cadets' performance of military science courses. KJMAS 2016;72(3):53-76. https://doi.org/10.31066/kjmas.2016.72.3.003
  22. Hwang HJ. Effects of focus-on-form instruction and corrective feedback using flipped learning on learners' accuracy in english language use. JLS 2018;25(3):249-72. https://doi.org/10.14384/kals.2018.25.3.249