DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of co-variance components, genetic parameters, and genetic trends of reproductive traits in community-based breeding program of Bonga sheep in Ethiopia

  • Areb, Ebadu (Bonga Agricultural Research Centre) ;
  • Getachew, Tesfaye (International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Area) ;
  • Kirmani, MA (Animal Breeding, Jimma University, PC Depot) ;
  • G.silase, Tegbaru (Bonga Agricultural Research Centre) ;
  • Haile, Aynalem (International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Area)
  • Received : 2020.06.09
  • Accepted : 2020.11.08
  • Published : 2021.09.01

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of the study were to evaluate reproductive performance and selection response through genetic trend of community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) of Bonga sheep. Methods: Reproduction traits data were collected between 2012 and 2018 from Bonga sheep CBBPs. Phenotypic performance was analyzed using the general linear model procedures of Statistical Analysis System. Genetic parameters were estimated by univariate animal model for age at first lambing (AFL) and repeatability models for lambing interval (LI), litter size (LS), and annual reproductive rate (ARR) traits using restricted maximum likelihood method of WOMBAT. For correlations bivariate animal model was used. Best model was chosen based on likelihood ratio test. The genetic trends were estimated by the weighted regression of the average breeding value of the animals on the year of birth/lambing. Results: The overall least squares mean±standard error of AFL, LI, LS, and ARR were 375±12.5, 284±9.9, 1.45±0.010, and 2.31±0.050, respectively. Direct heritability estimates for AFL, LI, LS, and ARR were 0.07±0.190, 0.06±0.120, 0.18±0.070, and 0.25±0.203, respectively. The low heritability for both AFL and LI showed that these traits respond little to selection programs but rather highly depend on animal management options. The annual genetic gains were -0.0281 days, -0.016 days, -0.0002 lambs and 0.0003 lambs for AFL, LI, LS, and ARR, respectively. Conclusion: Implications of the result to future improvement programs were improving management of animals, conservation of prolific flocks and out scaling the CBBP to get better results.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was financed by Southern Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) and the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) through Coordinate Research Project Livestock.

References

  1. Gizaw S, Van Arendonk JAM, Komen H, Windig JJ, Hanotte O. Population structure, genetic variation and morphological diversity in indigenous sheep of Ethiopia. Anim Genet 2007; 38:621-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01659.x
  2. Berhanu B, Aynalem H. Reproductive performance of traditionally managed sheep in the south western part of Ethiopia. Livest Res Rural Dev 2009;21:154.
  3. Berhan A, Van Arendonk J. Reproductive performance and mortality rate in Menz and Horro sheep following controlled breeding in Ethiopia. Small Rumin Res 2006;63:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.03.003
  4. Gemeda D. Participatory definition of breeding objectives and implementation of community based sheep breeding programs in Ethiopia. Vienna, Austria: University of Natural Resource and Life Science; 2010.
  5. Getachew T, Haile A, Wurzinger M, et al. Review of sheep crossbreeding based on exotic sires and among indigenous breeds in the tropics : an Ethiopian perspective. Afr J Agric Res 2016;11:901-11. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.10626
  6. Haile A, Gizaw S, Getachew T, et al. Community-based breeding programmes are a viable solution for Ethiopian small ruminant genetic improvement but require public and private investments. J Anim Breed Genet 2019;136:319-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12401
  7. Getachew T, Haile A, Rischkowsky B. How to tailor community based breeding programs for small ruminants to pastoral production systems. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 2018.
  8. Wilson RT, Peacock CP, Sayers AR. Pre-weaning mortality and productivity indices for goats and sheep on a Masai group ranch in south-central Kenya. Anim Sci 1985;41:201-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100027860
  9. Mirkena T, Duguma G, Willam A, et al. Community-based alternative breeding plans for indigenous sheep breeds in four agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. J Anim Breed Genet 2012; 129:244-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00970.x
  10. Solomon A, Duguma G. Genetic and phenotypic parameters of growth, reproductive and survival performance of Horro sheep at Bako Agricultural Research Center. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Livestock Research Institute; 2000.
  11. Lamuno D, Solkner J, Meszaros G, et al. Evaluation frame-work of community-based livestock breeding programs. Livest Res Rural Dev 2018;30:47.
  12. SAS Institute Inc. SAS® 9.3 Intelligence platform: system administration guide. 2nd ed. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 2012.
  13. Meyer K. Wombat: a program for mixed model analyses by restricted maximum likelihood. 2012.
  14. El Fadili M, Michaux C, Detilleux J, Leroy PL. Genetic parameters for growth traits of the Moroccan Timahdit breed of sheep. Small Rumin Res 2000;37:203-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00126-7
  15. Willham RC. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding: III. Biometrical aspects of maternal effects in animals. J Anim Sci 1972;35:1288-93. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1972.3561288x
  16. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. London, UK: Pearson; 1996.
  17. Kariuki CM, Ilatsia ED, Kosgey IS, Kahi AK. Direct and maternal (co)variance components, genetic parameters and annual trends for growth traits of Dorper sheep in semi-arid Kenya. Trop Anim Health Prod 2010;42:473-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9446-0
  18. Amarilho-Silveira F, Dionello NJL, de Mendonca G, Motta JF, Fernandes TA, da Silveira Silva N. Genetic components of birth weight of texel sheep reared in extensive system. Acta Sci Anim Sci 2018;40:e36481. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v40i1.36481
  19. Mokhtari MS, Rashidi A, Esmailizadeh AK. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters for reproductive traits in Kermani sheep. Small Rumin Res 2010;88:27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.11.004
  20. Wilson AJ, Reale D, Clements MN, et al. An ecologist's guide to the animal model. J Anim Ecol 2010;79:13-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01639.x
  21. Edea Z, Haile A, Tibbo M, Sharma AK, Solkner J, Wurzinger M. Sheep production systems and breeding practices of small-holders in western and south-western Ethiopia: implications for designing community-based breeding strategies. Livest Res Rural Dev 2012;24:117.
  22. Ayele S, Urge M. Productive and reproductive performances of indigenous sheep in Ethiopia: a review. Open J Anim Sci 2019;9:97-120. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2019.91009
  23. Berry DP, Lonergan P, Butler ST, et al. Negative influence of high maternal milk production before and after conception on offspring survival and milk production in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2008;91:329-37. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0438
  24. Oliveira Lobo AMB, Braga Lobo RN, Paiva SR, de Oliveira SMP, Faco O. Genetic parameters for growth, reproductive and maternal traits in a multibreed meat sheep population. Genet Mol Biol 2009;32:761-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572009005000080
  25. Abegaz S, Duguma G, Negussie E, Gelmesa U, Terefe F, Rege JEO. Factors affecting reproductive performance and estimates of genetic parameters of litter size in Horro sheep. J Agric Sci 2002;139:79-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859602002265
  26. Saghi DA, Shahdadi AR. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for reproductive traits in Iranian native Kordi sheep. Acta Sci Anim Sci 2017;39:323-8. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v39i3.35378
  27. Aguirre EL, Mattos EC, Eler JP, Barreto Neto AD, Ferraz JB. Genetic parameters and genetic trends for reproductive traits of Santa Ines sheep kept in extensive environments in Brazil. J Anim Sci Livest Prod 2017;1:9. https://doi.org/10.21767/2577-0594.100009
  28. Abdoli R, Mirhoseini SZ, Hossein-Zadeh NG, et al. Genomewide association study of first lambing age and lambing interval in sheep. Small Rumin Res 2019;178:43-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.07.014
  29. Drouilhet L, Mansanet C, Sarry J, et al. The highly prolific phenotype of Lacaune sheep is associated with an ectopic expression of the B4GALNT2 gene within the ovary. PLoS Genet 2013;9:e1003809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003809
  30. Canche JET, Monforte JGM, Correa JCS. Environmental effects on productive and reproductive performance of Pelibuey ewes in Southeastern Mexico. J Appl Anim Res 2016;44:508-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1102730
  31. Bayeriyar M, Farahani AHK, Shahrbabak HM. Estimation of genetic parameters for economic important traits in Moghani Iranian sheep. Afr J Biotechnol 2011;10:14678-83. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.1386
  32. Negussie E, Abegaz S, Rege JEO. Genetic trend and effects of inbreeding on growth performance of tropical fat-tailed sheep. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 2002 Aug 19-23: Montpellier, France.