DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of seismic responses of reactor vessel and internals for beyond-design basis earthquake using elasto-plastic time history analysis

  • Lee, Sang-Jeong (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Eun-ho (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Changkyun (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, No-Cheol (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Youngin (Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety) ;
  • Oh, Changsik (Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety)
  • Received : 2020.04.28
  • Accepted : 2020.08.11
  • Published : 2021.03.25

Abstract

Existing elastic analysis methods cannot be adhered to in order to assess the structural integrity of a reactor vessel and internals for a beyond design basis earthquake. Elasto-plastic analysis methods are required, and the factors that affect the elasto-plastic behavior of reactor materials should be taken into account. In this study, a material behavior model was developed that considers the irradiation embrittlement effect, which affects the elasto-plastic behavior of the reactor material. This was used to perform the elasto-plastic time history analyses of the reactor vessel and its internals for beyond design basis earthquake. For this investigation, appropriate beyond design basis earthquakes and reliable finite element models were used. Based on the analysis results, consideration was given to the load reduction effect and the margin change. These were transferred to the internals due to the plastic deformation of the reactor vessel.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No.20194030202460). Also, this work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2019M2D2A2048296)

References

  1. IAEA, Non-linear Response to a Type of Seismic Input Motion, IAEA, n.d. http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/, 2011.
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA, Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design environmentSpecific Safety Requirements, No. SSR-2/1 (Rev.1), 2000.
  3. P.R. Donavin, R. Gilada, H. Gustin, T. Vo, R. Pace, Technical basis for proposed ASME section XI code case on beyond design bases earthquake, in: Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2016, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2016-63827.
  4. T. Watakabe, N. Kaneko, S. Aida, A. Otani, M. Moriizumi, K. Tsukimori, S. Kitamura, Study on piping response under multiple excitation Part 1: triple shaking table test of piping having three-supporting points, in: Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2013-97832.
  5. S. Kai, T. Watakabe, N. Kaneko, K. Tochiki, M. Moriizumi, K. Tsukimori, Study on piping response under multiple excitation Part 2: validation for multiple analysis of piping, in: Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2013-97841.
  6. T. Watakabe, K. Tsukimori, S. Kitamura, M. Morishita, Ultimate strength of a thin wall elbow for sodium cooled fast reactors under seismic loads, J. Press. Vessel Technol. Trans. ASME. 138 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031721.
  7. M. Morishita, A. Otani, T. Watakabe, I. Nakamura, T. Shibutani, M. Shiratori, Seismic qualification of piping systems by detailed inelastic response analysis part 1 - a Code Case for piping seismic evaluation based on detailed inelastic response analysis, in: Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2017, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65166.
  8. A. Otani, T. Shibutani, M. Morishita, I. Nakamura, T. Watakabe, M. Shiratori, Seismic qualification of piping systems by detailed inelastic response analysis part 2 - a guideline for piping seismic inelastic response analysis, in: Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2017, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65190.
  9. I. Nakamura, A. Otani, M. Morishita, M. Shiratori, T. Watakabe, T. Shibutani, Seismic qualification of piping systems by detailed inelastic response analysis part 3 - variation in elastic-plastic analysis results on carbon steel pipes from the benchmark analyses and the parametric analysis, in: Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2017, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65316.
  10. T. Watakabe, I. Nakamura, A. Otani, M. Morishita, T. Shibutani, M. Shiratori, Seismic qualification of piping systems by detailed inelastic response analysis Part 4 - second round benchmark analyses with stainless steel piping component test, in: Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2017, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65324.
  11. I. Nakamura, N. Kasahara, Excitation tests on elbow pipe specimens to investigate failure behavior under excessive seismic loads, in: Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2015, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2015-45711.
  12. D. Wang, C. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, Seismic response characteristics of baseisolated AP1000 nuclear shield building subjected to beyond-design basis earthquake shaking, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 170-181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.10.005.
  13. D. Wang, Y. Zhang, C. Wu, G. Xue, W. Huang, Seismic performance of base-isolated AP1000 shield building with consideration of fluid-structure interaction, Nucl. Eng. Des. 353 (2019) 110241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110241.
  14. W. Chen, Y. Zhang, D. Wang, C. Wu, Investigation on damage development of AP1000 nuclear power plant in strong ground motions with numerical simulation, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2019) 1669-1680, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.04.018.
  15. Y. Choi, J.B. Park, S.J. Lee, N.C. Park, Y.P. Park, J.S. Kim, W.J. Roh, Seismic analysis of the APR 1400 reactor vessel internals using the model reduction method, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53 (2016) 1701-1714, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2016.1152921.
  16. J. beom Park, S.J. Lee, E. ho Lee, N.C. Park, Y. beom Kim, Seismic responses of nuclear reactor vessel internals considering coolant flow under operating conditions, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2019) 1658-1668, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.04.013.
  17. Y. Choi, J.-B. Park, S.-J. Lee, N.-C. Park, Y.-P. Park, J.-S. Kim, W.-J. Roh, Model reduction methods for cylindrical structures in reactor internals considering the fluidestructure interaction, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53 (2016) 204-222, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1035352.
  18. J.B. Park, Y. Choi, S.J. Lee, N.C. Park, K.S. Park, Y.P. Park, C. Il Park, Modal characteristic analysis of the APR1400 nuclear reactor internals for seismic analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 46 (2014) 689-698, https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.09.2014.017.
  19. I. ANSYS, Ansys® Academic Research Mechanical, Release 19.2, (n.d.)..
  20. I. ANSYS, Ansys® Academic Research Mechanical, Release 19.2, Help System, Thoery Reference, ((n.d.)).
  21. S. Lee, E. Lee, Y. Choi, J. Kim, N. Park, Finite element analysis METHOLOGY reflecting neutron irradiation effects for structural analysis, in: SMiRT 25, IASMiRT, Charlotte, USA, 2019.
  22. EPRI, Material Reliability Program: Development of Material Constitutive Model for Irradiated Austenitic Stainless Steels, MRP-135-Rev. 1, (n.d).
  23. J.-S. Kim, J.-M. Seo, Y.-J. Kim, Y.-I. Choi, C.-S. Oh, Y.-B. Kim, Effect of neutron irradiation embrittlement on cyclic hardening behavior of core shroud assembly in pressurized water reactor under beyond-design basis earthquake. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140306, 2019.
  24. KAERI, Research of Irradiation Assisted Stress Corrosion Cracking for Nuclear Reactor Internals Materials | Materials Data Portal for Nuclear Application, n.d. http://mdportal.kaeri.re.kr/d20120020/. (Accessed 24 April 2020).
  25. KAERI, Final Report of the 4th Ex-Vessel Neutron Dosimetry Installation and Evaluations for Kori Unit 3 Reactor Pressure Vessel, 2010.
  26. J. Lee, H. Kim, Y. Kim, J. Kim, NOTCHED C ( T ) SPECIMEN SIMULATION UNDER CYCLIC LOADING, 2018, pp. 1-8.
  27. L. KOREA Electric Power Corporation and KOREA Hydro & Nuclear Power Co, ARP1400 Design Control Document Tier 2, 2013.
  28. H.-J. Kim, J.-K. Song, Evaluation of seismic fragility curve of seismically isolated nuclear power plant structures for artificial synthetic earthquakes corresponding to maximum-minimum spectrum, J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea. 23 (2019) 89-99, https://doi.org/10.5000/eesk.2019.23.2.089.
  29. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. NRC/RG 1.61 (rev.1), Damping Values for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, 2007.
  30. G. Shin, O. Song, A time-domain method to generate artificial time history from a given reference response spectrum, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 48 (2016) 831-839, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.01.023.
  31. ASCE, Seismic Design Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities, ASCE/SEI 4, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784407622.
  32. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee on Nuclear Power, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Appendices, 2015th, ASME, 2011, pp. 189-190, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439812174-14.
  33. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee on Materials, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, Part D, 2019th ed., 2019.