DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Verification and validation of isotope inventory prediction for back-end cycle management using two-step method

  • Jang, Jaerim (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ebiwonjumi, Bamidele (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Wonkyeong (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Cherezov, Alexey (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Jinsu (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Deokjung (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2020.02.23
  • 심사 : 2021.01.07
  • 발행 : 2021.07.25

초록

This paper presents the verification and validation (V&V) of a calculation module for isotope inventory prediction to control the back-end cycle of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). The calculation method presented herein was implemented in a two-step code system of a lattice code STREAM and a nodal diffusion code RAST-K. STREAM generates a cross section and provides the number density information using branch/history depletion branch calculations, whereas RAST-K supplies the power history and three history indices (boron concentration, moderator temperature, and fuel temperature). As its primary feature, this method can directly consider three-dimensional core simulation conditions using history indices of the operating conditions. Therefore, this method reduces the computation time by avoiding a recalculation of the fuel depletion. The module for isotope inventory calculates the number densities using the Lagrange interpolation method and power history correction factors, which are applied to correct the effects of the decay and fission products generated at different power levels. To assess the reliability of the developed code system for back-end cycle analysis, validation study was performed with 58 measured samples of pressurized water reactor (PWR) SNF, and code-to-code comparison was conducted with STREAM-SNF, HELIOS-1.6 and SCALE 5.1. The V&V results presented that the developed code system can provide reasonable results with comparable confidence intervals. As a result, this paper successfully demonstrates that the isotope inventory prediction code system can be used for spent nuclear fuel analysis.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT). (No. NRF-2019M2D2A1A03058371).

참고문헌

  1. B. Ebiwonjumi, S. Choi, M. Lemaire, D. Lee, H.C. Shin, H.S. Lee, Validation of lattice physics code STREAM for predicting pressurized water reactor spent nuclear fuel isotopic inventory, Ann. Nucl. Energy 120 (2018) 431-449, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.06.002.
  2. A. Mohammadi, M. Hassanzadeh, M. Gharib, Shielding calculation and criticality safety analysis of spent fuel transportation cask in research reactors, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 108 (2016) 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.12.045
  3. N. Mai, P.Z.M. Lemaire, B. Ebiwonjumi, W. Kim, H. Lee, D. Lee, Extension of Monte Carlo code MCS to spent fuel cask shielding analysis, Int. J. Energy Res. 44 (2020) 8089-8102, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5023.
  4. J. Jang, W. Kim, S. Jeong, E. Jeong, J. Park, M. Lemaire, H. Lee, Y. Jo, P. Zhang, D. Lee, Validation of UNIST Monte Carlo code MCS for criticality safety analysis of PWR spent fuel pool and storage cask, Ann. Nucl. Energy 114 (2018) 495-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.12.054
  5. NUREG/CR-6747, Computational Benchmark for Estimation of Reactivity Margin from Fission Products and Minor Actinides in PWR Burnup Credit, ORNL, 2001. ORNL/TM-2000/306.
  6. J.-Ch. Sublet, J.W. Eastwood, J.G. Morgan, M.R. Gilbert, M. Fleming, W. Arter, FISPACT-II: an advanced simulation system for activation, in: Transmutation and Material Modelling, Nuclear Data Sheets 139, 2017, pp. 77-173, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2017.01.002.
  7. Status of spent fuel storage for the first quarter of 2019 [Online] (available from: http://www.khnp.co.kr/board/BRD_000179/board View.do?pageIndex=1&boardSeq=70138&mnCd=FN051304&schPageUnit=10&searchCondition=0&searchKeyword=, 2019e. Accessed on April 2019.
  8. S. Choi, C. Lee, D. Lee, Resonance treatment using pin-based pointwise energy slowing-down method, J. Comput. Phys. 330 (2017) 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.11.007
  9. S. Choi, D. Lee, Three-dimensional method of characteristics/diamond-difference transport analysis method in STREAM for whole-core neutron transport calculation, Comput. Phys. Commun. (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107332.
  10. M.B. Chadwick, ENDF/B-VII.0: next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology, Nucl. Data Sheets 107 (12) (2006) 2931-3060, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001.
  11. J. Jang, B. Ebiwonjumi, W. Kim, J. Park, D. Lee, Verification and Validation of Back-End Cycle Source Term Calculation of the Nodal Code RAST-K, PHYSOR 2020: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future Cambridge, United Kingdom, March 29-April 2, 2020.
  12. J. Jang, B. Ebiwonjumi, W. Kim, J. Park, J. Choe, D. Lee., Validation of spent nuclear fuel decay heat calculation by a two-step method, Nucl. Eng. Tech, accepted to publish, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.06.028.
  13. B. Ebiwonjumi, S. Choi, M. Lemaire, D. Lee, H.C. Shin, H.S. Lee, Verification and validation of radiation source term capabilities in STREAM, Ann. Nucl. Energy 124 (2019) 80-87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.09.034.
  14. G. Radulescu, I.C. Gauld, G. Ilas, SCALE 5.1 Predictions of PWR Spent Nuclear Fuel Isotopic Compositions, March 2010. ORNL/TM-2010/44.
  15. J. Choe, S. Choi, P. Zhang, J. Park, W. Kim, H.C. Shin, H.S. Lee, J. Jung, D. Lee, Verification and validation of STREAM/RAST-K for PWR analysis, Nucl. Eng. Tech. 51 (2) (2019) 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.10.004
  16. J. Park, J. Choe, H. Kim, S. Choi, A. Cherezov, J. Jang, D. Yun, N.N.T. Mai, V. Dos, D. Lee, H.C. Shin, H.S. Lee, Development status of nodal diffusion code RAST-K v2.2, in: KNS Spring Meeting Jeju, May 22-24, 2019.
  17. A. Quarteroni, R. Sacco, F. Saleri, Numerical Mathematics, 2007.
  18. S. Borresen, Spent fuel analyses based on in-core fuel management calculations, in: Proc. of PHYSOR 2004, the Physics of Fuel Cycles and Advanced Nuclear Systems: Global Developments, Chicago, Illinois, April 25-29, 2004.
  19. R.J.J. Stamm'ler, M.J. Abbate, Methods of Steady-State Reactor Physics in Nuclear Design, Academic Press, 1983, p. 384.
  20. Y. Nakahara, K. Suyama, J. Inagawa, R. Nagaishi, S. Kurosawa, N. Kohno, M. Onuki, H. Mochizuki, Nuclide composition benchmark dataset for verifying burnup codes on spent light water reactor fuels, Nucl. Technol. 137 (2) (2002) 111-126, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT02-2.
  21. N. Soppera, M. Bossant, E. Dupont, JANIS 4: an improved version of the NEA java-based nuclear data information system, Nucl. Data Sheets 120 (2014) 294-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.071
  22. O. Leray, D. Rochman, P. Grimm, H. Ferroukhi, A. Vasiliev, M. Hursin, G. Perret, A. Pautz, Nuclear data uncertainty propagation on spent fuel nuclide compositions, Ann. Nucl. Energy 94 (2016) 603-611, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.03.023.
  23. Guide for Validation of Nuclear Criticality Safety Calculational Methodology, U.S. National Regulatory Commission, 2001. NUREG/CR-6698.
  24. Curve Fitting Toolbox User's Guide, MathWorks, Inc., July 2001.
  25. Isotopic Analysis of High-Burnup PWR Spent Fuel Samples from the Takahama-3 Reactor, NUREG/CR-6798, ORNL/TM-2001/259, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Washington, DC 20555-0001.
  26. S. M. Bowman, M. E. Dunn, D. F. Hollenbach, W. C. Jordan, SCALE Cross-Section Libraries, Vol. III, Sect. M4 in SCALE: A Modular Code System for Performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluations, ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 5.1, Vols. IeIII, November 2006. Available from: Radiation Safety Information Computational Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory as CCC-732.
  27. IAEA, Nuclear energy series, No.NF-T-3.8, impact of high burnup uranium oxide and mixed uraniumeplutonium oxide water reactor fuel on spent fuel management. https://www.iaea.org/publications/8428/impact-of-high-burnup-uranium-oxide-and-mixed-uranium-plutonium-oxide-water-reactor-fuel-on-spent-fuel-management.