Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Color assessment of resin composite by using cellphone images compared with a spectrophotometer

  • Received : 2020.09.04
  • Accepted : 2020.11.03
  • Published : 2021.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed the reliability of digital color measurements using images of resin composite specimens captured with a cellphone. Materials and Methods: The reference color of cylindrical specimens built-up with the use of resin composite (shades A1, A2, A3, and A4) was measured with a portable spectrophotometer (CIELab). Images of the specimens were obtained individually or pairwise (compared shades in the same photograph) under standardized parameters. The color of the specimens was measured in the images using RGB system and converted to CIELab system using image processing software. Whiteness index (WID) and color differences (ΔE00) were calculated for each color measurement method. For the cellphone, the ΔE00 was calculated between the pairs of shades in separate images and in the same image. Data were analyzed using 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Linear regression models were used to predict the reference ΔE00 values of those calculated using color measured in the images. Results: Images captured with the cellphone resulted in different WID values from the spectrophotometer only for shades A3 and A4. No difference to the reference ΔE00 was observed when individual images were used. In general, a similar ranking of ΔE00 among resin composite shades was observed for all methods. Stronger correlation coefficients with the reference ΔE00 were observed using individual than pairwise images. Conclusions: This study showed that the use of cellphone images to measure the color difference seems to be a feasible alternative providing outcomes similar to those obtained with the spectrophotometer.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Educational Personnel -, Brazil (grant CAPES/PROCAD #3001/2014, and Finance Code 001).

References

  1. Trifkovic B, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Color adjustment potential of resin composites. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:1601-1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2260-6
  2. Westland S, Luo W, Li Y, Pan Q, Joiner A. Investigation of the perceptual thresholds of tooth whiteness. J Dent 2017;67S:S11-S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.013
  3. Correa AC, Santana TR, Nahsan FP, Loguercio AD, Faria-E-Silva AL. The impact of a customized tray on in-office bleaching tooth sensitivity: a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2016;41:15-22. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-029-C
  4. Fernandes MT, Vaez SC, Lima CM, Nahsan FP, Loguercio AD, Faria-E-Silva AL. Preemptive use of naproxen on tooth sensitivity caused by in-office bleaching: a triple-blind, crossover, randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2017;42:486-496. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-100-C
  5. Peixoto AC, Vaez SC, Soares KD, Ferreira LF, Loguercio AD, Faria-E-Silva AL. Preemptive use of piroxicam on tooth sensitivity caused by in-office bleaching: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent J 2019;30:498-504. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902762
  6. Gokce HS, Piskin B, Ceyhan D, Gokce SM, Arisan V. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60020-0
  7. Imbery TA, Tran D, Baechle MA, Hankle JL, Janus C. Dental shade matching and value discernment abilities of first-year dental students. J Prosthodont 2018;27:821-827. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12781
  8. Corcodel N, Krisam J, Klotz AL, Deisenhofer UK, Stober T, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P, Zenthofer A. Evaluation of small-group education on the shade determination ability of preclinical dental students-a controlled clinical trial. Eur J Dent Educ 2018;22:e582-e587.
  9. Rezende M, Chemin K, Vaez SC, Peixoto AC, Rabelo JF, Braga SSL, Faria-E-Silva AL, Silva GR, Soares CJ, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of topical application of dipyrone on dental sensitivity reduction after in-office dental bleaching: a randomized, triple-blind multicenter clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2018;149:363-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.11.003
  10. Klaric Sever E, Budimir Z, Cerovac M, Stambuk M, Par M, Negovetic Vranic D, Tarle Z. Clinical and patient reported outcomes of bleaching effectiveness. Acta Odontol Scand 2018;76:30-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1376111
  11. Vaez SC, Correia A, Santana TR, Santana M, Peixoto AC, Leal PC, Faria-E-Silva AL. Is a single preliminary session of in-office bleaching beneficial for the effectiveness of at-home tooth bleaching? a randomized controlled clinical trial. Oper Dent 2019;44:E180-E189. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-196-C
  12. Pereira R, Corado D, Silveira J, Alves R, Mata A, Marques D. Dental prophylaxis influence in tooth color assessment-clinical study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:586-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12593
  13. Wee AG, Meyer A, Wu W, Wichman CS. Lighting conditions used during visual shade matching in private dental offices. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:469-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.020
  14. Igiel C, Lehmann KM, Ghinea R, Weyhrauch M, Hangx Y, Scheller H, Paravina RD. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:303-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12321
  15. Sullivan C, Pan Q, Westland S, Ellwood R. A yellowness index for use in dentistry. J Dent 2019;91:103244
  16. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent 2010;38 Supplement 2:e2-e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001
  17. Joiner A, Luo W. Tooth colour and whiteness: a review. J Dent 2017;67S:S3-S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.006
  18. Gomez-Polo C, Portillo Munoz M, Lorenzo Luengo MC, Vicente P, Galindo P, Martin Casado AM. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.001
  19. Perez MM, Ghinea R, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Ionescu AM, Paravina RD, Herrera LJ. Development of a customized whiteness index for dentistry based on CIELAB color space. Dent Mater 2016;32:461-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.008
  20. Luo MR, Cui BR, Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl 2001;26:340-350. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.1049
  21. Brook AH, Smith RN, Lath DJ. The clinical measurement of tooth colour and stain. Int Dent J 2007;57:324-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2007.tb00141.x
  22. Bhandari R, Thakur S, Singhal P, Chauhan D, Jayam C, Jain T. In vivo comparative evaluation of esthetics after microabrasion and microabrasion followed by casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate on molar incisor hypomineralization-affected incisors. Contemp Clin Dent 2019;10:9-15. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_852_17
  23. Jarad FD, Russell MD, Moss BW. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2005;199:43-49. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812559
  24. Yamanel K, Caglar A, Ozcan M, Gulsah K, Bagis B. Assessment of color parameters of composite resin shade guides using digital imaging versus colorimeter. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22:379-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00370.x
  25. Tam WK, Lee HJ. Dental shade matching using a digital camera. J Dent 2012;40 Supplement 2:e3-e10.
  26. Guan YH, Lath DL, Lilley TH, Willmot DR, Marlow I, Brook AH. The measurement of tooth whiteness by image analysis and spectrophotometry: a comparison. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:7-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01340.x
  27. Perez MM, Herrera LJ, Carrillo F, Pecho OE, Dudea D, Gasparik C, Ghinea R, Bona AD. Whiteness difference thresholds in dentistry. Dent Mater 2019;35:292-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.022
  28. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, do Amaral EA, Cardona JC, Della Bona A, Perez MM. Relevant optical properties for direct restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016;32:e105-e112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.02.008
  29. Santos SMM, Silva PD, Faria-E-Silva AL. Color changes caused by reduction on the dentin shade composite thickness. Braz Dent J 2018;29:469-474. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201802394
  30. Dain SJ. Illuminant and observer metamerism and the Hardy-Rand-Rittler color vision test editions. Vis Neurosci 2006;23:685-694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095252380623356X
  31. Spink LS, Rungruanganut P, Megremis S, Kelly JR. Comparison of an absolute and surrogate measure of relative translucency in dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2013;29:702-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.021
  32. Tung OH, Lai YL, Ho YC, Chou IC, Lee SY. Development of digital shade guides for color assessment using a digital camera with ring flashes. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:49-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0366-1
  33. Lazar R, Culic B, Gasparik C, Lazar C, Dudea D. The accuracy of dental shade matching using cross-polarization photography. Int J Comput Dent 2019;22:343-351.
  34. Mahn E, Tortora SC, Olate B, Cacciuttolo F, Kernitsky J, Jorquera G. Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:511-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.002