한국미생물·생명공학회지 (Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters)

  • 제49권2호
  • /
  • Pages.210-216
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1598-642X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7305(eISSN)
한국미생물·생명공학회 (The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CRISPR/CAS9을 이용하여 lipid elongation gene의 과발현을 통한 효모의 에탄올 발효능 개선

Enhancement of Ethanol Productivity with Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Overexpression of Lipid Elongation Gene Using CRISPR/CAS9

  • 김진아 (부경대학교 생물공학과) ;
  • 정귀택 (부경대학교 생물공학과)
  • Kim, JinA (Department of Biotechnology, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Jeong, Gwi-Taek (Department of Biotechnology, Pukyong National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.22
  • 심사 : 2021.03.24
  • 발행 : 2021.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 CRISPR/CAS9을 이용하여 S. cerevisiae의 ACC1, ELO1, OLE1 유전자의 프로모터를 TEF1으로 교체하여 그 발현량을 증가시키고 그에 따른 에탄올에 대한 저항성과 생산량 변화를 확인하였다. 18% 에탄올이 함유된 YPD 배지에서 control을 제외하고 유전자 과발현을 일으킨 mutant 균주 모두가 24시간까지 viable하게 생존하는 것을 확인하였다. 에탄올 발효에서는 유전자 과발현 균주 모두가 에탄올 수율에서 ACC1 과발현 균주가 428.18 ± 0.29 mg/g, ELO1 과발현 균주는 416.15 ± 4.3 mg/g, OLE1 과발현 균주는 430.55 ± 6.00 mg/g에 도달하였으며, 이는 control의 수율인 400.26 ± 0.42 mg/g 보다 높은 수준에 도달하였다. 이 결과는 높은 농도의 에탄올에서 탄소 사슬이 긴 불포화지방산의 비율이 증가한다는 연구결과가 역 또한 성립한다는 것을 증명하였다. ELO1의 과발현은 elongation of fatty acid protein의 생산 증가를 불러 일으킨다. 또한 OLE1도 acylCoA desaturase 효소의 활성을 증대시킨다. TEF1이라는 strong promoter를 이용한 이번 실험에서 ELO1 과발현 균주가 OLE1 과발현 균주보다 S. cerevisiae의 에탄올 저해 감소와 발효에 긍정적인 영향을 미침을 확인하였다.

This study aimed to enhance ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through genome editing using CRISPR/CAS9. To increase ethanol productivity, ACC1, ELO1, and OLE1 were overexpressed in S. cerevisiae using the CRISPR/CAS9 system. The strains overexpressing ACC1, ELO1, and OLE1 survived up to 24 h in YPD medium supplemented with 18% ethanol. Moreover, the ethanol yields in strains overexpressing ACC1 (428.18 mg ethanol/g glucose), ELO1 (416.15 mg ethanol/g glucose), and OLE1 (430.55 mg ethanol/g glucose) were higher than those in the control strains (400.26 mg ethanol/g glucose). In conclusion, the overexpression of these genes increased the viability of S. cerevisiae at high ethanol concentrations and the ethanol productivity without suppressing glucose consumption.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wheals AE, Basso LC, Alves DMG, Amorim HV. 1999. Fuel ethanol after 25 years. Trends Biotechnol. 17: 482-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01384-0
  2. Lin Y, Zhang W, Li C, Sakakibara K, Tanaka S, Kong H. 2012. Factors affecting ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4742. Biomass Bioenerg. 47: 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.019
  3. Posada JA, Patel AD, Roes A, Blok K, Faaij APC, Patel MK. 2013. Potential of bioethanol as a chemical building block for biorefineries: Preliminary sustainability assessment of 12 bioethanol-based products. Bioresour. Technol. 135: 490-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.058
  4. Bharti B, Madhulika C. 2016. Bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae with different perspectives: Substrates, growth variables, inhibitor reduction and immobilization. Ferment. Technol. 5: 131-134.
  5. Liu Y, Nielsen J. 2019. Recent trends in metabolic engineering of microbial chemical factories. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 60: 188-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.05.010
  6. Mojovic L, Pejin D, Rakin M, Pejin J, Nikolic S, Djukic-Vukovic A. 2012. How to improve the economy of bioethanol production in Serbia. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 16: 6040-6047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.001
  7. Balat M, Balat H. 2009. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Appl. Energy 86: 2273-2282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.015
  8. Stovicek V, Borodina I, Forste Jn. 2015. CRISPR-Cas system enables fast and simple genome editing of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab. Eng. Commun. 2: 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meteno.2015.03.001
  9. Tian P, Wang J, Shen X, Rey JF, Yuan Q, Yan Y. 2017. Fundamental CRISPR-Cas9 tools and current applications in microbial systems. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2: 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2017.08.006
  10. Chin YW, Kang WK, Jang HW, Turner TL, Kim HJ. 2016. CAR1 deletion by CRISPR/Cas9 reduces formation of ethyl carbamate from ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43: 1517-1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-016-1831-x
  11. Zhao XQ, Bai FW. 2009. Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production J. Biotechnol. 144: 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.05.001
  12. Teixeira MC, Raposo LR, Mira NP, Lourenco AB, Sa-Correia I. 2009. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 5761-5772. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00845-09
  13. Azhar SHM, Abdulla R, Jambo SA, Marbawi H, Gansau JA, Faik AA, et al. 2017. Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 10: 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003
  14. Casey GP, Ingledew WM. 1985. Ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 13: 219-280. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408418609108739
  15. Li P, Fu X, Zhang L, Li S. 2019. CRISPR/Cas-based screening of a gene activation library in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies a crucial role of OLE1 in thermotolerance. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 12: 1154-1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13333
  16. Kajiwara S, Aritomi T, Suga K, Ohtaguchi K, Kobayashi O. 2000. Overexpression of the OLE1gene enhances ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 53: 568-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051658
  17. Ingram LO. 1990. Ethanol tolerance in bacteria. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 9: 305-319. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388558909036741
  18. Torija MJ, Beltran G, Novo M, Poblet M, Guillamon JM, Mas A, et al. 2003. Effects of fermentation temperature and Saccharomyces species on the cell fatty acid composition and presence of volatile compounds in wine. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 85: 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00506-8
  19. Alexandre H, Rousseaux I, Charpentier C. 1994. Relationship between ethanol tolerance, lipid composition and plasma membrane fluidity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculate. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 124: 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07255.x
  20. Tehlivets O, Scheuringer K, Kohlwein SD. 2007. Fatty acid synthesis and elongation in yeast. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1771: 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.07.004
  21. Dittrich F, Zajonc D, Huhne K, Hoja U, Ekici A, Greiner E, et al. 1988. Fatty acid elongation in yeast--biochemical characteristics of the enzyme system and isolation of elongation-defective mutants. Eur. J. Biochem. 252: 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2520477.x
  22. Schirmaier F, Philippsen P. 1984. Identification of two genes coding for the translation elongation factor EF-la of S. cerevisiae. EMBO J. 3: 3311-3315. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02295.x
  23. Kitamoto N, Matsui J, Kawai Y, Kato A, Yoshino S, Ohmiya K, et al. 1998. Utilization of the TEF1-α gene (TEF1) promoter for expression of polygalacturonase genes, pgaA and pgaB in Aspergillus oryzae. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 50: 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051260
  24. Kim SR, Xu H, Lesmana A, Kuzmanovic U, Au M, Florencia C, et al. 2015. Deletion of PHO13, encoding haloacid dehalogenase type IIA phosphatase, results in upregulation of the pentose phosphate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81: 1601-1609. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03474-14
  25. Wang Y, Zhang S, Liu H, Zhang L, Yi C, Li H. 2015. Changes and roles of membrane compositions in the adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ethanol. Basic Microbiol. 55: 1417-1426. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201500300
  26. Beaven MJ, Charpentier C, Rose AH. 1982. Production and tolerance of ethanol in relation to phospholipid fatty-acyl composition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC 431. J. Gen. Microbiol. 128: 1447- 1455.
  27. Dong SJ, Yi CF, Li H. 2015. Changes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell membrane components and promotion to ethanol tolerance during the bioethanol fermentation. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 69: 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2015.10.025
  28. Lewis JA, Elkon IM, McGee MA, Gasch AP. 2010. Exploiting natural variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes for increased ethanol resistance. Genetics 186: 1197-1205. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.121871
  29. Yan GL, Duan LL, Liu PT, Duan CQ. 2019. Transcriptional comparison investigating the influence of the addition of unsaturated fatty acids on aroma compounds during alcoholic fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 10: 1115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01115
  30. Caspeta L, Castillo T, Nielsen J. 2015. Modifying yeast tolerance to inhibitory conditions of ethanol production processes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3:184. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00184
  31. van Uden N. 1985. Chapter 2 - Ethanol toxicity and ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Ann. Rep. Ferment. Processes 8: 11-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-040308-0.50006-9
  32. Salgueiro SP, Correia IS, Novais JM. 1988. Ethanol-induced leakage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Kinetics and relationship to yeast ethanol tolerance and alcohol fermentation productivity. Environ. Microbiol. 54: 903-909. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.4.903-909.1988