환경생물 (Korean Journal of Environmental Biology)

  • 제39권1호
  • /
  • Pages.108-118
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-9999(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7851(eISSN)
한국환경생물학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Biology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

계방천에 서식하는 열목어의 개체군 특성 및 물리적 서식환경과의 상관관계

The relationship between the population characteristics and physical habitat of Manchurian trout(Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis) in the Geybangcheon stream

  • Ko, Min Seop (Department of Biological Science, College of Science & Engineering, Sangji University) ;
  • Choi, Jun Kil (Department of Biological Science, College of Science & Engineering, Sangji University) ;
  • Lee, Hwang Goo (Department of Biological Science, College of Science & Engineering, Sangji University)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.04
  • 심사 : 2021.03.23
  • 발행 : 2021.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 홍천군 명개리 열목어 서식지인 계방천의 어류 군집과 열목어 개체군 특성 및 서식지 주변 토지이용에 따른 상관성을 파악하고자 수행하였다. 조사는 2018년 7월, 9월, 10월 총 3회 조사를 실시하였다. 조사결과 총 6과 13종 882개체의 어류가 채집되었으며, 우점종은 금강모치, 아우점종은 참갈겨니로 확인되었다. 채집된 어류 중 법정보호종은 멸종위기야생생물 II급인 열목어와 가는돌고기가 출현하였으며, 천연기념물 제259호인 어름치가 확인되었다. 한국고유종은 총 10종으로 76.92%의 매우 높은 고유종 빈도로 나타났다. 계방천에서 열목어 추가조사를 포함하여 3회 조사 동안 총 99개체의 열목어가 채집되었다. 열목어 개체군의 생육상태와 생식능력 정도를 파악할 수 있는 전장-체중 상관관계 분석 및 비만도 지수(k) 분석을 실시한 결과 열목어의 회귀계수 b값은 3.1272, 비만도 지수(k)는 0.0006으로 분석되어 조사지역의 열목어 개체군은 비교적 안정적인 생육상태를 유지하고 있는 것으로 확인되었으나, 비교적 낮은 값을 유지하는 것으로 나타났다. 전장빈도분포 분석 결과 당년생 60~130mm, 1년생 140~200 mm, 2년생 이상의 개체는 200 mm로 추정되었다. QHEI는 130.0 (±2.0)~159.0 (±1.0)의 범위인 '양호~최적' 등급으로 분석되었다. HSI를 분석한 결과 최적의 수심은 0.45~0.55 m와 1.0 m 이상, 최적의 유속은 0.55~0.65m s-1, 하상은 Boulder를 선호하는 것으로 확인되었다. 조사지점별 인근 토지이용 비율을 분석한 결과 산림지역 66.26~96.31%, 농업지역 0.00~23.79%, 도시지역 0.00~4.19%, 기타지역 3.69~8.87%로 분석되어 대부분의 지점에서 산림의 비율이 높게 나타났으며, 다음으로 농업지역의 비율이 높게 나타났다. 지점별 출현한 열목어 개체수와 다양한 항목 간의 상관성 분석을 실시한 결과, QHEI와 산림지역과는 양의 상관성(p<0.05), 농업지역과 도시지역과는 음의 상관성(p<0.05, p<0.01)으로 분석되어 서식지 주변의 토지이용 유형 및 변화 정도에 따라 열목어 개체군에 많은 영향을 미치며, 열목어 개체군 보호 및 관리를 위해는 서식지 주변 토지이용에 따른 관리방안 마련이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

The purpose of this study was to provide baseline ecological data for the conservation of the Manchurian trout habitat through the investigation of the growth status of Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis, and Pearson's correlation analysis (PCA) between the B. lenok tsinlingensis population and the use of the land around Gyebangcheon stream. Sampling was conducted twice in July, September, and October 2018. During the July and September surveys, 882 individuals belonging to 13 species from six families were collected. The dominant species was Rhynchocypris kumgangensis and the subdominant species was Zacco koreanus. The total number of B. lenok tsinlingensis collected was 99. The results of the length-weight relationship in the B. lenok tsinlingensis population were analyzed with a regression coefficient b value of 3.1272 and a condition factor (k) value of 0.0006. Therefore, the growth condition of B. lenok tsinlingensis was regarded as fairly good. The QHEI(Qualitative habitat evaluation index) value in the B. lenok tsinlingensis habitat was 119.5(±0.5)-153.5(±0.5), indicating optimal-suboptimal conditions. As a result of the HIS (Habitat suitability index) analysis, it was confirmed that the optimal habitat for B. lenok tsinlingensis was 0.45-0.55m and >1 m in water depth, 0.55-0.65 m s-1 in water velocity, and boulder in the substrate. The ratio of the land use in this study site was analyzed as 66.26-96.31% for forest and grassland areas, 0.00-23.79% for agricultural areas, 0.00-4.19% for urbanized areas, and 3.69-8.87% for others. Correlation analysis of the number of B. lenok tsinlingensis and various factors revealed statistically significant correlations between QHEI and forest and grassland areas, agricultural areas, and urbanized areas.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 홍천군(과제번호: 201800840001, 홍천 명개리 열목어 서식지 서식실태조사 용역)의 지원을 받아 수행되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. Anderson R and S Gutreuter. 1983. Length, weight and associated structural indices. pp. 283-300. In: Fisheries Techniques (Nielsen L and D Johnson, eds.). American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, MD.
  2. Anderson RO and RM Neumann. 1996. Length, weight, and associated structural indices. pp. 447-482. In: Fisheries Techniques (Murphy BR and DW Willis, eds.). American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, MD.
  3. Baek HM and HB Song. 2005. Habitat selection and environmental characters of Acheilognathus signifer. Korean J. Lomnol. 38:352-360.
  4. Bagenal T. 1978. Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford, England. pp. 48-116.
  5. Busacker GP, IA Adelman and EM Goolish. 1990. Growth. In: Methods for Fish Biology (Schreck CB and PB Moyle, eds.). American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, MD.
  6. Byeon HK. 2011. The characteristic of fish fauna and Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis individuals in the Bonghwa-gun, Korea. Korea J. Environ. Ecol. 25:878-886.
  7. Carl BS and BB Peter. 1990. Methods for Fish Biology. American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, MD. p. 684.
  8. Choi JK and HK Byeon. 2009. The fish fauna and community of Gwangneung arboretum. Korean J. Limnol. 42:145-152.
  9. Choi JK, HK Byeon and HK Seok. 2000. Studies on the dynamics of fish community in Wonju stream. Korean J. Limnol. 33:274-281.
  10. Choi JK, HS Shin and JS Choi. 2005. Fish community analysis in the Wonju stream. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 19:46-54.
  11. Choi KC. 1988. Effective conservation management of B. lenok tsinlingensis habitats. Nat. Res. Inst. Cult. Herit. 21:18-38.
  12. Choi KC, SR Jeon, IS Kim and YM Son. 2002. Colored Illustrations of the Freshwater Fishes of Korea. Hyangmunsa Press Co. Seoul. pp. 154-156.
  13. Craig DA. 1987. Some of what you should know about water or, KISS for hydrodynamics. Bull. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 4:178-182.
  14. Cummins KW. 1962. An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic water. Am. Midl. Nat. 67:477-504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2422722
  15. Han SC, HY Lee, JH Shin and JE Lee. 2007. Fish fauna and weight-length relationships for 9 fish species in Andong reservoir. Korean J. Life Sci. 17:937-943. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2007.17.7.937
  16. Hur JW, DH Kim and HS Kang. 2014. Estimation of optimal ecological flowrate of fish in Chogang Stream. Ecol. Resil. Infrastruct. 1:39-48. https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2014.1.1.039
  17. Jang JE, JH Kim, JH Kang, SY Baek, JH Wang, HG Lee, JK Choi, JS Choi and HJ Lee. 2017. Genetic diversity and genetic structure of the endangered Manchurian trout, Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis, at its southern range margin: conservation implications for future restoration. Conserv. Genet. 18:1023-1036.
  18. Jeon SR. 1980. Studies on the distribution of freshwater fishes from Korea. PhD. Thesis, Chungang University. Seoul. pp. 14-49.
  19. Joo GJ, HW Kim and K Lee. 1997. The development of stream ecology and current status in Korea. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 20:69-78.
  20. Kang HS. 2012. Comparision of physical habitat suitability index for fishes in the rivers of Han and Geum river watersheds. J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng. 32:71-78.
  21. Karr JR and EW Chu. 2000. Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobiologia 422/423:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017097611303
  22. Kim HS, H Yang and YK Hong. 2014. Population ecology of endangered fish Gobiobotia naktongensis inhabiting the Gamcheon Stream, Nakdonggang River (Pisces: Gobioninae). Korean J. Ichthyol. 26:1-10.
  23. Kim IS. 1997. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Fauna & Flora of Korean. Ministry of Education. Sejong, Korea.
  24. Kim IS and JY Park. 2002. Freshwater Fishes of Korea. Kyohak. Seoul.
  25. Kim IS, Y Choi, CL Lee, YJ Lee, BJ Kim and JH Kim. 2005. Illustrated Book of Korean Fishes. Kyohak. Seoul. p. 615.
  26. Kim JE and HG Lee. 2018. The evaluation of potential invasive species in the Gangneungnamdae Stream in Korea using a Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 36:73-81. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2018.36.1.073
  27. Kim JH, JD Yoon, HB Jo, KH Chang and MH Jang. 2012. Stream health assessment on Hoeya River Basin and other streams based on fish community and land use in the surrounding watersheds. Korean J. Limnol. 45:392-402. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2012.45.4.392
  28. Kim JJ, JG Choi and HS Choi. 2019. A study on the improvement of fish habitat through various river restoration techniques in the Wonju-cheon Stream, Korea. Korean J. Ecol. Resil. Infrastruct. 6:145-153.
  29. Kim JW, SW Ryu, JK Lee, JW Park, YK Lee, JH Shim, YH Kang, SK Kim, GJ Joo, GY Kim, YH Do, CW Lee and JD Yoon. 2009. Stream Ecology and the Nakdong River. Keimyung University Press. Daegu, Korea.
  30. Kim SJ, MS Shin, JK Kim, JY Lee, KJ Jeong, BY Ahn and BC Kim. 2012. Oxygen fluctuation monitored with high frequency in a eutrophic urban stream (the Anyang Stream) and the effect of weather condition. Korean J. Limnol. 45:34-41.
  31. Ko MH, SJ Moon and IC Bang. 2011. Study of the fish community structure and inhabiting status of the endanger species Gobiobotia macrocephala and G. brevibarba in the Seom River, Korea. Korean J. Limnol. 44:144-154.
  32. Ko MS, JK Choi and HG Lee. 2019. Ecological health assessments using fish communities in the habitat of Manchurian trout. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 37:652-663. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2019.37.4.652
  33. Lee DJ, HK Byeon and JK Choi. 2009. Characteristics of fish community in Gap Stream by habitat type. Korean J. Limnol. 42:340-349.
  34. Lee SR, MC Kim, JH Jeong, JN Park and JJ Kim. 2013. Comparision of microhabitat of Branchymystax lenok tsinlingensis in Odaesna National Park. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Con. 23:18.
  35. Li S. 1984. Discussions on the geographical distribution of the salmonid fishes in China. Chin. J. Zool. 1:34-37.
  36. Li SC. 1966. On a new subspecies of fresh-water trout, Branchymystax lenok tsinlingensis, from Taipaishan, Shensi, China. Acta Zootaxon Sin. 3:92-94.
  37. Margalef R. 1958. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst. 3:36-71.
  38. McNaughton SJ. 1967. Relationship among functional properties of California grassland. Nature 216:168-169. https://doi.org/10.1038/216168b0
  39. Montgomery WL, SD McCormick, RJ Naiman, FGJ Whoriskey and GA Black. 1983. Spring migratory synchrony of salmonid, catostomid and cyprinid fishes in Riviere a la Truite, Quebec. Can. J. Zool. 61:2495-2502. https://doi.org/10.1139/z83-331
  40. Nam MM, HY Yang, BS Chae and YJ Kang. 1998. The Fish fauna and community structure in the Naerin Stream. Korean J. Ichthyol. 10:61-66.
  41. Nelson JS. 2006. Fishes of the World (4th ed.). John Wiley and Sons. New York. p. 601.
  42. Ney JJ. 1993. Practical use of biological statistics. pp. 137-158. In: Inland Fisheries Management of North America (Kohler CC and WA Hubert, eds.). American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, MD.
  43. Park SA and MW Lee. 2008. Stream restoration guidelines by evaluation of fish habitat and introducing of the keystone species. J. Korean Environ. Restor. Tech. 11:24-36.
  44. Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological Diversity. John Wiley and Sons. New York. p. 165.
  45. Plafkin JL, MT Barbour, KD Porter, SK Gross and RM Hughes. 1989. Rapid Assessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. EPA/444/4-89-001. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. EPA. Washington, DC.
  46. Rand TA and SA Louda. 2006. Spillover of agriculturally subsidized predators as a potential threat to native insect herbivores in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 20:1720-1729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00507.x
  47. Rutherford DA, AA Echelle and OE Maughan. 1987. Changes in the fauna of the little river drainage, South-Eastern Oklahama, 1945-1955 to 1981-1982 : a test of the hypothesis of environmental degradation. pp. 178-183. In: Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes. University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, OK.
  48. Seo JW. 2005. Fish fauna and ecological characteristics of Dark chup (Zacco temminchii) population in the Mid-Upper region of Gam Stream. Korean J. Limnol. 38:196-206.
  49. Shannon CE and W Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press. Urbana, IL. p. 233.
  50. Song SL. 1987. Salmonidae. pp. 14-15. In: Fishes in Qinling Mountain Area. Shaanxi Institute of Zoology. Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Beijing.
  51. Suarez AV and TJ Case. 2002. Bottom-up effects on persistence of a specialist predator: Ant invasions and horned lizards. Ecol. Appl. 12:291-298. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0291:BUEOPO]2.0.CO;2
  52. Wang L, J Lyons, P Kanehl and R Gatti. 1997. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22:6-12.
  53. Wang X. 2001. Integrating water-quality management and landuse planning in a watershed context. J. Environ. Manage. 61:25-36. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0395
  54. Yang JY, L Zhong and KF Wang. 2006. Biological studies and protection proposes of Brachymystax lenok in Heihe River Shaanxi Province. J. Shaxi Normal Univ. 34:67-69.
  55. Yoon HN, KD Kim, YL Jeon, JH Lee and YJ Park. 2013. Stomach contents of the manchurian trout (Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis) and river salmon (Oncorhynchus masou masou) in the Odae Mountain, Gangwondo. Korean J. Ichthyol. 25:90-105.
  56. Yoon JD and MH Jang. 2009. Migration patterns of Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis using radio tags in the upper part of the Nakdong River. Korean J. Limnol. 42:58-66.
  57. Yue PQ and YY Chen. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals, Pisces. Science Press. Beijing. pp. 107-109.
  58. Yun YJ and YI An. 2012. Length-weight relationship, condition factor (K) and von Bertalanfy's growth model of Manchurian trout (Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis) in the upper region of the Gyebang stream. MS thesis. Kangwon National University. Chuncheon, Korea. p. 16.
  59. Zhao Y and C Zhang. 2008. Threatened fishes of the world: Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis Li, 1966 (Salmonidae). pp. 11-12. In: Chinese Fishes. Springer. Dordrecht, Netherlands.