Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis of 'Function' and 'Achievement Standard' Presented in the 2015 Revised Middle School Common Curriculum and Home Economics Curriculum

2015 개정 중학교 공통 교과와 가정과 교육과정에 제시된 '기능'과 '성취기준' 비교 분석

  • Kim, Eun Kyung (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Lee, Young Sun (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Gham, Kyoung Won (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Cha, Ji Hye (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Park, Mi Jeong (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 김은경 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 이영선 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 감경원 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 차지혜 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 박미정 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2020.12.16
  • Accepted : 2021.02.10
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to derive implications for the development of the next home economics curriculum by comparing the 'function' and 'achievement standard' presented in the 14 subjects of the 2015 revised middle school common curriculum with the home economics curriculum. For this, keyword network analysis was conducted, and the results are as follows. First, in the 'function' of the 2015 revised middle school common curriculum, 'analysis, use, and expression' were found to be core function keywords with high Degree Centrality and the Eigenvector Centrality. Second, the functional keywords 'understanding, explanation, expression, analysis, and use' in the 'achievement standard' of the 2015 revised middle school common curriculum appeared with high frequency, and 'practice, problem-solving, search and reasoning' which are related to practical problem-solving ability appeared. It was confirmed that 'appreciation, solution and realization', which have relatively high Eigenvector Centrality, were core functional keywords used in the 'achievement standard'. Third, when the 'function' and 'achievement standard' of the 2015 revised middle school home economics curriculum were matched and compared, 7 out of 15 functions were not used in the statement of 'achievement standard', so the connection between 'function' and 'achievement standard' appeared to be insufficient. In addition, the diversity of functional keyword used in the 'achievement standard' was also found insufficient when compared to the middle school common curriculum. Therefore, this study propose strengthening the connectivity of 'function' and 'achievement standard' in the next home economics curriculum, using keywords such as 'analyze', 'express', 'compare', 'understand', 'interpret', 'explore', 'appreciate', and 'solve'.

본 연구의 목적은 2015 개정 중학교 공통 교육과정에 제시된 '기능'과 '성취기준'을 가정과 교육과정과 비교 분석하여 차기 가정과 교육과정 개발을 위한 시사점을 도출하는 데 있다. 이러한 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 2015 개정 중학교 가정과 교육과정을 포함한 14개 교과의 '기능'과 '성취기준'을 키워드 네트워크로 분석하였으며 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 2015 개정 중학교 공통 교육과정의 '기능'에서는 '분석, 활용, 표현'이 연결 중심성과 위세 중심성이 모두 높은 핵심적인 기능 키워드로 나타났다. 둘째, 2015 개정 중학교 공통 교육과정의 '성취기준'에서는 '이해, 설명, 표현, 분석, 활용'의 기능형 키워드가 높은 빈도로 등장했고, 실천적 문제해결 능력과 연관이 있는 '실천, 문제해결, 탐색, 추론' 등이 출현했다. 위세 중심성이 상대적으로 높은 '감상, 해결, 실현'은 '성취기준'에서 사용된 핵심적인 기능형 키워드로 확인되었다. 셋째, 2015 개정 중학교 가정과 교육과정의 '기능'과 '성취기준'의 연관성을 비교한 결과, 실과(기술·가정)의 기능 키워드 15개 중에서 7개가 가정과 '성취기준'의 기능형 키워드에 사용되지 않아 '기능'과 '성취기준'의 연계성이 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 중학교 공통 교육과정과 비교하였을 때 '성취기준'에 활용된 기능형 키워드의 다양성도 부족한 것으로 평가되었다. 이에 차기 가정과 교육과정에서 '기능'과 '성취기준'의 연계성 강화와 '분석, 표현, 비교, 이해, 해석, 탐구, 감상, 해결' 등의 다양한 기능(형) 키워드 활용을 제안한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 한국교원대학교 2020년 국립대학 육성사업 교육연구프로그램(ERP)의 지원을 받아 연구되었음.

References

  1. Choi, S. J. (2016). 커뮤니케이션 연구를 위한 네트워크 분석 [Network analysis for communication research]. Seoul: Communication Books.
  2. Gham, K. W., & Park, M. J. (2020). Analysis of research trends in home economics education by language network analysis: Focused on the KCI journals (2000-2019). Journal of the Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(3), 179-197. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2020.09.32.3.179
  3. Heo, G. C. (2005). A study on the follow up support for the substantiation of school education (III): A study on the improvement of the national curriculum application process for the substantial school education (Research Report RRC 2005-2-1). Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.
  4. Jeon, S. K. (2016). A review on achievement standards and explanations of achievement standards in the 2015 revised practical arts curriculum 'home life'. Proceedings of the 2015 Winter The Korean Practical Arts Education Conference (pp. 1-19). Cheongju: The Korean Association of Practical Arts Education.
  5. Kim, B. M., & Kim, Y. M. (2019). Analysis of the relationship between achievement standards and subject competencies of the 2015 revised Mathematics curriculum: Focusing on content system 'skill'. Learner Centered Curriculum Education Research, 19(18), 845-873. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.18.845
  6. Kwahk, K.-Y. (2017). 소셜 네트워크 분석 [Social network analysis]. Seoul: Chungram.
  7. Kwon, M. H., & Park, J. S. (2020). Critical review of 'skills' in the 2015 revised science national curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.2.151
  8. Lee, K. H., Lee, K. W., Park, J. M., & Park, M. J. (2013). A study on the restructure of curriculum focused on core competency (Research Report RRC 2013-17). Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.
  9. Lee, K. W., & Jeung, Y. K. (2017). A reflective review on constitution of content system in 2015 revised subject curriculum: Focused on key concept, generalized knowledge, and skill. Learner Centered Curriculum Education Research, 17(16), 597-622. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.16.597
  10. Lee, M. K. (2016). A study on the development direction of competency based curriculum for the 21st century: OECD education 2030 (Research Report RRC 2016-5). Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.
  11. Lee, S.-S. (2012). 네트워크 분석 방법론 [Network analysis methodology]. Seoul: Nonhyung.
  12. Lee, S.-S. (2018). 네트워크 분석방법의 활용과 한계 [Network analysis methods application and limitations]. Seoul: Chungram.
  13. Lim, Y. J., & Park, M. J. (2019). A study on the definition of skills and subelements of practical arts(technology.home economics) in the revised curriculum in 2015. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 32(1), 141-162. doi:10.24062/kpae.2019.32.1.141
  14. Lim, Y. N., & Jang, S. Y. (2016). An analysis on the relationship between key competencies and subjects of the 2015 revised national curriculum: Using semantic network analysis. Learner Centered Curriculum Education Research, 16(10), 749-771. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.10.749
  15. Ministry of Education. (2015a). 초.중등학교 교육과정 총론 [The national guidelines for the elementary and secondary curriculum] (Notice No. 2015-74, Separate 1). Sejong: Author.
  16. Ministry of Education. (2015b). 실과(기술.가정)/정보과 교육과정 [Practical Arts(Technology.Home Economics)/Information Curriculum] (Notice No. 2015-74, Separate 10). Sejong: Author.
  17. Ministry of Education. (2017). 2015 개정 교육과정 총론 해설 중학교 [Commentary of the national guidelines for 2015 revised curriculum middle school]. Sejong: Author.
  18. Ministry of Education. (2018). A study on the analysis and improvement of the contents system of curriculum. Sejong: Author.
  19. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2009). 초.중등학교 교육과정 총론 [The national guidelines for the elementary and secondary curriculum] (Notice No. 2009-41, Separate 1). Seoul: Author.
  20. Park, M. J., & Han, J. (2020). Research trend analysis for North Korea education research using keyword network analysis. Learner Centered Curriculum Education Research, 20(11), 185-213. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.11.185
  21. Park, Y. J. (2016). A study of 'skill' in the 2015 revised elementary moral education curriculum: Critical understanding. Teacher Education, 32(3), 127-145. doi:10.14333/KJTE.2016.32.3.127
  22. Yang, J. S., & Lee, G. S. (2018). Analysis of knowledge and competency for the fourth industrial revolution based on Anderson's revision of Bloom's taxonomy: Focused on achievement standard in the 2015 revised practical arts(technology.home economics). Journal of the Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(3), 129-149. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2018.09.30.3.129