Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Needs Assessment of Middle School Students for Practical Reasoning Home Economics Classes in the Distance Learning Environment

원격학습 환경에서 가정교과 실천적 추론 과정에 대한 중학생의 요구도 조사연구

  • Received : 2020.10.13
  • Accepted : 2021.01.18
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the needs of middle school students for the practical reasoning in a distance learning environment, to verify the needs differences based on the learner's personal characteristics, student-teacher interaction, and student-student interaction, and to investigate the relationships among student-teacher interaction, voluntary participation of students, and the students' perception of the extent to which practical reasoning is implemented in distance learning. For this purpose, 1,842 middle school students from seven schools in Gyeonggi, Daejeon, Chungbuk, and Sejong areas were surveyed online to investigate the importance of the practical reasoning questions and the how much practical reasoning is implemented in current distance learning. Among them, 1,095 responses were used for final analysis and descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and path analysis were conducted. As a result of the study, first, middle school students acknowledged that the practical reasoning was important with the importance average 3.76. Based on the locus for focus model, the priorities of the needs in home economics class were examined, and the values and importance of the problem, and the ramification of the solution were considered to be of high priority. Second, characteristics of middle school students, student-teacher interaction and student-student interaction were found to have positive influence on needs for practical reasoning, while no difference were found by gender or voluntary participation in distance learning. Third, the voluntary participation of students and the student-teacher interaction in distance learning had a positive (+) significant effect on perceived implementation of practical reasoning, yet negative (-) significant effect on needs for practical reasoning.

본 연구의 목적은 원격학습 환경에서 실천적 추론 과정에 대한 중학생의 요구도를 조사하고, 학습자의 개인적 특성과 교사 상호작용, 학생 간 상호작용에 따라 요구도의 차이를 검증하며, 교사와의 상호작용, 학습자의 자발적 참여도, 실천적 추론 과정에 대한 반영도와의 관계를 알아보는 것이다. 이를 위해 경기, 대전, 충북, 세종 등 7개 학교의 중학생 1,842명을 대상으로 하여 실천적 추론 과정의 질문 내용에 대한 중요도와 현재 원격수업의 반영도를 온라인으로 설문 조사하였다. 이 중 1,095명이 답한 결과로 요구도를 산출하고, 기술통계, 독립표본 t-검정, 일원배치 분산분석, 경로분석을 하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 원격학습 환경에서 가정교과의 실천적 추론 과정에 대해 중학생들은 중요도 평균이 3.76으로 실천적 추론 과정이 중요하다고 인식하였다. 가정교과 원격수업에서 요구도의 우선순위를 The locus for focus 모델로 확인한 결과, 문제의 가치와 중요성, 문제의 상황과 관련된 고정관념, 해결방안의 파급효과, 정보의 신뢰성, 실천을 어렵게 하는 요소의 극복 방안, 실천내용을 반성하게 하는 질문이 우선적으로 고려되어야 하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 중학생의 개인적 특성, 교사와의 상호작용, 학생 간 상호작용에 따라 요구도에 차이가 있는지 검증한 결과, 성별, 원격수업의 자발적 참여도에 따라서 유의한 차이가 없었다. 반면에 교사와의 상호작용, 학생 간의 상호작용은 실천적 추론 과정의 요구도에 유의한 차이를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 원격학습 환경에서 학생의 자발적 참여도와 교사와의 상호작용은 반영도에 정(+)적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었고, 반영도는 요구도에 부(-)적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 원격학습 환경에서 실천적 추론 수업을 실행할 때 비판적 질문을 통해서 학습자로 하여금 행동을 반성하고 깨달음을 얻을 수 있는 질문을 우선적으로 고려할 필요가 있다. 또한, 교사, 학생 간의 상호작용과 학생의 자발적 참여도를 높이기 위한 방안을 탐색하여 실행할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J. Y., Shim, H. S., & Chae, J. H. (2018). The effects of practical problem-based home economics classes on middle school students' creativity. Proceedings of the 2018 Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference (pp. 145-146). Seoul.
  2. Baek, M. K. (2019). A case study of flipped learning applied to a college-level course on the culture of family living and its effect. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 31(1), 77-88. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2019.03.31.1.77
  3. Byun, H. J., & Chae, J. H. (2002). Focusing on family relations and resource management: the effect of practical reasoning instruction in Home Economics on the critical thinking. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 14(3), 1-9.
  4. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home Economics: a definition. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.
  5. Chae, J. H. (1999). The effects of practical reasoning instruction in home economics and other factors on Korean high shcool female students' decision making skills. Family and Environment Research, 37(3), 43-61.
  6. Chae, J. H., Yoo, T. M., Park, M. J., & Lee, J. Y. (2003). The effect of practical reasoning Home Economics instruction on morality of middle school students. Family and Environment Research, 41(12), 53-68.
  7. Choi, S. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2020). A comparative study on Korean and American high school home economics textbooks based on Habermas's three systems of action: focusing on the learning objectives and activities. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association. 32(1), 107-125. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2020.03.32.1.107
  8. Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests. (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Malden, MA: Polity Press. (Original work published 1968).
  9. Han, S. J., Kim, H. W., & Heo, G. (2014). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of smart-learning. Journal of Ffisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 26(1), 148-155. doi:10.13000/JFMSE.2014.26.1.148
  10. Heo, G. (2014). A study on the structural equation modeling for the effect of e-learning. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 15(6), 77-84. doi:10.7472/jksii.2014.15.6.77
  11. Im, J. H., & Jung, I. S. (1999). A study on the student satisfaction of web-based instruction. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 5(2), 151-175.
  12. Indigo seowon. (2020). 공부는 정의로 나아가는 문이다: 코로나 시대, 새로운 교육을 위하여 [Study is the door to justice: Corona era, for new education]. Paju: Kungree.
  13. Jeong, B. H., & Son, W. K. (2008). The effect of e-learning application to the unit of making short trousers in technology-home economics of middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 20(2), 1-14.
  14. Jung, W. J. (2013). A Study on the Awareness of Learners about University e-Learning and their Needs. Unpublished master's thesis, Gyeongsang National University, Gyeongnam, Korea.
  15. Kim, P. S. (2018). Middle and high school students' satisfaction and demand toward flipped learning at private tutoring centers. The Journal of Future Education, 8(2), 111-138.
  16. Kim, S. H. (2005). A study on the relationship with e-learning characteristics, customer' satisfaction, and repurchase intention: focusing on the mediating and moderating effects of individual characteristics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyonggi University, Su won, Korea.
  17. Korean Educational Psychology Association. (2000). 교육심리학용 어사전[Educational psychological terminology dictionary]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  18. Laster, J. F. (1982). A practical action teaching model. Journal of Home Economics, 74(3), 41-44.
  19. Lee, G. M., & Lee, H. J. (2004). A study on the needs of middle school students for technology and home economics subjects according to technical, interpretative and emancipative action system: focused on the units of clothing and management. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference (pp. 145-146). Seoul.
  20. Lee, J. H., & Chae, J. H. (2008). Development of practical problem-based Home Economics teaching.learning process plans by blended learning strategy: focusing on a unit 'the youth and consumer life'. Journal of Korea Home Economics Education Association, 20(4), 19-42.
  21. Lee, H. C., & Goo, B. H. (2009). The effects of e-learning characteristics on e-learner's scholastic performance. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 14(5), 201-209.
  22. Lee, S. C., & Kim, J. A. (2018). Factors that affect student satisfaction with online courses. The Journal of Educational Adinistration, 36(2), 115-138.
  23. Lee, S. H., Choi, H. S., & Chae, Y. J. (2018). Exploring a learning experience model of middle and high school students in an online learning environment using electronic textbook. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 24(2), 331-361. doi:10.15833/KAFEIAM.24.2.331
  24. Lee, S. H. (2004). 교육과정 개발의 원리[Principle of curriculum development]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  25. Lee, W. K., & Lee, J. K. (2004). The effects of self-efficacy, perception of learning quality and attitude toward learning management system on virtual lecture satisfaction. Proceedings of the 2004 Summer Korea Society of Management information Systems Conference (pp. 1-8). Seoul.
  26. Min, H. L., Seo, Y. K., Yoon, H. J., Lee, S. H., & Kim, K. L. (2020). 온라인 수업.강의[Online class, lecture A2Z]. Seoul: Academic trial.
  27. Ministry of Education. (2020). 처음으로 초.중.고.특 신학기 온라인 개학 실시 [First, online school opening for elementary, middle, high and special new semesters]. Press release. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=80160&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  28. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. (2014). 2012~2103 이러닝 백서[2012~2013 e-Learning white paper]. Seoul: Jinhan M&B.
  29. Moon, S. H., & Chae, J. H. (2001). The effects of practical reasoning Home Economics instruction applied to food & nutrition units on female high school students' morality. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 13(3), 119-130.
  30. Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54, 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
  31. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning evironment: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250989
  32. Reid, W. A. (1979). Practical reasoning and curriculum theory: In search of a new paradigm. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(3), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.2307/3202120
  33. Ryu, I., Kim, J. J., & Cho, Y. M. (2003). Effectiveness of web-based on-line corporate education: The case of 'L' company. Information Systems Review, 5(1), 33-48.
  34. Shin, H. W. (2018). Case study of flipped learning applied to hand sewing class in home economics education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(4), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.12.30.4.127
  35. Shin, H. W., & Kim, H. R. (2018). 플립 러닝을 활용한 서양복식사 수업 사례 및 효과[Cases and effects of western costume history class using flip learning]. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference (pp. 143). Seoul.
  36. Shin, S. B., & Han, H. J. (2008). The effect of teaching activity on the change of the learning attitude and cognition in e-learning. Journal of Learning curriculum and instruction, 8(2), 231-249.
  37. Song, Y. O. (2020). Analysis of university freshmen's perception of computational thinking using Borich needs and the Locus for Focus model. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(12), 437-457. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.12.437
  38. Song, Y. S., & Lee, K. H. (2015). The effects of 'AKC(Australia-Korea Connection) as distance collaborative learning focused on fostering creativity of elementary school students in South Korea and Australia. Journal of Global Creative Leader, 5(1), 85-103.
  39. Yoo, N. S., & Kim, Y. N. (1997). Teachers' needs assessment on food/nutrition of secondary Home Economics education for three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 9(1), 83-94.
  40. Yoo, T. M., & Lee, H. S. (2009). Effects of practical reasoning instruction on problem solving ability. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(2), 203-215.
  41. Yoo, T. M., & Lee, S. H. (2011). 실천적 문제 중심 가정과 수업 [Problem-based instruction of Home Economics]. Seoul: Bookkorea.
  42. Yoo, P. J. (2003). Comments on the components of e-learning evaluation and evaluation criteria. The Journal of Training and Development, 9, 73-94.