Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Safety Culture: A Retrospective Analysis of Occupational Health and Safety Mining Reports

  • Tetzlaff, Emily J. (Centre for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University) ;
  • Goggins, Katie A. (Centre for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University) ;
  • Pegoraro, Ann L. (Centre for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University) ;
  • Dorman, Sandra C. (Centre for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University) ;
  • Pakalnis, Vic (Radiation Safety Institute of Canada) ;
  • Eger, Tammy R. (Centre for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University)
  • Received : 2020.07.13
  • Accepted : 2020.12.05
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: In the mining industry, various methods of accident analysis have utilized official accident investigations to try and establish broader causation mechanisms. An emerging area of interest is identifying the extent to which cultural influences, such as safety culture, are acting as drivers in the reoccurrence of accidents. Thus, the overall objective of this study was to analyze occupational health and safety (OHS) reports in mining to investigate if/how safety culture has historically been framed in the mining industry, as it relates to accident causation. Methods: Using a computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software, 34 definitions of safety culture were analyzed to highlight key terms. Based on word count and contextual relevance, 26 key terms were captured. Ten OHS reports were then analyzed via an inductive thematic analysis, using the key terms. This analysis provided a concept map representing the 50-year data set and facilitated the use of text framing to highlight safety culture in the selected OHS mining reports. Results: Overall, 954 references and six themes, safety culture, attitude, competence, belief, patterns, and norms, were identified in the data set. Of the 26 key terms originally identified, 24 of them were captured within the text. The results made evident two distinct frames in which to interpret the data: the role of the individual and the role of the organization, in safety culture. Conclusion: Unless efforts are made to understand and alter cultural drivers and share these findings within and across industries, the same accidents are likely to continue to occur.

Keywords

References

  1. ILO. Economic and social sectors: energy and mining. International Labour Organization. 2020. Available from: www.ilo.org.
  2. Turner BA. Man-made disasters. London, United Kingdom: Wykeham Publications; 1978.
  3. Braithwaite J. To punish or persuade: enforcement of coal mine safety. Albany, USA: State University of New York Press; 1985.
  4. Hopkins A. A culture of denial: sociological similarities between the Moura and Gretley mine disasters. J Occup Health Saf 2000;16(1):29-36.
  5. Quinlan M. Ten pathways to death and disaster: learning from fatal incidents in mines and other high hazard workplaces. Sydney, Australia: The Federation Press; 2014.
  6. Dekker SWA. The psychology of accident investigation: epistemological, preventive, moral and existential meaning-making. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2015;16:202-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2014.955554
  7. HSC) HaSC. ACSNI study group on human factors. London, UK: Organizing for Safety; 1993.
  8. Cooper MD. Towards a model of safety culture. J Saf Sci 2000;36:111-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7
  9. Abdelhamid TS, Everett JG. Identifying root causes of construction accidents. J Construct Eng Manag 2000;126(1):52-60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:1(52)
  10. ILO. Chernobyl 20 years after: from disaster, breeding a new safety culture. International Labour Organization. 2016. Available from: www.ilo.org.
  11. Cullen WD. The public inquiry into the piper Alpha disaster. London, UK: H.M.S.O.; 1990.
  12. Baker JA, Erwin G, Priest S, Tebo PV, Rosenthal I, Bowman FL, et al. The report of the B.P. US refineries independent safety review panel. The B.P. US Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel; 2007.
  13. Magnus R, The CI, Lau JM. Report of the committee of inquiry into the incident at the MRT circle line worksite that led to the collapse of the nicoll highway on 20 April 204. Singapore: Subordinate Courts; 2005.
  14. Sheen J. MV herald of free enterprise: report of court No. 8074 formal investigation. London, UK: Department of Transport; 1987.
  15. Goh YM, Bornw H, Spickett J. Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety culture. J Saf Sci 2010;48:302-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.006
  16. DeJoy DM, Murphy LR, Gershon RRM. The influence of employee, job/task, and organizational factors on adherence to universal precautions among nurses. Int J Ind Ergon 1995;16:43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00075-E
  17. Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol 2000;3:347-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  18. Mattila M, Hyttinen M, Rantanen E. Effective supervisory behaviour and safety at the building site. Int J Ind Ergon 1994;13:85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)90075-2
  19. Cheyne A, Cox S, Oliver A, Tomas JM. Modelling safety climate in the prediction of levels of safety activity. J Work Stress 1998;12(3):255-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379808256865
  20. Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 1980;65:96-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
  21. Dedobbeleer N, Beland F. A safety climate measure for construction sites. J Saf Res 1991;22:97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(91)90017-P
  22. Gillen M, Baltz D, Gassel M, Kirsch L, Vaccaro D. Perceived safety climate, job demands, and coworker support among union and nonunion injured construction workers. J Saf Res 2002;33(1):33-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00002-6
  23. Tetzlaff E, Pegoraro A, Pakalnis V, Eger T. Thematic analysis of key recommendations from commissioned occupational Health and Safety Reports in mining. Sudbury, Ontario: Laurentian University; 2017.
  24. Shirali GA, Shekari M, Angali KA. Qualitative assessment of resilience safety culture using principal components analysis and numerical taxonomy: a case study in a petrochemical plant. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2016;40:277-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.01.007
  25. Vaughan D. The challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
  26. Antonsen S. Safety culture and the issue of power. J Saf Sci 2009;47:183-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.02.004
  27. NTSB. National transportation safety board. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board; 2013.
  28. Strauch B. Can we examine safety culture in accident investigations, or should we? J Saf Sci 2015;77:102-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.020
  29. Tetzlaff E, Pegorago A, Dorman S, Pakalnis V, Eger T. Analysis of recommendations from mining incident investigative reports: a 50-year review. Safety 2019;6(3):15.
  30. Prasser S. Royal Commissions in Australia: when should governments appoint them? Aust J Public Adm 2006;65(3):28-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2006.00492a.x
  31. Davies SHE. Report of the tribunal appointed to inquire into the disaster at Aberfan on October 21st 1966. 1 ed. London, United Kingdom: Her Majesty's Stationary Office; 1967.
  32. Ham JM. Royal commission on the health and safety of workers in mines. Toronto, Canada: Ministry of the Attorney General; 1976.
  33. Burkett KM, Riggin RP, Rothney KE. Towards safe production: joint federalprovincial inquiry commission into safety in mines and mining plants in Ontario. Ontario, Canada: Government of Canada; 1981.
  34. Stevenson T, Campbell B, Curtis P, Briggs R, Guillet S, Bharti S, et al. Improving ground stability and mine rescue: the report of the provincial inquiry into ground control and emergency preparedness in Ontario mines. Ontario, CAN: Ontario Government Bookstore; 1986.
  35. Windridge FW, Parkin RJ, Neilson PJ, Roxborough FF, Ellicott CW. Report on an accident at Moura No. 2 underground mine on Sunday, 7 August 1994. Moura District, Australia: Australian Government; 1996.
  36. Richard KP. The Westray story: a predictable Path to disaster: report of the Westray mine public inquiry. Nova Scotia, CAN: Lieutenant Governor in Council; 1997.
  37. Roberts CE, Kane DJ. The Sago mine disaster. West Virginia, USA: United Mine Workers of America; 2006.
  38. Beall K, Beck JA, McGinley PC, Monforton C, Roberts DC, Spence B, et al. Upper big branch: the April 5, 2010 explosion: a failure of basic coal mine safety practices: report to the governor of West Virginia. Charleston, USA: Diane Publishing; 2011. 122 p.
  39. Panckhurst G, Bell S, Henry D. The royal commission on the pike river coal mine tragedy. Wellington, New Zealand: Governor General of New Zealand; 2012.
  40. Government O. Mining health, safety and prevention review. Ontario, Canada: Ministry of Labour; 2015.
  41. Leximancer. Leximancer manual (version 4). 4.0 ed; 2014.
  42. Yin RK. Case study research design and methods. Sage; 2009.
  43. Entman R. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 1993;43(4):51-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  44. Goffman E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Boston, USA: Northeastern University Press; 1974.
  45. Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
  46. Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. J Saf Sci 2000;34:215-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X
  47. Atkinson PE. Creating culture change: the key to successful total quality management. USA: Kempston; 1990.
  48. Seddon J. A passion for quality. The TQM Magazine 1989:153-7.
  49. Davies GF, Powell WW. Organization - environment relations. In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM, editors. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 1992. p. 315-75.
  50. Clarke SG. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. J Occup Health Psychol 2006;11:315-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315
  51. Marsick VJ, Watkins KE. Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. J Adv Dev Hum Resour 2003;5(2):132-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002
  52. Organizations HIfLi. Strategic organizational learning: how innovative companies use learning to address business challenges (Report to participating companies). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University; 2002.
  53. Hemingway MA, Smith CS. Organizational climate and occupational stressors as predictors of withdrawal behaviours and injuries in nurses. J Occup Org Psychol 1999;72:285-99. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166680
  54. Goldenhar LM, Williams LJ, Swanson NG. Modelling relationships between job stressors and injury and near-miss outcomes for construction labourers. J Work Stress 2003;17(3):218-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370310001616144
  55. Neal A, Griffin MA. Safety climate and safety behaviour. Aust J Manage 2002;(Special Issue):67-75.
  56. DeJoy D. Behaviour change versus culture change: divergent approaches to management workplace safety. J Saf Sci 2005;43(2):105-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.02.001
  57. Flin R, Mearns K, O'Connor P, Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. J Saf Sci 2000;34:177-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6
  58. Mohamed S. Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction. J Construct Eng Manage 2003;129(1):80-8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(80)
  59. Choudhry R, Fang D, Mohamed S. The nature of safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art. J Saf Sci 2007;45(10):993-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.09.003
  60. Mearns K, Flin R, Gordon R, Fleming M. Human and organizational factors in offshore safety. J Work Stress 2001;15:144-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783701102678370110066616
  61. Hopkins A. Safety culture, mindfulness and safe behaviour: converging ideas?; 2002.
  62. Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol 2006;91:946-53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
  63. Pidgeon NF. The limits to safety? Culture, politics, learning and man-made disasters. J Contingencies and Crisis Manag 1997;5:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.00032
  64. Kim Y, Park J, Park M. Creating a culture of prevention in occupational safety and health practice. J Saf Health Work 2016;7:89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.02.002
  65. Mento A, Jones R, Dirndorfer W. A change management process: grounded in both theory and practice. J Change Manag 2002;3(1):45-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/714042520
  66. Vuorio A, Rantonen J, Johnson C, Ollila T, Salminen S, et al. What fatal occupational accident investigators can learn from fatal aircraft accident investigations. J Saf Sci 2013;62:366-9.
  67. Lind S, Kivisto-Rahnasto J. Utilization of external accident information in companies' safety promotion - case: Finnish metal and transportation industry. J Saf Sci 2008;46:802-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.01.009

Cited by

  1. An Integrated Entropy Weight and Grey Clustering Method-Based Evaluation to Improve Safety in Mines vol.38, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00444-5
  2. Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer? vol.147, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623