DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Essence Of Pedagogical Technologies In Modern Education

  • Korets, Mykola (scientific-pedagogical and administrative-economic work, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University) ;
  • Popova, Alla (Department of Music Private Institution of Higher Education, "Kyiv University of Culture") ;
  • Sinenko, Oksana (Department of Music Private Institution of Higher Education, "Kyiv University of Culture") ;
  • Trynko, Olga (Department of Music Private Institution of Higher Education, "Kyiv University of Culture") ;
  • Karolop, Olena (Department of hotel and restaurant and tourist business, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Krasovskyi, Serhii (Department of hotel and restaurant and tourist business, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts)
  • Received : 2021.04.05
  • Published : 2021.05.30

Abstract

The article discusses the use of modern technologies in the learning process. It has been determined that the modern period of the development of society is characterized by a strong influence of computer technologies on it, a new education system is being formed, focused on entering the world information and educational space. This process is accompanied by significant changes in the pedagogical theory and practice of the educational process associated with making adjustments to the content of learning technologies, which should be adequate to modern technical capabilities, and contribute to the harmonious entry of a teenager into the information society. Computer technologies are designed to become not an additional "makeweight" in training, but an integral part of a holistic educational process, significantly increasing its effectiveness

Keywords

References

  1. International Yearbook of Education And Instructional Technology, 1978/1979. - L., N.Y., 1978. - P. 258.
  2. Popham W., Baker E. Systematic Instruction Englewood Cliffs, 1970; Romiszowski A. Designing Instructional Systems. - L., N.Y., 1981.
  3. Meera N. S. Quality education for all? A case study of a New Delhi government school, Policy futures in education, 2015, No 13 (3), pp. 360-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315569042
  4. Sosenski S. Financial Education for Children: School Savings Programs in Mexico (1925-1945), Historia Mexicana, 2014, No 64 (2), pp. 645 - 662.
  5. Alfred P. Rovai, Linda D. Grooms The relationship of personalitybased learning style preferences and learning among online graduate students // Journal of Computing in Higher Education. - 2004. - No16, Issue 1. - pp 30- 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960281
  6. http://pssh1.narod.ru/karta.htm
  7. Chad D. Ellett, Karen S. Loup, RIta R. Culross, Joanne H. McMullen, John K. Rugutt. Assessing Enhancement of Learning, Personal Learning Environment, and Student Efficacy: Alternatives to Traditional Faculty Evaluation in Higher Education // Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. - 1997. - No11, Issue 2. - pp. 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007989320210
  8. McMillan R. Man Builds Twitter Bot That Humans Actually Like. Wired. URL: wired.com/2012/06/twitter_arm/
  9. Ktepi B. Deception in political social media // ed. K. Harvey. Encyclopedia of social media and politic. Vol. 4. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. P. 357-359.
  10. Kotler P., Lee N. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005.
  11. Rampton S ., Stauber . J . Trust us! We're experts: How industry manipulates science and gambles with your future . Tarcher. 2002.
  12. Dordick H.S., Wang G. The Information Society: A Retrospective View. Newbury Park - L., - 1993.