International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determinants of Writing Research According to International Standards in Web of Science Journals

  • Received : 2021.03.05
  • Published : 2021.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study aimed to define all the main determinants of writing a research paper in an integrated manner within the requirements of the science network journals, by introducing scientific research and the steps of writing a research paper, starting from choosing the title to writing the abstract, identifying the research problem, questions, importance and objectives of the study, how to choose previous studies, research methodology and tools, discussion and results In addition to determining the acceptable percentage of plagiarism for science network journals, recommendations, choosing appropriate references and choosing the appropriate references, in addition to determining the acceptable percentage of plagiarism for the journals of the Network of Science, the researcher used the method of analytical investigative research to find out the axes of the study and analyze different reference citation methods to deal with different sources of information (articles-books-theses-conference works-reviews), In addition to studying the most important international programs for measuring plagiarism ratios that are accredited within the journals of the Science Network, and the study concluded that the researcher must present original and innovative results, add an integrated and logical work, take into account all the scientific conditions in the design of the research, its steps and ethics, and take into account the international standards in citing Reference, taking into account the rates of plagiarism within Web of Science journals.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the approval and the support of this research study by grant no. 8462-EAR-2019-1-10 from the Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, K.S.A.

References

  1. Lu, Congcong; Zhang, Yonghe; Zhou, Chunhui; Jiao, Jianbin; Wu, Yirong, Methods, and Practice of Graduate Education System with the Integration of Scientific Research and Education, Research in Higher Education Journal, 37 (2019).
  2. Montes-Rodriguez, Ramon; Martinez-Rodriguez, Juan Bautista; Ocana-Fernandez, Almudena, Case Study as a Research Method for Analyzing MOOCs: Presence and Characteristics of Those Case Studies in the Main Scientific Databases, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3) (2019) 59-79.
  3. Akyurek, Erkan; Afacan, Ozlem, Problems Encountered during the Scientific Research Process in Graduate Education: The Institute of Educational Sciences, Higher Education Studies, 8(2) (2018) 47-57. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v8n2p47
  4. Tuncer, Murat; Bahadir, Ferdi, Relationships between Success Orientation, Self Efficacy on Scientific Research and Metacognitive Thinking Skills, Online Submission, European Journal of Education Studies, 4(10) (2018) 49-64.
  5. Landry, Robert J., III, Empirical Scientific Research and Legal Studies Research--A Missing Link, Journal of Legal Studies Education, 33(1) (2016) 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlse.12038
  6. Da Silva, Alexsandro Almeida, Interactive Art, Performance and Scientific Research into Corporeal Empathy, Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 6(1) (2018) 39-54.
  7. Burnette, Margaret, the "Research Audit" Model: A Prototype for Data-Driven Discovery of Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(4) (2015) 645-659. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2015.0052
  8. Nathan, Robert Jeyakumar; Shawkataly, Omar Bin, Publications, Citations and Impact Factors, Australian Universities' Review, 61(1) (2019) 42-48.
  9. Boysen, Guy A., An Evaluation of Production versus Error-Recognition Techniques for Teaching APA-Style Citations and References, Teaching of Psychology, 46(4) (2019) 328-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319872609
  10. Walker, Janice R.; Kelly, Erin E., Trying to Contain Ourselves: A Dialogic Review of the "MLA Handbook, Eighth Edition", Composition Forum, 35 (2017).
  11. Weinraub, Jennifer Yao, Harder to Find than Nemo: The Elusive Image Citation Standard, College & Research Libraries, 79 (4) 480-498 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.4.480
  12. Baykoucheva, Svetla; Houck, Joseph D.; White, Natalia, Integration of Endnote Online in Information Literacy Instruction Designed for Small and Large Chemistry Courses, Journal of Chemical Education, 93(3) (2016) 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00515
  13. Akbari, Alireza, Spinning-Translation and the Act of Plagiarising: How to Avoid and Resist, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(1) (2021) 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1709629
  14. Liles, Lee-Ann A., Plagiarism in Higher Education, Voices in Education, 5(29-32) (2019).
  15. Balbay, Seher; Kilis, Selcan, Perceived Effectiveness of Turnitin® in Detecting Plagiarism in Presentation Slides, Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1) (2019) 25-36. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512522
  16. Martinez, Salvador; Wimmer, Manuel; Cabot, Jordi, Efficient Plagiarism Detection for Software Modeling Assignments, Computer Science Education, 30(2) (2010) 187-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1711495
  17. Bethany, Reine, The Plagiarism Polyconundrum, Journal of International Students, 6(4), (2016) 1045-1052. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v6i4.334