DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Matrix Material Particle Size on Mullite Whisker Growth

  • Hwang, Jinsung (Department of Materials Engineering Graduate School, Keimyung University) ;
  • Choe, Songyul (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University)
  • Received : 2021.02.26
  • Accepted : 2021.05.11
  • Published : 2021.06.27

Abstract

Understanding of effects of changes in the particle size of the matrix material on the mullite whisker growth during the production of porous mullite is crucial for better design of new porous ceramics materials in different applications. Commercially, raw materials such as Al2O3/SiO2 and Al(OH)3/SiO2 are used as starting materials, while AlF3 is added to fabricate porous mullite through reaction sintering process. When Al2O3 is used as a starting material, a porous microstructure can be identified, but a more developed needle shaped microstructure is identified in the specimen using Al(OH)3, which has excellent reactivity. The specimen using Al2O3/SiO2 composite powder does not undergo mulliteization even at 1,400 ℃, but the specimen using the Al(OH)3/SiO2 composite powder had already formed complete mullite whiskers from the particle size specimen milled for 3 h at 1,100 ℃. As a result, the change in sintering temperature does not significantly affect formation of microstructures. As the particle size of the matrix materials, Al2O3 and Al(OH)3, decreases, the porosity tends to decrease. In the case of the Al(OH)3/SiO2 composite powder, the highest porosity obtained is 75 % when the particle size passes through a milling time of 3 h. The smaller the particle size of Al(OH)3 is and the more the long/short ratio of the mullite whisker phase decreases, the higher the density becomes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy) in Korea, under the Fostering Global Talents for Innovative Growth Program (P0008751) supervised by the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT).

References

  1. J. H. Eom, S. H. Chae and Y. U. Kim, Ceramist, 10, 14 (2007).
  2. S. Kangak, H. Tabata, T. Kumagawaand and S. Hota, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 68, C-6 (1985).
  3. I. Aksay and D. M. Sarikaya, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74, 2343 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06768.x
  4. W. E. Lee and W. M. Rainforth, Ceramic Microstructures: Property Control by Processing, p.305, Chapman & Hall, London (1994).
  5. T. Koyama, S. Hayashi, A. Yasumori, K. Okada, M. Schmucker and H. Schneider, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 16, 231 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-2219(95)00142-5
  6. K. Okada and N. Otsuka, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 8, 1052 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730484
  7. D. A. Haught and I. G. Talmy, U. S. Pat. no. 4910172 (1990).
  8. D. A. Haught and I. G. Talmy, D. Divecha and S. Karmarkar, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 144, 207 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(91)90226-D
  9. K. Okada and N. Otsuka, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74, 2414 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06778.x