DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교과중심 교육과정에서의 정보영역 교육과정 구성 방향

Information Domain Curriculum Composition Direction in Subject-Centered Curriculum

  • 투고 : 2021.03.28
  • 심사 : 2021.04.05
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30

초록

이 연구는 국내의 교과중심 교육과정체제에서 정보영역 교육과정을 어떻게 구성해야 하는지에 대한 방향성에 대한 것이다. 이를 위해 교과중심과 역량중심 교육과정을 비교 분석하였으며 2개의 유형에서 정보영역이 어떻게 편제되어 있는지를 제시하였다. 국내 교육과정은 역량을 강조하지만 국가수준의 교육목표 제시, 교과학습모형, 교과서 등을 강조하고 있어서 교과중심 교육과정에 치우친 형태로 판단하였다. 정보영역 교과중심 교육과정 사례로 초등 실과과의 정보영역, 중학교 정보교과를 제시하였으며 SW융합교육과정은 진보적인 교육과정 사례로 제시하였다. 이와 같은 여건에서 SW AI 내용을 포함하는 정보영역을 통해 학습자가 미래 지능형사회에서 주도적인 생활을 하기 위해서는 컴퓨터과학을 모학문으로 하여 교과중심 관점으로 명시적으로 기술되어야 함을 강조하였다.

This study is about the direction of how to compose the information domain curriculum in the domestic subject matter centered curriculum system. To this end, subject-centered and competency-centered curriculum were compared and analyzed, and how the information domain was organized in two types was suggested. In spite of emphasizing competency, the domestic curriculum was judged to be inclined to the subject-centered curriculum because it emphasized the presentation of national-level educational goals, a subject learning model, and textbooks. As examples of the information domain subject-centered curriculum, the information domain of the elementary practical subject and the middle school information curriculum were presented, and the SW convergence curriculum was presented as an example of a progressive curriculum. Under such circumstances, it was emphasized that in order for the learner to lead a life in an intelligent society in the future through the information domain including SWAI content, it must be explicitly described in a subject-centered perspective with computer science as the parent study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi Soo-jin 5others(2017). A study on OECD Education 2030 project: Analyzing validity of OECD competencies framework and exploring practices of competency-based education in South Korea. Korean Educational Development Institude. Research report RR 2017-18.
  2. Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs,2019 -2020 https://www.abet.org
  3. Deok-Ho Jang(2017). An Exploratory Study for the Direction and Tasks for Innovating School System in the Intelligent Information Society. Journal of Digital Convergence 15(12).
  4. Jamie Knowles(2019). Teachers' Essential Guide to Coding in the Classroom Common Sense Education. https://www.commonsense.org/
  5. Jang Yerum(2020). A Study on the Improvement of Information Education Operation Methods for Improving Computational Thinking : Focusing on the Comparison of Overseas Information Subject Curriculum. Kunguk Univ. Graduate School
  6. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity(2020). Elementary School Mathematics Subject 4th class second periods.
  7. Korea Natl. Univ. of Education(2020). Elementary School Korean Subject 6th class second periods.
  8. K-12 Computer Science Framework. (2016). http://www.k12cs.org.
  9. Kwon Nak-won(1997). Introduction to Curriculum. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education. Unpublished.
  10. Lee Seung-mi 13others(2019). Systemization of Key Competencies and Skills in 2015 Revised National Subject. Korea Institute of Curriculum &Evaluation.MOE. MOE-Commissioned research-2019-7.
  11. Luca Trevisan(2010). Computational Complexity 2nd week lecture materials. https://cs.stanford.edu/people/trevisan/cs254-10/#info
  12. MOE(2016) 2015 Commentary on the general revised curriculum:middle school.
  13. Park Il-soo(2012). The Study on a Elementary School Teacher's Curriculum Orientation and Effective Teaching Behavior. 12(3).
  14. Pusan Natl. Univ. of Education(2021). Elementary School Social Subject 6th class first periods.
  15. Shin Soobum(2017). Research on the Evaluation Criteria of Programming Education based on Bloom's Taxonomy in the Elementary and Secondary School. 25(5).