Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Evaluation of Biodiversity Functions According to Land Use in Rural Areas

농촌지역 토지이용에 따른 생물다양성 기능 평가

  • 손진관 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 공민재 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 박민정 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 임류갑 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 강태경 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김광호 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김창현 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과)
  • Received : 2021.02.14
  • Accepted : 2021.05.26
  • Published : 2021.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Rural and agricultural landscapes are important forms of land use in maintaining biodiversity. In addition humans are provided with various public functions from ecosystems and agricultural ecosystems. But the creation of a facility horticultural complex can be a space that can undermine the public interest function of the agricultural ecosystem. Therefore, this study aims to quantify the function of ecosystem services that land use changes affect biodiversity in Korea's rice paddy fields. The area subject to the study was selected as the largest agricultural complex in Korea due to rice paddy fields and land use changes, and field agriculture was also carried out simultaneously. The survey was conducted only in the fields of vegetation, insects, amphibians, and birds, four areas of biodiversity that are believed to have a high impact on changes in land use in agricultural landscapes. The valuation of ecosystem services in four areas of biodiversity derived from this study was evaluated as non-market value. As a result of quantitative evaluation, about 25 species of vegetation were reduced due to changes in land use. The diversity of about 40 species of aquatic insects that inhabit rice paddies among insects has disappeared due to the creation of a horticultural complex. Birds and amphibian reptiles were also found to have decreased diversity and populations. This research is expected to be used in various ways to develop policies to enhance ecosystem service functions.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2021년 농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 전문연구원 연구지원사업 (PJ01419001)에 의해 이루어진 것임.

References

  1. Alison G. Power (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B pp. 2959-2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0137
  2. Baek, MK, Hwang, JM, Jeong, GS, Kim, TW, Kim, MC, Lee, YJ, Jo, YB, Park, SW, Lee, HS, Goo, DS, Jeong, JC, Kim, GG, Choi, DS, Sin, IH, Hwang, JH, Lee, JS, Kim, SS, and Bae, YS (2010) Checklist of Korean Insects, Nature & ecology academic, Seoul, pp. 598.
  3. Benton, TG, Bryant, DM, Cole, L and Crick HQP. (2002) Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades J. Appl. Ecol., 39 : 673-687. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00745.x
  4. Bestelmeyer, BT, Brown, JR, Havstad, KM, Alexander R, Chavez G and Herrick, JE. (2003) Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. J. Range Manage, 56(2) : 114-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003894
  5. Choi, YC, Kim, JG, Choi, JY, Kim, WT, Shim, HS and Park, BD (2007) Evaluation of Farm Lands located in Urban Area and Industrial Complex using Insect Diversity Indices. J. of the Korea Appl Entomol, 46(3) : 363-373. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2007.46.3.363
  6. Daily, GC (1997) What are ecosystem services. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  7. Donald, PF, Green, RE and Heath MF. (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci., 268 : 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1325
  8. Dunning, JB and Danielson, BJ. (1992) Ecological processesthat affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos, 65 : 468-475.
  9. Friederik, M, Jens, N, Andra IM, Tibor, H and Joern, F (2013) Integrating rural development and biodiversityconservation in Central Romania, Environmental Conservation, 40(2) : 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892912000392
  10. Gustafson, EJ. (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern. What is the state of the art Ecosystems, 1 : 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900011
  11. Holt, RD, Lawton, JH, Polis GA and Martinez ND. (1999) Trophic rank and the species area relationship. Ecology, 80 : 1495-1504. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1495:TRATSA]2.0.CO;2
  12. Jeremy, DM, Richard, LK and Wendell, CG (2003) Biodiversity across a Rural Land-Use Gradient, Conservation Biology, 17(5) : 1425-1434. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02371.x
  13. Kang, BH, Lee, JH and Park, JK. (2009) The Study on the Characteristics of Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Community for Conservation of Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscape, Kor. J. Env. Eco., 23(6) : 545-552.
  14. Kim, HS and Oh, CH (2011) Distribution Characteristics of Naturalized Plants According to Characteristics of Landscape Ecology in Rural Village of Korea, Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 34(6) : 389-403.
  15. Kim, SS and Oh, SI (2003) Valuation of The Multifunctionality of Agriculture, J. of Korea rural economic institute, 26(2) : 47-58.
  16. Kong, KS, Lee, CL, Lee, MH (2013) Evaluating Multifunctionalaity of Rice-Farming as regards Cliamate Change. J. of Korean Agricultural Management and Policy, 40(2) : 352-380.
  17. Korea Society of Systematic Zoology(KOSZ) (1997) List of animals in Korea. Academy Books. Korea Society of Systematic Zoology.
  18. Lee, CB (1993, 2006) Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa.
  19. Lee, KB, Kim , CH, Kim , JG, Lee, DB, Lee, SB and Na, SY (2003) How Soil Characteristics and Vegetation Influence the Inflow of Sewage in a Tributary of the Mankyeong River. Published by the Institute for Environmental Science, 12 : 9-21.
  20. Lee, YN (1996, 2006) New flora of Korea. Gyohaksa.
  21. MOE (2008) The 10th Ramsar Convention, a step forward in preserving the wetlands, pp 1-25.
  22. Myeong, SJ (2019) The Influence of Preadulthood Experiences in Rural Areas on Korean Adults' Perceptions on the Ecosystem Services of Rice-Paddies, The Korean Society for Environmental Education, 32(4) : 488-497. https://doi.org/10.17965/kjee.2019.32.4.488
  23. NIOE (2015) Methodological Development of the Ecosystem Services Assessment and Valuation.
  24. NIOE (2017) 2017 Development of Assessment Model for Ecosystem Services.
  25. Park, KL, Kong, MJ, Kim, NC and Son, JK (2012) The Analysis of Vegetation Characteristics of Organic Rice Paddy for Value Assessment of the Rice Paddy Wetland, Journal of Korean Wetlands Society, 14(1) : 59-73.
  26. Sala, O.E., F.S. Chapin, J.J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L.F. Huenneke, R.B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D.M. Lodge, H.A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N.L. Poff, M.T. Sykes, B.H. Walker, M. Walker, D.H. Wall. (2000) Biodiversity? global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770-1774. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
  27. Son, JK, Kong, MJ, Kang, DH and Lee, SY (2015a) A study on the improvement of Ecosystem Service Function for the Protected Horticulture Complex in Agricultural Landscape. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 21(4) : 45-53. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2015.21.4.045
  28. Son, JK, Kong, MJ, Kang, DH, Kang, BH, Yun, SW and Lee, SY. (2016b) The Comparative Studies on the Terrestrial Insect Diversity in Protected Horticulture Complex and Paddy Wetland. Journal of Wetlands Research, (18) 4 : 395-402.
  29. Son, JK, Kong, MJ, Kang, DH, Nam, HS and Kim, NC (2015b) The Comparative Studies on the Urban and Rural Landscape for the Plant Diversity Improvement in Pond Wetland, Journal of Wetlands Research, (17)1 : 62-74. https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2015.17.1.062
  30. Son, JK, Kong, MJ, Kang, DH, Park, MJ, Yun, SW and Lee, SY. (2016a) The Change Analysis of Plant Diversity in Protected Horticulture of Agricultural Ecosystems. Journal of Wetlands Research, 18 (2) : 173-182. https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2016.18.2.173
  31. Son, JK, Lee, SY, Kang, DH, Park, MJ, Yun, SW, Kim, NC, Kong, MJ and Choi DK. (2018) The Comparative Studies on the Avian Diversity in Protected Horticulture Complex and Paddy Wetland. Journal Of The Korean Society Of Rural Planning, (24) 4 : 57-67.
  32. Tischendorf, L. (2001) Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently. Landsc. Ecol, 16 : 235-254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011112719782
  33. Turner, BL and Doolittle, WE. (1978) The concept and measure of agricultural intensity Prof. Geogr, 30 : 279-301.
  34. Turner, DG, Gary, W, Marianne, G and David, F. (2001) Characteristics Of The Variable Star P Cygni Determ ined From Cluster Mem bership, JAAVSO, 29.
  35. UNEP. (2002) UNEP Global Environmental Outlook, vol. 3, Earthscan, London, United Kingdom.
  36. UNEP-RIVM. (2003) United Nations Environment Programme-Rijks Instituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. Quantification of environmental impacts The GEO-3 Scenarios, 2002-2032.
  37. Verburg, PH, Schulp, N, Witte, N and Veldkamp A. (2006) Landscape level impacts of change in European land use: high-resolution simulations with the CLUE model, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 114 : 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.023
  38. Zebisch, M, Wechsung, F and Kenneweg, H. (2004) Landscape response functions for biodiversity-assessing the impact of land-use changes at the county level Landscape Urban Plan, 67 : 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00036-7