디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권6호
  • /
  • Pages.185-198
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

구성원들의 침묵이 창의성과 혁신행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 회복탄력성의 조절효과를 중심으로

A Study on the Employees' Silence Influencing on Creativity and Innovation Behavior: Focusing on Moderating Effect of Resilience

  • 이병진 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 장은혜 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 이광희 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Lee, Byeong Jin (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Jang, Eun Hye (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Kwang Hee (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.27
  • 심사 : 2021.06.20
  • 발행 : 2021.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 변화하는 환경에 대응하기 위해 현대 기업이 고려해야 할 여러 가지 요인 중 인적자원의 중요성에 대해 알아보고 이를 검증하고자 한 연구이다. 독립변수로는 구성원들이 느끼는 동기에 의한 체념적 침묵과 방어적 침묵을 구성하였으며, 결과변수로는 창의성과 혁신행동을 설정하였다. 이러한 연구를 통해서 먼저 조직의 구성원들과 관리자간의 소통의 중요성을 알아보고, 이를 효율적으로 관리하고자 한다. 두 번째로 이들 간의 관계에서 회복탄력성의 조절효과에 대해 확인하고, 구성원들의 심리적 회복의 중요성을 알아보고자 한다. 이는 결국 인적자원을 관리함에 있어서 구성원들의 심리적 관리와 회복의 중요성을 이야기하고자 한다. 결과적으로 체념적 침묵은 창의성과 혁신행동에 부정적인 영향을 미치고 방어적 침묵의 경우 창의성과 혁신행동에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 회복탄력성의 조절효과의 경우 방어적 침묵과 창의성 및 혁신행동의 관계에서는 모두 유의미한 관계가 나타나지 않았으며, 체념적 침묵의 경우 혁신행동만 유의미한 관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 체념적 침묵과 방어적 침묵을 선택하게 되는 구성원들의 성향의 차이와 회복탄력성의 고유한 특징이 결합되면서 나타난 결과이다.

This study is a study to examine and verify the importance of human resources among the various factors that modern companies need to consider in order to cope with the changing environment. As independent variables, acquiescent and defensive silence were composed of the motives felt by members, and creativity and innovation behavior were set as the outcome variables. Through this research, first, the importance of communication between the members of the organization and the manager is investigated, and it is intended to be managed efficiently. Secondly, we would like to confirm the modulating effect of resilience in the relationship between them, and to find out the importance of psychological recovery of members. In the end, this aims to talk about the importance of psychological management and recovery of members in managing human resources. As a result, acquiescent silence negatively affects creativity and innovation behavior, and defensive silence positively affects creativity and innovation behavior. In addition, in the case of the moderating effect of resilience, there was no significant relationship in both defensive silence, creativity, and innovation behavior, and in the case of acquiescent silence, only innovation behavior was found to be significant. This is the result of the combination of the unique characteristics of resilience and the difference in the disposition of the members who choose resignation silence and defensive silence.

키워드

과제정보

This paper was supported by Research Fund, Kumoh National Institute of Technology

참고문헌

  1. L. Van Dyne, S. Ang & I.C. Botero, (2003) Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs, Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1359-1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384
  2. Pinder, & K.P. Harlos, (2001) Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as response to perceived injustice, In G.R. Ferris ed., Research in personnel and human resources management, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol.20, 331-369.
  3. E. W. Morrison & F. J. Milliken. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, 706-725. https://doi.org/10.2307/259200
  4. King, A. S. (1990). Evolution of leadership theory. Vikalpa, 15(2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919900205
  5. J. Farr, & C. Ford, (1990) Individual innovation. In West, M. & Farr, J. ed., Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies Wiley: Chichester, 63-80.
  6. O. Janssen, (2000) Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work behavior, Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73, 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  7. S.G. Scott & R.A. Bruce, (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
  8. R.W. Woodman, F.E. Sawyer & R.W. Griffin. (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity, Academy of Management Review, 18(2) 293-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
  9. T.M. Amabile, (1996) Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity, West view press.
  10. Mumford, M. D., et. al, (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00041-7
  11. R.M. Kanter, (1983) The change masters: Innovation for productivity in the American corporation, New York: Simon & Schuster.
  12. T.M. Amabile. (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  13. R.J. Sternberg & T.I. Lubart. (1996) Investing in Creativity, American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
  14. R.W. Woodman, F.E. Sawyer & R.W. Griffin. (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity, Academy of Management Review, 18(2) 293-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
  15. R. Drazin, M.A. Glynn, & R.K. Kazanjian, Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective, Academy of Management Review, 24(2) 286-307. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1893937
  16. E. H. Jang. (2012) A Study on Mediator Effect of Empowerment on Small - Medium Enterprises Job Characteristics and Creativity, Department of Business Administratio, Kum-oh National Institute of Technology
  17. Basadur, M. S. (1992). Managing creativity: A Japanese model. Academy of Management Executive, 6(2), 29-42.
  18. Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skills, and personality factors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(4), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1995.tb01399.x
  19. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
  20. S.G. Scott & R.A. Bruce, (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
  21. Oldham, G.R. & Cummings, A. (1996) Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
  22. B.A. Hennessey & T.M. Amabile, (1988) The conditions of creativity, In R. J. Sternberg ed., The nature of creativity, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 11-42.
  23. F. Barron, (1998) Putting creativity to work, in Sternberg, RJ ed, The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ, Press.
  24. T.M. Amabile, (1996) Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity, West view press.
  25. G. H. Shin, (2015) The Effects of Knowledge Hiding Behavior on Career Success and Innovation Performance. : Mediating Effects of Creativity, Doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University.
  26. A.S. Masten & J.L. Powell, (2003) A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice, In S.S. Luthar ed., Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1-25.
  27. Charney, D.S. (2004) Psychobiological Mechanisms of Resilience and Vulnerability: Implications for Successful Adaptation to Extreme Stress. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 369-391.
  28. A.S. Masten. (2011) Resilience in children threatened by extreme adversity: Frameworks for research, practice, and translational synergy, Development and Psychopathology, 23(2), 493-506. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579411000198
  29. J. H. Kim (2011) Resilience-a delightful secret that turns trials into good luck, wisdomhouse.
  30. Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: An empirical investigation. Employee Relations, 27(5), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450510611997
  31. E. W. Morrison & F. J. Milliken. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, 706-725. https://doi.org/10.2307/259200
  32. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
  33. Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24351328
  34. Kehr, H. M. (2004). Integrating Implicit Motives, Explicit Motives, and Perceived Abilities: The Compensatory Model of Work Motivation and Volition. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159055
  35. Fidler, L. A., & Johnson, J. D. (1984). Communication and innovation implementation. The Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 704-711. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277422
  36. Lin, H.-F. (2007) Knowledge Sharing and Firm Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Manpower, 28, 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272
  37. I. S. Lee, (1999) A Study on Antecedent Factors for Innovative Behaviors, Korean Academy of Organization and Management, 23(1), 89-113.
  38. M. Tugade & B. Fredrickson, (2004) Resilient Individuals Use Positive Emotions to Bounce Back from Negative Emotional Experiences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (86), 320-333.
  39. Smith, B. W. et. al, (2008) The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. International journal of behavioral medicine, 15(3), 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
  40. J. H. Park. (2011) The Relationship Between Resilience, Optimism, Positive Illusions and Psychosocial Adaptation in Broken family Adolescents, Doctoral dissertation, Korea University.
  41. F. H. Kerlinger, (1964) Foundations of behavioural Research: Educational and Psychological Inquiry, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  42. J.C. Nunnally, (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  43. C. Fornell & D.F. Larcker, (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  44. Podsakoff, P.M. & Organ, D.W. (1986) Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
  45. Harman, H.H. (1967) Modern Factor Analysis. University Press of Chicago, Chicago.
  46. R.M. Baron, & D.A. Kenny, (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173