Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences

The Korean Space Science Society (한국우주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Resonance Capture for a Mercurian Orbiter in the Vicinity of Sun

  • Khattab, Elamira Hend (Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Faculty of Science, Cairo University) ;
  • El-Salam, Fawzy Ahmed Abd (Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Faculty of Science, Cairo University) ;
  • Rahoma, Walid A. (Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Faculty of Science, Cairo University)
  • Received : 2021.01.23
  • Accepted : 2021.04.06
  • Published : 2021.06.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this work, the problem of resonance caused by some gravitational potentials due to Mercury and a third body, namely the Sun, together with some non-gravitational perturbations, specifically coronal mass ejections and solar wind in addition to radiation pressure, are investigated. Some simplifying assumptions without loss of accuracy are employed. The considered force model is constructed. Then the Delaunay canonical set is introduced. The Hamiltonian of the problem is obtained then it is expressed in terms of the Deluanay canonical set. The Hamiltonian is re-ordered to adopt it to the perturbation technique used to solve the problem. The Lie transform method is surveyed. The Hamiltonian is doubly averaged. The resonance capture is investigated. Finally, some numerical simulations are illustrated and are analyzed. Many resonant inclinations are revealed.

Keywords

References

  1. Abd El-Salam FA, El-Tohamy IA, Ahmed MK, Rahoma WA, Rassem MA, Invariant relative orbits for satellite constellations: a second order theory, Appl. Math. Comput. 181, 6-20 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.01.004
  2. Abd El-Salam FA, Perturbative effects on a Mercurian orbiter due to the solar radiation pressure, solar wind and the coronal mass ejections, New Astron. 12, 490-496 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2007.02.002
  3. Anselmo L, Bertotti B, Farinella P, Milani A, Nobili AM, Orbital perturbations due to radiation pressure for a spacecraft of complex shape, Celest. Mech. 29, 27-43 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358596
  4. Arfken GB, Weber HJ, Harris FE, Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide (Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 2012).
  5. Breen AR, Riley P, Lazarus AJ, Canals A, Fallows RA, et al., The solar wind at solar maximum: comparisons of EISCAT IPS and in situ observations, Ann. Geophys., Eur. Geosci. Union. 20, 1291-1309 (2002). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-20-1291-2002
  6. Breiter S, Extended fundamental model of resonance, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 85, 209-218 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022569419866
  7. Breiter S, Lunisolar apsidal resonances at low satellite orbits, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 74, 253-274 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008379908163
  8. Breiter S, Lunisolar resonances revisited, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 81, 81-91 (2001b). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013363221377
  9. Breiter S, On the coupling of lunisolar resonances for Earth satellite orbits, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 80, 1-20 (2001a). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012284224340
  10. Broucke RA, Long-term third-body effects via double averaging, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26, 27-32 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5041
  11. Carvalho JPS, Moraes RV, Prado AFBA, Nonsphericity of the moon and near sun-synchronous polar lunar orbits, Math. Probl. Eng. 2009, 740460 (2009a). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/740460
  12. Carvalho JPS, Moraes RV, Prado AFBA, Non-sphericity of the moon and critical inclination, Proceedings of the 32nd Congresso Nacional de Matematica Aplicada e Computacional, Cuiab, Brazil, 10-20 Sep 2009b.
  13. Carvalho JPS, Moraes RV, Prado AFBA, Semi-analytic theory of a Moon artificial satellite considering lunar oblateness and perturbations due to a third-body in elliptic orbit, Proceedings of the 7th Brazilian Conference on Dynamics, Control and Applications, Presidente Prudente, Brazil, 7-9 May 2008.
  14. Carvalho JPS, Moraes RV, Prado AFBA, Some orbital characteristics of lunar artificial satellites, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 108, 371-388 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-010-9310-6
  15. Celletti A, Analysis of resonances in the spin-orbit problem in celestial mechanics: the synchronous resonance (part I), Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 41, 174-204 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00945107
  16. Celletti A, Chierchia L, Hamiltonian stability of spin-orbit resonances in celestial mechanics, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 76, 229-240 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008341317257
  17. Chametla RO, D'Angelo G, Reyes-Ruiz M, Javier Sanchez-Salcedo F, Capture and migration of Jupiter and Saturn in mean motion resonance in a gaseous protoplanetary disc, Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc. 492, 6007-6018 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa260
  18. Cook GE, Luni-solar perturbations of the orbit of an Earth satellite, Geophys. J. Int. 6, 271-291 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1962.tb00351.x
  19. Costa Filho OO, Sessin W, The extended Delaunay method applied to first order resonance, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 74, 1-17 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008310827412
  20. Deprit A, Canonical transformations depending on a small parameter, Celest. Mech. 1, 12-30 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01230629
  21. Domingos RC, Vilhena de Moraes R, Prado AFBA, Third-body perturbation in the case of elliptic orbits for the disturbing body, Math. Probl. Eng. 2008, 763654 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/763654
  22. Delhaise F, Morbidelli A, Luni-solar effects of geosynchronous orbits at the critical inclination, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 57, 155-173 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692471
  23. El-Enna AA, Ahmed MKM, Abd El-Salam FA, Analytical treatment of the relativistic and solar radiation pressure effects on an artificial satellite, Appl. Math. Comput. 175, 1525-1542 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.09.001
  24. El-Saftawy MI, Analytical study of the resonance caused by solar radiation pressure on a spacecraft, Astrophys. Space Sci. 295, 407-419 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-005-6563-8
  25. El-Saftawy MI, Ahmed MKM, Helali YE, The effect of direct solar radiation pressure on a spacecraft of complex shape, Astrophys. Space Sci. 259, 141-149 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001517205529
  26. Ferrer S, Osacar C, Harrington's Hamiltonian in the stellar problem of three bodies: reductions, relative equilibria and bifurcations. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 58, 245-275 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691977
  27. Fitzpatrick PM, Principles of Celestial Mechanics (Academic Press, New York, NY, 1970).
  28. Folta D, Quinn D, Lunar frozen orbits, in AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Co, 21-24 Aug 2006.
  29. Gilthorpe MS, Moore P, Winterbottom AN, Analysis of the orbital elements of the satellite COSMOS 1603 (1984-106A) at 14th-order resonance, Planet. Space Sci. 38, 1147-1159 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(90)90023-J0633(90)90023-J
  30. Henrard J, Caranicolas ND, Motion near the 3/1 resonance of the planar elliptic restricted three body problem, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 47, 99-121 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051201
  31. Kamel AA, Expansion formulae in canonical transformations depending on a small parameter, Celest. Mech. 1, 190-199 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228838
  32. Khattab EH, Radwan M, Rahoma WA, Frozen orbits construction for a lunar solar sail, J. Astron. Space Sci. 37, 1-9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2020.37.1.1
  33. Kozai Y, Effects of solar radiation pressure on the motion of an artificial satellite, Smithsonian Contrib. Astrophys. 6, 109 (1963).
  34. Kwok JH, Doubly averaging method for third body perturbations, AAS Paper 91-464 (1991).
  35. Kwok JH, Long-term orbit prediction using an averaging method, AIAA Paper 84-1985 (1985).
  36. Lara M, Design of long-lifetime lunar orbits: a hybrid approach, Acta Astronaut. 69, 186-199 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.03.009
  37. Lara M, Three-body dynamics around the smaller primary. Application to the design of science orbits, J. Aerosp. Eng. Sci. Appl. 2, 53-65 (2010). https://doi.org/10.7446/jaesa.0201.06
  38. Lari G, Saillenfest M, Fenucci M, Long-term evolution of the Galilean satellites: the capture of Callisto into resonance, Astron. Astrophys. 639, A40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037445
  39. Lewis JS, Physics and Chemistry of the Solar System (Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 2004).
  40. Musen P, The influence of the solar radiation pressure on the motion of an artificial satellite, J. Geophys. Res. 65, 1391-1396 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ065i005p01391
  41. Prado AFBA, Third-body perturbation in orbits around natural satellites. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26, 33-40 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5042
  42. Pichierri G, Morbidelli A, Crida A, Capture into first-order resonances and long-term stability of pairs of equal-mass planets, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 130, 54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9848-2
  43. Rahoma W, Orbital elements evolution due to a perturbing body in an inclined elliptical orbit, J. Astron. Space Sci. 31, 199-204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.3.199
  44. Rahoma W, Abd El-Salam F, The effects of Moon's uneven mass distribution on the critical inclinations of a lunar orbiter, J. Astron. Space Sci. 31, 285-294 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.4.285
  45. Rahoma WA, Khattab EH, Abd El-Salam FA, Relativistic and the first sectorial harmonics corrections in the critical inclination, Astrophys. Space Sci. 351, 113-117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-014-1811-4
  46. Rickman H, Froeschle C, A keplerian method to estimate perturbations in the restricted three-body problem, Moon Planets. 28, 69-86 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01371674
  47. Roth EA, Construction of a consistent semianalytic theory of a planetary or moon orbiter perturbed by a third body, Celest. Mech. 28, 155-169 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01230668
  48. Scheeres DJ, Guman MD, Villac BF, Stability analysis of planetary satellite orbiters: application to the Europa orbiter, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 24, 778-787 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4778
  49. Sehnal L, Non-gravitational forces in satellite dynamics, in Satellite Dynamics, eds. Giacaglia GEO, Stickland AC (Springer, Berlin, 1975).
  50. Sehnal L, Radiation pressure effects in the motion of artificial satellites, in Dynamics of Satellites (1969), ed. Morando B (Springer, Berlin, 1970), 262-272.
  51. Szebehely V, Perturbations of the regularized equations of the restricted problem of three bodies, Astron. J. 69, 309-315 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1086/109275