Medical Lasers

  • 제10권4호
  • /
  • Pages.207-213
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2287-8300(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0224(eISSN)
대한의학레이저학회 (Korean Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stability and Effectiveness of Laser and Liquiband Treatments in the Rat Model of Oral Ulcer

  • 투고 : 2021.03.23
  • 심사 : 2021.05.07
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background and Objectives This study was undertaken to assess the stability and efficacy of laser therapy (808 nm), Liquiband (a commercial topical skin adhesive product), and a combination treatment, for application in oral ulcers. Materials and Methods The oral ulcer rat animal model was used to determine the efficacy of photobiomodulation, Liquiband, or combination therapy. Ulcers were induced by injecting 60% acetic acid in the oral mucosa. Three days after ulcer confirmation, the chemically induced ulcers were treated with either laser (808 nm), Liquiband, or a combination of both, every two days for 8 days (4 sessions). Combination therapy was performed by first treating with laser followed by application of the Liquiband. Reduction in ulcer area size was subsequently determined, and animals were sacrificed at 5 and 10 days after the last administration, for histological observation of the extracted oral ulcer tissue samples. Results In this study, treatment with either laser (808 nm) or commercial Liquiband product as well as the combined treatment significantly enhanced oral ulcer healing in the rat animal model. The effect of laser treatment is mainly attributed to collagen synthesis, whereas application of the Liquiband promotes vascularization and formation of granulation tissue. Our results indicate that further optimization of the combined therapy could synergistically and significantly enhance oral ulcer healing. Conclusion Laser or Liquiband treatment of oral ulcer in the rat animal model exert different outcomes, but both methods confirm significant effects relative to the untreated group. The combined treatment group with laser and Liquiband showed marked oral ulcer healing, but further optimization is required to get highly significant results and establish the potential synergistic effect of the combination therapy, as compared to the individual enhancing effects of healing oral ulcers.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by research grants from Hanmi Healthcare Co., Inc.

참고문헌

  1. Lim YS, Kwon SK, Park JH, Cho CG, Park SW, Kim WK. Enhanced mucosal healing with curcumin in animal oral ulcer model. Laryngoscope 2016;126:E68-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25649
  2. Wray D, Graykowski EA, Notkins AL. Role of mucosal injury in initiating recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981;283:1569-70. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.283.6306.1569
  3. Jurge S, Kuffer R, Scully C, Porter SR. Mucosal disease series. Number VI. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Dis 2006;12:1-21.
  4. Sircus W, Church R, Kelleher J. Recurrent aphthous ulceration of the mouth; a study of the natural history, aetiology, and treatment. Q J Med 1957;26:235-49.
  5. Ship JA, Chavez EM, Doerr PA, Henson BS, Sarmadi M. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Quintessence Int 2000;31:95-112.
  6. Basirat M. The effects of low power lasers in healing of oral ulcers. J Lasers Med Sci 2012;3:79-83.
  7. Khademi H, Shirani AM, Nikegbal F. Evaluation of low level laser therapy in recurrent aphthous stomatitis. J Dent 2009;10:160-2.
  8. Hamblin MR, Demidova TN. Mechanisms of low level light therapy. In: Hamblin MR, Waynant RW, Anders J, editors. Mechanisms for low-light therapy; 2006 Jan 21-26; San Jose. SPIE; 2006.
  9. Mun IK, Yoo WS, Lee SJ, Chung PS, Woo SH. Effect of low-level laser therapy on propylthiouracil-induced hypothyroidism model mice: a pilot study. Med Laser 2021;10:37-44. https://doi.org/10.25289/ML.2021.10.1.37
  10. Yoo SH. Effect of photobiomodulation on the mesenchymal stem cells. Med Laser 2020;9:119-125. https://doi.org/10.25289/ML.2020.9.2.119
  11. Penoff J. Skin closures using cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives. Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee. Device and Technique Assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:730-1. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199902000-00062
  12. Farion K, Osmond MH, Hartling L, Russell K, Klassen T, Crumley E, et al. Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;(3):CD003326.
  13. Ando M, Tamaki T, Yoshida M, Sasaki S, Toge Y, Matsumoto T, et al. Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: a comparative study between 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate and staples for wound closure. Eur Spine J 2014;23:854-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3202-5
  14. Grimaldi L, Cuomo R, Brandi C, Botteri G, Nisi G, D'Aniello C. Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesive for skin closure: eight years experience. In Vivo 2015;29:145-8.
  15. Nauta A, Gurtner G, Longaker MT. Wound healing and regenerative strategies. Oral Dis 2011;17:541-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01787.x
  16. Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci 2010;123(Pt 24):4195-200. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.023820
  17. Shin JM, Kim JE. Radiofrequency in clinical dermatology. Med Laser 2013;2:49-57. https://doi.org/10.25289/ml.2013.2.2.49
  18. Kim YK, Lee HJ, Kim J. Potential efficacy of multiple-shot long-pulsed 1,064-nm Nd:YAG in nonablative skin rejuvenation: a pilot study. Med Laser 2020;9:159-165. https://doi.org/10.25289/ML.2020.9.2.159
  19. Miller MF, Ship II. A retrospective study of the prevalence and incidence of recurrent aphthous ulcers in a professional population, 1958-1971. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;43:532-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90105-0
  20. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Chi AC. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
  21. Calderhead RG. Photobiological basics of photomedicine: a Work of art still in progress. Med Laser 2017;6:45-57. https://doi.org/10.25289/ml.2017.6.2.45