DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사회적 상호작용과 도구 개선을 강조한 '탐구적 과학 글쓰기' 수업에 대한 중학교 과학 영재 학생들의 인식

The Perception of Middle School Science-Gifted Students on the 'Science Writing Heuristic' Class Emphasizing Social Interaction and Tool Improvement

  • 투고 : 2020.11.02
  • 심사 : 2021.01.08
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28

초록

본 연구에서는 전라남도 소재의 국립대학교 과학영재교육원 소속 중학생 10명을 대상으로 사회적 상호작용과 도구 개선을 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 수업을 실시하여 STS 관계와 수업의 효과에 대한 학생들의 인식을 조사하였다. 사회적 상호작용과 도구 개선을 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 수업 후 학생들은 STS 관계에 대하여 다음과 같은 인식을 가지게 되었다. 과학 영재 학생들은 실험 도구와 기술이 과학이론 발전에 기여하며, 과학 기술만으로 모든 사회 문제를 해결하는 것이 어려우며, 과학이 사회적 상호작용 활동이라는 인식을 갖게 되었다. 또한 과학 영재 학생들은 동일 주제로 여러 시간 진행한 집중 탐구, 동료 평가 등을 이용한 다른 조원과의 의사소통, 같은 조원과 문제를 해결하는 의사소통, 탐구 과정에서 도구를 개선하는 활동, 익숙한 재료와 현상을 이용한 탐구 등을 통해 STS의 관련성을 인식하게 되었다고 응답하였다. 중학생 대상의 과학 영재 수업에서 학생들이 STS의 관계를 효과적으로 인식하도록 하기 위해서는 다양한 실험 도구를 활용한 문제 해결 경험, 동일 주제로 탐구 문제를 해결하는 과정에서 시행착오 경험, 연구 문제를 해결하는 과정에서 도구의 개선 경험, 동일한 주제로 탐구 활동을 진행하는 동료와의 의사소통경험, 다른 조와 탐구 결과를 공유하는 경험, 학생에게 익숙한 소재와 현상을 이용한 탐구 활동 등을 제공할 필요가 있다

In this study, a science writing heuristic class with emphasis on social interaction and tool improvement for 10 middle school students at the National University Science-Gifted Education Center in Jeollanamdo was conducted to investigate the perception of STS (science technology society) relationship and students' perception of the effects of class. After science writing heuristic class emphasizing social interaction and tool improvement, the students became aware of the STS relationships as follows: Science-gifted students have come to perceive that experimental tools and technology contribute to the development of scientific theory, that it is difficult to solve all social problems with only science and technology, and that science is a social interaction activity. In addition, science-gifted students responded that they became aware of the relevance of STS through intensive inquiry conducted on the same subject for several hours, communications with colleagues in another group through peer reviews, communication to solve problems with colleagues in the same group, activities to improve tools in the process of inquiry, inquiry using familiar materials and phenomena. In order for students to effectively recognize the relationship of STS in science-gifted class for middle school students, it is necessary to provide experience to solve problems using various experimental tools, experience to have trial and error in the process of solving inquiry problem under the same subject, experience to improve tools in the process of solving inquiry problem, experience to communicate with colleagues who conduct inquiry activities under the same subject, experience to share the results with other groups, and inquiry activities using familiar materials and phenomena.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 순천대학교 학술연구비(과제번호 : 2020-0235) 공모과제로 연구되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: "View in Science-Thchnology-Society" (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Bayir, E., Cakici, Y., & Ertas, O. (2014). Exploring natural and social scientists' views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1286-1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.860496
  4. Chung, Y., & Kim, S. W. (2015). Transfer of students' understanding of NOS through SSI instruction. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 895-905. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0895
  5. Fullick, P., & Ratcliffe, M. (Eds.) (1996). Teaching ethical aspects of science. Southampton: The Bassett Press.
  6. Hwang, Y. H., & Park, J. S. (2010). Development and application of CNP model for the enhancing creativity of scientifically gifted students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 20(3), 847-866.
  7. Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collons, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10). 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
  8. Kim, H., & Lim, H. (2014). Elementary science gifted students' perceptions of decision-making activities on socioscientific issues. The Journal of Education, 34(3), 237-252.
  9. Kim, M., Kim, S., Noh, T., & Choi, S. (2019). The influences of integrated science and science and science inquiry experiment developed under the 2015 revised national curriculum on students' interest in science, scientific attitude, views on science-technology-society relationship, and views on nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(6), 791-797. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.6.791
  10. Kim, S. H., & Lee, Y. H. (2016). The study on science teacher's understandings of the nature of science (NOS) through the science writing heuristics(SWH). Biology Education, 44(3), 538-554. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.3.538
  11. Ko, S., & Choe, S. (2013). Effectiveness of science gifted students' self-directed and cooperative learning for decision-making about global warming issues. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(4), 567-592. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.4.567
  12. Korea Educational Development Institute (1992). 6th Curriculum revision study(ministry of education): Department of elementary, middle and high school science.
  13. Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Construction of a paper-and pencil test of basic scientific literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the american association for the advancement of science. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/4/003
  14. Lee, E., Lee, E., & Chung, Y. (2016). Effects of socioscientific issues (SSI) programs on enhancing high school students' moral judgement and SSI reasoning skills. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(8), 219-237.
  15. Lee, H., Choi, Y., & Ko, Y. (2015). Effects of collective intelligence-based SSI instruction on promoting middle school students' key competencies as citizens. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0431
  16. Lee, S. (1999). The assessment of the scientific literacy of high school students, pre-service and in-service science teachers. Master's Thesis: Seoul National University.
  17. Lee, S., Kim, E., & Chang, H. (2011). The effects of science writing heuristic (SWH) instruction on elementary school students' science process skills and scientific attitude. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 589-600. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2011.30.4.589
  18. Lee, S., & Nam, J. (2016). Impact of student assessment activities on reflective thinking in high school argument-based inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0347
  19. Lee, Y. H. (2013). A proposal of inclusive framework of the nature of science (NOS) based on the 4 themes of scientific literacy for K-12 school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(3), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.3.553
  20. Ministry of Education (1997). 7th Science curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice No. 1997-15.
  21. Ministry of Education (2015). National curriculum of science. Ministry of Education Notice No. 2015-74.
  22. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development (2007). National curriculum of science. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development Notice No. 2007-79.
  23. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). National curriculum of science. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Notice No. 2011-361.
  24. Moon, S., & Choi, W. (2018). The effect of high school research project using the science writing heuristic. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 62(5), 398-411. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.5.398
  25. Noh, T., & Kang, S. (1997). The effect of the 'General Science' course on the students' views about science-technology-society relationship and their perceptions of science classroom environment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 17(4), 395-403.
  26. Noh, T., Kim, H. B., Kim, Y., Seong, E., & Hong, J. L. (2003). The change of students' views on the relationship between science/technology and society during the high school 'Science' course. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(6), 650-659.
  27. Park, S. H., & Chung, Y. L. (2012). The effect of science writing heuristic (SWH) on scientific inquiry skills, logical thinking, and metacognition of middle school students. Biology Education, 40(3), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.3.367
  28. Park, S., Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2017). Students' perception on the effects of the SSI instruction using digital storytelling approaches. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0181
  29. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision-making. Journal of Research in Science Education, 42, 112-138.
  30. Shin, E., & Choi, W. (2020). Middle school science gifted students' perceptions of the effectiveness of science classes using science writing heuristic. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 64(5), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2020.64.5.277
  31. Son, J. W., & Jeong, E. J. (2013). Application and development of a storytelling teaching-learning method using the science writing heuristic. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 17(3), 709-727. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.3.709
  32. Yang, C., Kim, M., & Noh, T. (2015). The influences of integrated science developed under the 2009 revised national curriculum on students' views on nature of science and science-technology-society relationship, interest in science, and science aspiration. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 549-555. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0549
  33. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048