DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Research on Utilization of KDC Based on Literary Warrant

문헌적 근거에 기반한 한국십진분류법(KDC) 활용현황에 대한 연구

  • Received : 2021.04.26
  • Accepted : 2021.05.21
  • Published : 2021.05.31

Abstract

General-purpose classification scheme encompasses all subject areas, While the whole classification scheme is constructed by library studies experts, structure and preparation of each specific subject area's classification should be referenced to that specific subject. In order for the whole system to be practical and useful classification scheme, not just a simple collection of each subject area's scheme, it is necessary to set the rule for properly distributing the amount of classification items, and the collections assigned to these items. The rule to set the distribution of items based on the amount of document collections is called 'literary warrant'. This study examines actual status of assignment of each classification items to information resources, as a result of application of Korean Decimal Classification, and then suggests a way to improve these practices.

범용의 문헌분류체계는 모든 주제분야를 포괄한다. 전체적인 분류체계는 문헌정보학 전문가가 구성하더라도, 개별 주제영역의 분류항목 구성과 전개는 해당 주제영역의 그것을 참고하는 것이 효율적이다. 전체 주제를 포괄하는 문헌분류체계가 각 주제분야에서 개발한 분류체계의 단순한 모음이 아닌 실용적인 분류체계가 되기 위해서는 각 항목에 배정되는 문헌량의 다과를 반영한 항목 설정과 세분이 필요하다. 분류항목의 설정에 있어 문헌량의 다과에서 항목 설정의 타당성과 근거를 찾는 것을 문헌적 근거(literary warrant)라 부른다. 본고에서는 한국십진분류법(KDC)에 전개된 각각의 분류항목에 어느 정도의 정보자원이 배정되고 있는지를 실증적으로 확인하고 이를 기반으로 향후 개정방안을 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 충남대학교 CNU 학술연구비의 지원을 받아 수행되었음.

References

  1. Kim, Sungwon (2012). A research on close classification for korean fiction in KDC; focusing on public library. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(3), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.3.057
  2. Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2014). The improvements of the tourism field in the 6th Edition of KDC. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(1), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.1.201403.103
  3. Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2017). The improvements of the social welfare field in the 6th edition of KDC. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(3), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.201709.63
  4. Korea. Committee on Library and Information Policy (2021). National Libraries Statistics System. Available: http://www.libsta.go.kr/index.do
  5. Oh, Young-Ok & Lee, Mi-Hwa (2019). A study on the improvement and application of KDC 6th ed. for classifying the children's books. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.105
  6. Lee, Hee-Jin & Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2013) The improvements of the physical education field in the 6th edition of KDC. Journal of the Biblia Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 24(4), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.4.301
  7. Jeon, Chang-ho & Do, Tae-hyun (2014). The literary warrant based improvements of Korean Decimal Classification. Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 115-122.
  8. Chung, Ok-Kyung (2014). A study on expansion of headings for digital trends of Korean Decimal Classification. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(2), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.2.177
  9. Cho, Hye-Chon & Chung, Yeon Kyoung (2018). A study on improvement for classification of fiction to enhance to accessibility for middle school students. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.1.061
  10. Hahn, Kyung-Shin (2014). A study on the military science schedules of KDC. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(4), 207-229. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.201412.207
  11. Korean Library Association (2010). The Glossary of Library and Information Science. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  12. Korean Library Association, Committee of Classification (2013). Korean Decimal Classification and Relative Index 6th ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  13. American Library Association (2013). ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science, 4th ed. Atlanta: ALA.
  14. Barite, Mario (2018). Literary Warrant. Knowledge Organization, 45(6), 517-536. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-6-517
  15. Chan, L. M., Intner, S. S., & Weihs. J. (2016). Guide to the Library of Congress Classification. Santa Babara: Libraries Unlimited.
  16. Hulme, E. W. (1911). Principles of Book Classification: Chapter III: on the definition of class headings, and the natural limit to the extension of book classification. Library Association Record, (13), 444-449.
  17. Kumar, K. (1981). Theory of Classification. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
  18. OCLC (2015). Dewey Decimal Classification Glossary. Available: http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/glossary/dewey.en.html#C
  19. OCLC (2016). Webdewey. Available: http://www.dewey.org/webdewey/standardSearch.html
  20. Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to Library Classification. New York: Asia Publishing House.