DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Effects of Smart Learning Math Class on Academic Achievement, Mathematical Interest, and Attitude

스마트러닝 수학 수업이 학업성취도, 수학적 흥미, 태도에 미치는 영향

  • 김성태 (연세대학교 인지과학협동과정) ;
  • 강현민 (연세대학교 정보대학원) ;
  • 박윤정 (연세대학교 인지과학협동과정)
  • Received : 2021.03.15
  • Accepted : 2021.04.30
  • Published : 2021.05.31

Abstract

Since Covid-19, many educational institutions no longer view online learning as an additional material, but use it as their main learning tool. In this study, we tried to summarize the definition of smart learning and examined how smart learning math classes affect academic achievement, mathematical interest, and attitudes. We manipulate groups that conducted smart learning and groups that conducted face-to-face learning, and compare academic performance, mathematical interest, and attitudes after six weeks of learning. As a result, we found that the smart learning group had a large values in all three factors compared to the face-to-face learning group. We also found moderating effect. Students with lower grades largely improved their academic achievement scores as the difference in attitude changes through smart learning compared to those with higher grades.

Covid -19 이후 온라인 학습에 대한 관심과 수요가 증가하면서 많은 교육기관은 더 이상 온라인 학습을 부가적인 자료로 바라보지 않고 주된 학습 수단으로 사용하게 되었다. 본 연구에서는 스마트러닝에 대한 정의를 살펴보고 실험을 통해 스마트러닝 수학 수업이 학업성취도와 수학적 흥미, 태도에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 집단을 구분하여 6주간 스마트러닝을 실시한 집단과 대면학습을 실시한 집단 간에 학업성취도, 수학적 흥미, 태도를 비교하였다. 그 결과, 스마트러닝을 실시한 집단이 대면학습을 실시한 집단에 비해 세 요인 모두 사전-사후 차이가 큰 것을 발견하였다. 또한 스마트러닝을 실시한 학생들은 기존의 성적 수준이 태도 변화와 학업성취도 변화 사이에 유의한 조절효과가 있었다. 구체적으로 기존의 성적이 낮은 학생들은 높은 학생에 비해 스마트러닝을 통해 태도변화 차이가 클수록 학업성취도 점수도 크게 향상하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. B. W. Brown, C. E. Liedholm, Can web courses replace the classroom in principles of microeconomics?, American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 444-448, 2002. doi:10.1257/000282802320191778
  2. C. Kim, S. W. Park, J. Cozart, Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 171-185, 2014. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01382.x
  3. M. de Carvalho Borba, S. Llinares, Online mathematics teacher education: overview of an emergent field of research, ZDM, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 697-704, 2012. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0457-3
  4. J. Lee, H. Kang, E-learning and edutainment, Geulnurim, 2007.
  5. B. Jeon, Christian Education of Faith in Terms of Mobile Learning, College & Gospel, Vol. 17, pp. 139-188, 2013.
  6. M. J. Rosenberg, E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age, McGraw-Hill, 2002.
  7. K. Lee, J. Kim, S. Han, E-learning at university: class ideas for caring professors and thinking students, Korea Education and Research Information Institute Research Report, RR 2008-5, pp.1-115, 2008.
  8. S. K. Park, An Analysis of Middle School Students' Perceptions and Learning Satisfaction in SMART Learning-based Science Instruction, The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 727-737, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2013.34.7.727
  9. Y. O. Ahn, S. Park, S. Hwang, A Study on the Application of Smart Learning for the Domain of Expressive Activities in Elementary School, The Korean Society of Elementary Physical Education, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 1-16, 2013.
  10. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, Information Technology-Vocabulary-Part 36 - Learning, Education and Training, KS X ISO IEC 2381-36, 2010.
  11. B. R. Lim, I. Park, The impact of technology-enhanced classrooms on teaching and learning practices, The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 237-259, 2010. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2010.22.4.237
  12. G. C. Lee, S. D. Kwon, A Study on Successful Factors of Smart Learning Startups, Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Socieity, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 74-96, 2016. https://doi.org/10.24878/TKES.2016.11.1.74
  13. I. Kang, B. Lim, J. Park, Exploring the theoretical framework and teaching & learning strategies of Smart Learning: Using cases of university classrooms, The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 283-303, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2012.24.2.283
  14. Y. S., Ko, H. Y. Shin, A Study of The Currents Status of Smart Learning and Its Entry into Overseas Markets, The Korean Society of Science & Art, Vol. 10, pp.1-14, 2012. doi:10.17548/ksaf.2012.07.10.1
  15. M. Seol, C. Shon, A Survey on Teacher's Perceptions about the Current State of Using Smart Learning in Elementary Schools, JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 309-318, 2012.
  16. E-Learning Industry Development Committee, Basic plan for e-learning industry development and activation, Act on Development of E-Learning Industry and Promotion of Utilization of E-Learning, Article 2, Clause 1, Korea Legislation Research Institute, 2015.
  17. E. Hong, Smart Learning Strategies for Teaching Korean as a Foreign/Second Language, korean language education research, Vol, 49, No. 1, pp. 123-145, 2014. doi:10.20880/kler.2014.49.1.123
  18. Y. Kim, J. Kim, S. Park, M. Jung, Global e-learning standardization trend analysis and domestic e-learning standardization strategy establishment study, Daegu: National IT Industry Promotion Agency, 2015.
  19. S. N. Lee, A Study of the Impacts of Smart Learning and Accounting Information Characteristics on Student's Satisfaction and Educational Performance, Review of Accounting and Policy Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 149-171, 2012.
  20. S. G. Han, S. Jeon, The Study on Recognition and Attitude of Elementary School Teachers about Newest IT : focus on s-Learning, Social Network, and Web3.0, JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-10, 2012.
  21. 노규성, 주성환, 정진택, An Exploratory Study on Concept and Realization Conditions of Smart Learning, Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 79-88, 2011. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2011.9.2.079
  22. J. Kang, A Study on Utilizing SNS to Vitalize Smart Learning, Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 266-274, 2011.
  23. I, Kang, B. Lim, J. Park, Exploring the theoretical framework and teaching & learning strategies of Smart Learning: Using cases of university classrooms , The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 283-303, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2012.24.2.283
  24. G. Mothib, A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between E-Learning and Students' Academic Achievement in Higher Education, Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 6, No. 9, pp. 6-9, 2015.
  25. HJ. Kim, The effect of mobile phone use on university students' english reading achievement, The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology(JCCT), Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.183-189, 2019. doi:10.17703/JCCT.2019.5.4.183
  26. S. Y, S. S, Evaluation of the effect of eduxational smartphone app for nursing students, International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 60-66, 2019. doi:10.17703/IJACT.2019.7.2.60
  27. R. Sarikhani, M. Salari, and V. Mansouri, The impact of e-learning on university sudents' academic achievement and creativity, Journal of Technical Education and Training, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2016.
  28. H. Yoon, S. Choi, Development and application of the Smart Learning Teaching-Learning Program in Elementary Science Class - Focused on the unit of Solar System and Star, Journal of Science Education, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 321-332, 2015. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.3.321
  29. J. Hwang, S. G. Han, A Study on Blended Learning Strategy in Smart Education, JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 183-190, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.2.183
  30. Y. W. Lin, C. L. Tseng, and P. J. Chiang, The effect of blended learning in mathematics course EURASIA, Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 741-770, 2016. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a
  31. H. C. Yoon, S. L. Kim, The effects of smart learning on mathematics disposition and attitude, Journal of Elementary Education, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 23-44, 2014.
  32. H. Youn, W. H. Whang, The effects of using smart phone applications in problem solving on students' disposition and attitude toward mathematics and recognition of mathematics, The Journal of Curriculum and Instrunction Studies, Vol. 7, Np. 1, pp. 1-35, 2014.
  33. K. Kim, W. Kim, I. Choi, K. Sang, H. K. Kim, J. A. Shin, S. Kim, 2010 NAEA (National Assessment of Educational Achievement) Results and Implications -The 3rd Grade of Middle School -, Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation, RRE 2011-2-2, 2011. doi:10.23000/TRKO201300029834
  34. K. Singh, M. Granville, S. Dika, Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement, The journal of educational research, Vol. 95, No. 6, pp. 323-332, 2002. doi:10.1080/00220670209596607
  35. T. Sung, Understanding of educational research method, Hakjisa, 2016.
  36. L. R. Aiken, Attitudes toward mathematics, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 40, pp. 551-596, 1970. doi:10.3102/00346543040004551
  37. Korean Education Development Institute, Mathematics education evaluation system for pursuing the essence of education, Korean Education Development Institute, RM 92-5-2, 1992.
  38. A. F. Hayes, PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling, 2012.