DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Knockdown of vps54 aggravates tamoxifen-induced cytotoxicity in fission yeast

  • Lee, Sol (Department of New Drug Development, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Nam, Miyoung (Department of New Drug Development, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Ah-Reum (Department of New Drug Development, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Tae (Department of New Drug Development, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Min Jung (Department of New Drug Development, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Ju Seong (Department of New Drug Development, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kong, Andrew Hyunsoo (Morrissey College of Arts and Sciences, Boston College) ;
  • Lee, Minho (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Sook-Jeong (Department of Bioactive Material Science, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Seon-Young (Personalized Medicine Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology(KRIBB)) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Uk (Rare Disease Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology(KRIBB)) ;
  • Hoe, Kwang-Lae (Department of New Drug Development, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2021.09.13
  • Accepted : 2021.10.15
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Tamoxifen (TAM) is an anticancer drug used to treat estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. However, its ER-independent cytotoxic and antifungal activities have prompted debates on its mechanism of action. To achieve a better understanding of the ER-independent antifungal action mechanisms of TAM, we systematically identified TAM-sensitive genes through microarray screening of the heterozygous gene deletion library in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe). Secondary confirmation was followed by a spotting assay, finally yielding 13 TAM-sensitive genes under the drug-induced haploinsufficient condition. For these 13 TAM-sensitive genes, we conducted a comparative analysis of their Gene Ontology (GO) 'biological process' terms identified from other genome-wide screenings of the budding yeast deletion library and the MCF7 breast cancer cell line. Several TAM-sensitive genes overlapped between the yeast strains and MCF7 in GO terms including 'cell cycle' (cdc2, rik1, pas1, and leo1), 'signaling' (sck2, oga1, and cki3), and 'vesicle-mediated transport' (SPCC126.08c, vps54, sec72, and tvp15), suggesting their roles in the ER-independent cytotoxic effects of TAM. We recently reported that the cki3 gene with the 'signaling' GO term was related to the ER-independent antifungal action mechanisms of TAM in yeast. In this study, we report that haploinsufficiency of the essential vps54 gene, which encodes the GARP complex subunit, significantly aggravated TAM sensitivity and led to an enlarged vesicle structure in comparison with the SP286 control strain. These results strongly suggest that the vesicle-mediated transport process might be another action mechanism of the ER-independent antifungal or cytotoxic effects of TAM.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT; NRF-2017M3A 9B5060880). In addition, the authors were supported by Chungnam National University and the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB).

References

  1. Jordan VC. Tamoxifen: a most unlikely pioneering medicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003;2:205-213. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1031
  2. Friedman ZY. Recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of tamoxifen action. Cancer Invest 1998;16:391-396. https://doi.org/10.3109/07357909809115779
  3. Saini KS, Loi S, de Azambuja E, Metzger-Filho O, Saini ML, Ignatiadis M, et al. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Raf/MEK/ERK pathways in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2013;39:935-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.03.009
  4. Osborne CK, Boldt DH, Clark GM, Trent JM. Effects of tamoxifen on human breast cancer cell cycle kinetics: accumulation of cells in early G1 phase. Cancer Res 1983;43:3583-3585.
  5. Baral E, Nagy E, Berczi I. Modulation of natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity by tamoxifen and estradiol. Cancer 1995;75:591-599. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950115)75:2<591::AID-CNCR2820750224>3.0.CO;2-U
  6. Khan SZ, Longland CL, Michelangeli F. The effects of phenothiazines and other calmodulin antagonists on the sarcoplasmic and endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) pumps. Biochem Pharmacol 2000;60:1797-1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(00)00505-0
  7. Wiseman H, Cannon M, Arnstein HR, Halliwell B. Enhancement by tamoxifen of the membrane antioxidant action of the yeast membrane sterol ergosterol: relevance to the antiyeast and anticancer action of tamoxifen. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993;1181:201-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4439(93)90021-R
  8. Wagner EM, Gallagher SJ, Reddy S, Mitzner W. Effects of tamoxifen on ischemia-induced angiogenesis in the mouse lung. Angiogenesis 2003;6:65-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025822127847
  9. Altan N, Chen Y, Schindler M, Simon SM. Tamoxifen inhibits acidification in cells independent of the estrogen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:4432-4437. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.8.4432
  10. Gundimeda U, Chen ZH, Gopalakrishna R. Tamoxifen modulates protein kinase C via oxidative stress in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 1996;271:13504-13514. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.23.13504
  11. Chang Y, Lee JJ, Chen WF, Chou DS, Huang SY, Sheu JR. A novel role for tamoxifen in the inhibition of human platelets. Transl Res 2011;157:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2010.10.004
  12. Chen IC, Hsiao LP, Huang IW, Yu HC, Yeh LC, Lin CH, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase inhibitors, buparlisib and alpelisib, sensitize estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells to tamoxifen. Sci Rep 2017;7:9842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10555-z
  13. Chen Y, Schindler M, Simon SM. A mechanism for tamoxifen-mediated inhibition of acidification. J Biol Chem 1999;274:18364-18373. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.26.18364
  14. Hasegawa G, Akatsuka K, Nakashima Y, Yokoe Y, Higo N, Shimonaka M. Tamoxifen inhibits the proliferation of nonmelanoma skin cancer cells by increasing intracellular calcium concentration. Int J Oncol 2018;53:2157-2166.
  15. de Medina P, Favre G, Poirot M. Multiple targeting by the antitumor drug tamoxifen: a structure-activity study. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents 2004;4:491-508. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568011043352696
  16. Dolan K, Montgomery S, Buchheit B, Didone L, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. Antifungal activity of tamoxifen: in vitro and in vivo activities and mechanistic characterization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:3337-3346. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01564-08
  17. Beggs WH. Anti-Candida activity of the anti-cancer drug tamoxifen. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 1993;80:125-128.
  18. Lum PY, Armour CD, Stepaniants SB, Cavet G, Wolf MK, Butler JS, et al. Discovering modes of action for therapeutic compounds using a genome-wide screen of yeast heterozygotes. Cell 2004;116:121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01035-3
  19. Wiseman H, Cannon M, Arnstein HR. Observation and significance of growth inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (A224A) by the anti-oestrogen drug tamoxifen. Biochem Soc Trans 1989;17:1038-1039. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0171038
  20. Nguyen Hoang AT, Hoe KL, Lee SJ. CSNK1G2 differently sensitizes tamoxifen-induced decrease in PI3K/AKT/mTOR/S6K and ERK signaling according to the estrogen receptor existence in breast cancer cells. PLoS One 2021;16:e0246264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246264
  21. Nurse P. Fission yeast cell cycle mutants and the logic of eukaryotic cell cycle control. Mol Biol Cell 2020;31:2871-2873. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E20-10-0623
  22. Han S, Lee M, Chang H, Nam M, Park HO, Kwak YS, et al. Construction of the first compendium of chemical-genetic profiles in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and comparative compendium approach. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013;436:613-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.05.138
  23. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, Andre B, et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 1999;285:901-906. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5429.901
  24. Parsons AB, Lopez A, Givoni IE, Williams DE, Gray CA, Porter J, et al. Exploring the mode-of-action of bioactive compounds by chemical-genetic profiling in yeast. Cell 2006;126:611-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.040
  25. Iorns E, Lord CJ, Ashworth A. Parallel RNAi and compound screens identify the PDK1 pathway as a target for tamoxifen sensitization. Biochem J 2009;417:361-370. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20081682
  26. Mendes-Pereira AM, Sims D, Dexter T, Fenwick K, Assiotis I, Kozarewa I, et al. Genome-wide functional screen identifies a compendium of genes affecting sensitivity to tamoxifen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:2730-2735. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018872108
  27. Kim DU, Hayles J, Kim D, Wood V, Park HO, Won M, et al. Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:617-623. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1628
  28. Kume K, Hashimoto T, Suzuki M, Mizunuma M, Toda T, Hirata D. Identification of three signaling molecules required for calcineurin-dependent monopolar growth induced by the DNA replication checkpoint in fission yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2017;491:883-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.07.129
  29. Chesnel F, Couturier A, Alusse A, Gagne JP, Poirier GG, Jean D, et al. The prefoldin complex stabilizes the von Hippel-Lindau protein against aggregation and degradation. PLoS Genet 2020;16:e1009183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009183
  30. Haridas V. Tailoring of peptide vesicles: a bottom-up chemical approach. Acc Chem Res 2021;54:1934-1949. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00690
  31. Takegawa K, Iwaki T, Fujita Y, Morita T, Hosomi A, Tanaka N. Vesicle-mediated protein transport pathways to the vacuole in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cell Struct Funct 2003;28:399-417. https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.28.399
  32. Taleat Z, Larsson A, Ewing AG. Anticancer drug tamoxifen affects catecholamine transmitter release and storage from single cells. ACS Chem Neurosci 2019;10:2060-2069. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00714
  33. Wang CW, Klionsky DJ. The molecular mechanism of autophagy. Mol Med 2003;9:65-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03402040