DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Functional Traits of Non-woody Native and Naturalized Plant Species Living in a Riparian Park Area near the Hapcheon-Changyeong Weir in Nakdong River

낙동강 합천창녕보 주변 습지공원지역에 서식하는 자생 초본식물과 귀화 초본식물의 기능 형질 분석

  • Son, Min-Jeong (Department of Biology Education, Gyongsang National University) ;
  • Nam, Ki-Jung (Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 손민정 (경상국립대학교 생물교육과) ;
  • 남기정 (경상국립대학교 농업생명과학연구원)
  • Received : 2021.11.18
  • Accepted : 2021.11.30
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

The two main hypotheses that explain why invasive alien plants successfully colonize new environments are: 1) invasive alien plants are functionally different from native plants in a community, and 2) the plants can adapt well to new environments because they are functionally similar to native plants. The present study investigated the functional traits of naturalized alien herbaceous plants and their native neighbors in a riparian park area near the Hapcheon-Changyeong weir along the Nakdong River to determine which of the two hypotheses applied to the study area. According to the results, leaf functional traits, such as leaf area, specific leaf area, leaf thickness, leaf dry matter content, leaf nitrogen content, and leaf carbon content differed between naturalized alien and native plants, which could be attributed to the higher leaf nitrogen contents in naturalized alien plants than in native plants. The high leaf nitrogen contents are associated with high photosynthetic rates, which lead to effective resource use and rapid growth; therefore, naturalized alien plants growing in the study area were considered to have such functional traits. The results of the present study support the hypothesis that the successful establishment of invasive alien plants is attributed to the functional trait differences between invasive and native plants.

외래식물이 새로운 환경에 성공적으로 정착할 수 있는 이유를 설명하는 주된 두 개의 가설은, 외래식물이 새로 정착할 지역 군집 구성원들과 충분히 달라 경쟁을 피할 수 있기 때문이라는 것, 그리고 이미 적응하고 있는 그 지역 군집의 구성원과 유사하여 새로운 환경에 잘 적응할 수 있기 때문이라는 것이다. 본 연구는 낙동강변에 인위적으로 조성된 습지공원지역을 대상으로 외래(귀화) 초본식물과 자생 초본식물의 기능 형질을 조사하여 상호 비교 분석하여 앞의 두 가설 중 어느 가설이 맞는지 확인하고자 하였다. 식물 잎 형질 중, 잎 면적, 잎 면적비, 잎 두께, 잎 건조 중량, 잎 질소량, 잎 탄소량을 이용하여 분석한 결과, 외래(귀화)식물과 자생식물이 서로 구분되었고, 이는 외래(귀화)식물이 자생식물보다 잎 질소량이 높기 때문인 것으로 생각되었다. 높은 잎 질소량은 높은 광합성률과 연관되고 이는 효과적인 자원 이용 및 빠른 생장과 관련있음을 고려할 때, 본 연구지역에 정착한 외래식물 역시 이러한 기능적 특징을 가지고 있는 것으로 생각되었다. 본 연구 결과는 앞의 두 가설 중 외래식물과 자생식물의 기능적 차이가 외래식물 정착 성공을 결정한다는 가설을 지지하는 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2020년도 정부의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임 (2020R1F1A1072056).

References

  1. Catford, J.A., R. Jansson and C. Nilsson. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions 15: 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x
  2. Drenovsky, R.E., A. Khasanova and J.J. James. 2012. Trait convergence and plasticity among native and invasive species in resource-poor environments. American Journal of Botany 99: 629-639. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100417
  3. Funk, J.L. 2013. The physiology of invasive plants in low-resource environments. Conservation Physiology 1: 1-17.
  4. Funk, J.L., J.E. Larson, G.M. Ames, B.J. Butterfield, J. Cavender-Bares, J. Firn, D.C. Laughlin, A.E. Sutton-Grier, L. Williams and J. Wright. 2017. Revisiting the Holy Grail: using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes. Biological Reviews 92(2): 1156-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12275
  5. Gallagher, R.V., R.P. Randall and M.R. Leishman. 2014. Trait differences between naturalized and invasive plant species independent of residence time and phylogeny. Conservation Biology 29: 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12399
  6. Grotkopp, E. and M. Rejmanek. 2007. High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 94: 526-532. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.4.526
  7. Grotkopp, E., M. Rejmanek and T.L. Rost. 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. American Naturalist 159: 396-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/3079249
  8. Herms, D.A. and W.J. Mattson. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283-335. https://doi.org/10.1086/417659
  9. Hulme, P.E. and M. Bernard-Verdier. 2017. Comparing traits of native and alien plants: Can we do better? Functional Ecology 32: 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12982
  10. Kang, E.S., S.R. Lee, S.H. Oh, D.K. Kim, S.Y. Jung and D.C. Son. 2020. Comprehensive review about alien plants in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 50(2): 89-119. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2020.50.2.89
  11. Kim, J.H., M.J. Nam, C.E. Lim and J.S. Kim. 2021. New Record for Alien Plant, Kickxia elatine (L.) Dumort. (Plantaginaceae) in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Resources 34(1): 98-102. https://doi.org/10.7732/KJPR.2021.34.1.098
  12. Lee, J.M., E.J. Kim, H.H.M. Lee and K.T. Cho. 2021. Distributional Characteristics by Habitat Type of Alien Plants - For Gyeongsang Area in Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 54(2): 142-150. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2021.54.2.142
  13. Leishman, M.R., V.P. Thomson and J. Cooke. 2010. Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies. Journal of Ecology 98: 2-42.
  14. Lodge, A.G., T.J.S. Whitfeld, A.M. Roth and P.B. Reich. 2018. Invasive plants in Minnesota are "joining the locals": A trait-based analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 29(4): 746-755. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12659
  15. Perez-Harguindeguy, N., S. Diaz, E. Garnier, S. Lavorel, H. Poorter, P. Jaureguiberry and J.H.C. Cornelissen. 2014. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 61: 167-234. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225
  16. Perez-Ramos, I.M., L. Matias, L. Gomez-Aparicio and O. Godoy. 2019. Functional traits and phenotypic plasticity modulate species coexistence across contrasting climatic conditions. Nature Communications 10: 2555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10453-0
  17. R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  18. Scharfy, D., A. Funk, H. Olde Venterink and S. Gusewell. 2011. Invasive forbs differ functionally from native graminoids, but are similar to native forbs. New Phytologist 189: 818-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03531.x
  19. Tecco, P.A., C. Urcelay, S. Diaz, M. Cabido and N. Perez-Harguindeguy. 2013. Contrasting functional trait syndromes underlay woody alien success in the same ecosystem. Austral Ecology 38: 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02428.x
  20. Warton, D.I., I.J. Wright, D.S. Falster and M. Westoby. 2006. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews 81: 259-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793106007007
  21. Zeballos, S.R., M.A. Giorgis, A.M. Cingolani, M. Cabido, J.I. Whitworth-Hulse and D.E. Gurvich. 2014. Do alien and native tree species from Central Argentina differ in their water transport strategy? Austral Ecology 39: 984-991. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12171