한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

식생활 라이프스타일에 따른 밀키트 이용 현황과 만족도에 관한 연구

A Study on the Utilization and Satisfaction of Meal-Kits by Food-Related Lifestyle

  • 투고 : 2021.11.30
  • 심사 : 2021.12.20
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 밀키트를 이용한 경험이 있는 성인 357명을 대상으로 식생활 라이프스타일에 따른 밀키트 이용 현황과 만족도 차이를 분석하였고 밀키트 시장에 효율적인 메뉴 구성과 개선 방향을 제안하는 기초자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 식생활 라이프스타일 유형을 군집분석한 결과는 '건강추구 집단', '안전추구 집단', '편리추구 집단', '경제추구 집단', '미식추구 집단' 등의 5가지 집단으로 군집화되었다. 밀키트 월평균 구매가격은 미식추구 집단의 경우 밀키트 '3-5만원'이 36.66%로 상대적으로 다른 집단에 비해 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 밀키트를 구매하는 장소는 '온라인 쇼핑몰'에서 전체 대상자의 52.38%로 나타났고 밀키트 구매 시 중요하게 고려하는 요인으로는 '맛'으로 경제추구 집단의 경우 전체의 58.46%로 다른 집단에 비해 높게 나타났다. 밀키트 선호 음식 종류는 '한식'이 전체의 49.02%가 선호하였다. 식재료는 모든 유형 집단에서 '육류'가 전체 42.58%로 가장 높았으며, 특히 미식추구 집단(53.33%)에서 높았다(p<0.001). 밀키트 만족도에서 '조리방법의 간편성'이 4.05점으로 미식추구 집단에서 가장 높은 만족도를 보였고 '재료의 원산지'의 경우 편리추구 집단에서 2.98점으로 다른 집단에 비해 낮은 만족도를 보였다(p<0.01). 전체 대상자의 93.28%가 앞으로 밀키트를 이용하겠다고 하였다. 전체의 93.28%는 다른 사람에게 밀키트 이용을 추천하겠다고 하였으며, 추천이유로는 '구매 또는 조리의 편리성'이 전체의 67.23%로 나타났다. 본 연구의 조사결과, 모든 군집에서 가장 중요한 요인은 맛으로 나타났으며 조리방법의 간편성이 가장 높은 만족도를 보였지만 재료의 원산지는 낮은 만족도를 나타냈다. 따라서 밀키트 시장이 성장하기 위해서는 밀키트 품질 개선과 다양한 메뉴 개발이 이루어야 할 것으로 보인다.

This study was conducted to investigate the utilization and satisfaction of meal-kits according to food-related lifestyle among total 357 adults who had experience in using meal-kits. This study can provide basic data for effective menu composition and directions toward improvement. The participants of the study were classified into 5 groups 'health-type group', 'economic-type group', 'safety-type group', 'tasty-type group' and 'convenience-type group'. The 'tastye-type group' were found to spend more on purchasing meal-kits than other groups with the higher proportion(36.66%) of spending '30,000-50,000'won(p<0.05), which is the highest price category. The important factors that contributed to purchasing a meal-kits were 'taste'(50.98%), and 'economic-type group' showed the highest tendency of considering taste (58.46%). About half(49.02%) of the respondents preferred 'Korean-food' for meal-kits as for the type of food. All groups highly preferred 'meat'(42.58%) as the main ingredient, particularly the 'tasty-type group'(53.33%)(p<0.001). The 'tasty-type group' showed the highest satisfaction on 'convenience of cooking'(4.05), and 'convenience-type group' showed the lowest satisfaction on the 'origin of ingredient'(2.98) among groups (p<0.01). The overall response indicated that most respondents are willing to use meal-kits in the future (97.20%); and 93.28% of respondents would recommend the purchase of meal-kits to others, where 'convenience of cooking/purchase' was the factor contributing most for recommending(67.23%). Taken together, 'taste' was the most important factor for all groups. And 'Convenience of cooking' was the factor contributing to satisfaction most while 'origin of ingredient' contributing the least. It is recommended for the growth of meal-kits industry, to improve the quality of the meal-kits products and develop various menus.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brunsoe, K., & Grunert, K. G. (1995). Development and testing of a cross-culturally valid instrument: Food-related life style. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 475-480.
  2. Choi, T. H., Lee, M. C., & Kim, D. S. (2020). The effect of selection attributes of meal-kit home replacement food (HMR) on satisfaction and repurchase intention. Culinary Science and Hospitality Research, 26(5), 119-128. doi:10.20878/cshr.2020.26.5.012
  3. Hong, W.-S. (2017). A study on the development strategy of home meal replacement in relation to the consumption trends. Food Science and Industry, 50(3), 2-32. https://doi.org/10.23093/FSI.2017.50.3.2
  4. Hwang, J.-S., Park, G.-C., Yoon, Y.-J., & Kim, H.-J. (2018). A study on the management strategy using product attributes in the home meal replacement market. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 27(8), 327-338. doi:10.24992/kjht.2018.12.27.08.327
  5. Im, J.-B., Seo, B.-S., Lee, H.-G., & Chang, Y.-K. (1990). Life style and dietary pattern. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 28(3), 33-52.
  6. Kim, H., Huh, I.-J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2020). A study on the utilization and satisfaction of commercially available lunchbox by dietary lifestyle. Korean Journal of Community Nutrition, 25(4), 267-279. doi:10.5720/kjcn.2020.25.4.267
  7. Kim, H.-J., & Huh, J. (2013). SPSS 21.0 통계분석 및 해설 [SPSS 21.0 Statistical analysis commentary]. Seoul: Topbooks.
  8. Kim, H.-J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2017). A study on food purchasing behavior through internet shopping according to food-related lifestyles of housewives. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 26(6), 597-608. doi:10.5934/kjhe.2017.26.6.597
  9. Kim, M., & Kim, H. (2009). A Study on the consumption behaviors regarding red pepper paste according to the food-related lifestyles of housewives. Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life, 19(1), 1-8.
  10. Kim, O. S. (2018). 새로운 식생활 트렌드 밀키트 [New food-lifestyle trend, meal-kits]. Proceedings of the 2018 Autumn the East Asian Society of Dietary Life Conference (pp. 95-97). Seoul: The East Asian Society of Dietary Life.
  11. Kim, Y.-A., & Youn, H.-W. (2014). A study on single people's satisfaction of convenience foods and repurchase intention according to their food-related lifestyle. Proceedings of the 2014 Autumn Korean Hospitality and Tourism Academe Conference (pp. 35-47). Seoul: Korean Hospitality and Tourism Academe.
  12. Korea Agro-Fisheries and Food Corporation (2019). 2019 가공식품 세분시장 현황-간편식시장 [2019 Processed food segmentation market status- HMR]. Naju: Author
  13. Korea Agro-Fisheries and Food Trade Corporation (2021). 식품산업 트렌드픽국내편-밀키트 [Domestic food industry trend pick-meal-kits]. Naju: Author
  14. Korea Rural Economic Institute (2020a). Consumer behavior for meat consumption and tasks to respond to its changes. Naju: Author
  15. Korea Rural Economic Institute (2020b). 2020 농소모 활동보고서 (한국농촌경제연구원 소비자트렌트 모니터) [2020 Consumer trend monitor activity report]. Naju: Author
  16. Korea Rural Economic Institute (2020c). The use of domestic agricultural ingredients and improvement measures for the home meal replacement(HMR) industry. Naju: Author
  17. Lazer, W. (1963). Life style concepts and marketing. Toward Scientific Marketing, 15(4), 130-139.
  18. Lee, E.-Y., Kim, Y.-M., & Choi, M.-K. (2021). Meal kit purchasing behavior and relationship with the nutrition quotient of young adults in Chungnam. Journal of Nutrition and Health, 54(5), 534-546. doi:10.4163/jnh.2021.54.5.534.
  19. Lee, H.-Y., Chung, L., & Yang, I. (2005). Conceptualizing and prospecting for home meal replacement in Korea by Delphi technique. Journal of Nutrition and Health, 38(3), 251-258.
  20. Lee, S.-I. (2020). Perception analysis of consumer preferences for rice according to food-related lifestyle types: Longitudinal study using Big Data. Journal of Product Research, 38(1), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.36345/KACST.2020.38.1.020
  21. Lee, S.-J., Lee, S.-H., Yoon, J.-I., Heo, S.-J., Wee, G. Y., Yoon, D.-H.,...Bae, H. J. (2018). 고객 특성에 따른 즉석섭취 도시락 메뉴의 선호도 분석[Analyzed preference lunch box menu according to the customer characteristics]. Proceedings of the 2018 Spring the East Asian Society of Dietary Life Conference (p. 222). Seoul: The East Asian Society of Dietary Life.
  22. Lee, Y.-N., Jang, H.-J., Choi, Y.-W., Choi, Y.-S., & Oh, J.-E. (2021). A study on the consumer perception and importance-performance analysis of the vegetarian meal-kit development. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 21(3), 324-335. doi:10.5392/jkca.2021.21.03.324
  23. Lee, Y.-R., Kim, S.-H., & Ahn, S.-C. (2009). A study on the difference in the importance of spatial presentation and food among potential customers of a party by patterns of eating lifestyle. Culinary Science and Hospitality Research, 15(2), 282-297. https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2009.15.2.022022022
  24. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (2020). 2020 Standard and specification by food. Retrieved from https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_99/view.do?seq=44359&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=28
  25. Mun, J.-Y., Ban, H.-J., & Kim, H.-S. (2020). A study on consumers' perception of meal-kit: After the spread of coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19). Culinary Science of Hospitality Research, 26(10), 198-207. doi:10.20878/cshr.2020.26.10.018
  26. Myung, C., Nam, H., & Park, Y. (2016). Purchasing behaviors and needs for HMR according to the food-related lifestyles of baby boomer women. The Korean Journal of Food and Nutrition, 29(1), 87-103. doi:10.9799/ksfan.2016.29.1.087
  27. Oh, W.-K., & Hong, J.-Y. (2019). IPA analysis on selection attributes of RTC (Ready to Cook) type meal-kit HMR(Home Meal Replacement). Culinary Science and Hospitality Research, 25(11), 69-81. doi:10.20878/cshr.2019.25.11.008
  28. Oh, W.-K., & Hwang, S.-J. (2021). The effect of selective attributes of meal kit according to eating lifestyle on satisfaction. FoodService Industry Journal, 17(1), 31-50.
  29. Oh, Y. A. (2020). The influence of meal kit selection attributes on convenience orientation and meal kit use: Application of the household production theory. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  30. Park, M.-H., Kwon, M.-W., & Nah, K. (2019). Study on repurchase intention of RTP HMR products: Focused on meal kit. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(2), 548-557. doi:10.5392/jkca2019.19.02.548
  31. Park, S., & Hwang, J. H. (2021). A study on the effect of meal-kit selection properties on consumers'purchasing. The Journal of Social Science, 28(1), 157-175. doi:10.46415/jss.2021.03.28.1.157
  32. Um, E. K. (2015). A study on the segmentation of food related lifestyle within Korean family. Journal of Hotel and Resort, 14(3), 247-265.
  33. Yang, Y.-Y., Kwon, Y.-S., Park, Y.-H., & Yun, Y. (2019). Importance-performance analysis regarding selective attribution of meal-kit products. Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life, 29(6), 519-528. doi:10.17495/easdl.12.29.6.519
  34. Yi, N.-Y., & Choi, J.-H. (2019). A study of the consumer perception of meal kit using big data analysis. FoodService Industry Journal, 15(4), 211-222. doi:10.22509/kfsa.2019.15.4.016
  35. Yun, J.-B. (2020). A study on importance and performance comparison of choice attributes by age of meal kit HMR(Home Meal Replacement) consumers. Unpublished master's thesis, Daegu Haany University, Daegu, Korea.