Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research (임상간호연구)

Hospital Nurses Association (병원간호사회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance, Perception, and Influencing Contexts of Intentional Rounding

의도적 간호순회 인식과 배경요인이 이행에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Mi Young (Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Mi Soon (Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Ae Ran (Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Hee Sun (Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center)
  • Received : 2020.01.30
  • Accepted : 2021.02.22
  • Published : 2021.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This descriptive study aimed to explore the performance, nurses' perception, and influencing contexts of intentional rounding (IR), and to identify the factors influencing the performance of IR. Methods: 498 questionnaire responses were collected from clinical nurses with more than six months of work experiences in general wards performing IR in a general hospital. Results: The mean scores of the performance, nurses' perception, and influencing contexts of IR were 3.81(±0.68), 3.46(±0.42), and 3.79(±0.51) out of 5.00, respectively. There were significant differences in performance (F=20.51, p<.001) and nurses' perception (F=4.96, p=.001) based on the work department. There were significant differences in the influencing contexts based on age (F=6.02, p=.003) and the length of clinical experience in the ward (F=3.36, p=.010). Performance and nurses' perception(r=.42, p<.001), performance and influencing contexts (r=.46, p<.001), and nurses' perception and influencing contexts (r=.58, p<.001) showed a statistically positive correlation. Work unit (F=10.45, p<.001), nurses' perception of the benefits to patients (F=-2.46, p=.014) and to nurses (F=4.34, p<.001), and influencing contexts at the individual (F=7.77, p<.001) and department levels (F=2.99, p=.003) were found to be significant factors on the performance of IR. Conclusion: It is necessary to support the education programs and active participation of nurses in their role as leaders to raise their awareness regarding the benefits of IR. Furthermore, there is a need to adapt the IR protocol according to the unique characteristics of each unit and evaluate the effectiveness.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2019년 삼성서울병원 간호본부에서 연구비를 지원받아 진행한 연구임.

References

  1. Meade CM, Bursell AL, Ketelsen L. Effects of nursing rounds: On patients' call light use, satisfaction, and safety. American Journal of Nursing. 2006;106(9):58-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-200609000-00029
  2. Fitzsimons B, Bartley A, Cornwell J. Intentional rounding: Its role in supporting essential care. Nursing Times. 2011;107 (27):18-21.
  3. Kirk K, Kane R. A qualitative exploration of intentional nursing round models in the emergency department setting: Investigating the barriers to their use and success. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2016;25(9-10):1262-1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13150
  4. Neville K, DiBona C, Mahler M. Validation of the nurses' perception of patient rounding scale: An exploratory study of the influence of shift work on nurses' perception of patient rounding. Orthopaedic Nursing. 2016;35(2):84-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000223
  5. Rondinelli J, Ecker M, Crawford C, Seelinger C, Omery A. Hourly rounding implementation: A multisite description of structures, processes, and outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2012;42(6):326-332. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e31824ccd43
  6. Ryan L, Jackson D, Woods C, Usher K. Intentional rounding: An integrative literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2019;75(6):1151-1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13897
  7. Deitrick LM, Baker K, Paxton H, Flores M, Swavely D. Hourly rounding: Challenges with implementation of an evidence-based process. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2012;27(1): 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e318227d7dd
  8. Han JS, Kim YH. Factors influencing intentional rounding performance of tertiary general hospital nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2019;25(5):437-447. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2019.25.5.437
  9. Neville K, Lake K, LeMunyon D, Paul D, Whitmore K. Nurses' perceptions of patient rounding. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2012;42(2):83-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e318243365e
  10. Sims S, Leamy M, Davies N, Schnitzler K, Levenson R, Mayer F, et al. Realist synthesis of intentional rounding in hospital wards: Exploring the evidence of what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2018;27 (9):743-757. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006757
  11. Yang SH, Jang KS, Park HY. Effects of clinical nurse's intentional nursing rounds on patient needs and satisfaction. Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics. 2015;40(1):87-100.
  12. Brosey LA, March KS. Effectiveness of structured hourly nurse rounding on patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2015;30(2):153-159. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000086
  13. Fabry D. Hourly rounding: Perspectives and perceptions of the frontline nursing staff. Journal of Nursing Management. 2015;23(2):200-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12114
  14. Morgan L, Flynn L, Robertson E, New S, Forde-Johnston C, McCulloch P. Intentional Rounding: A staff-led quality improvement intervention in the prevention of patient falls. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017;26(1-2):115-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13401
  15. East L, Targett D, Yeates H, Ryan E, Quiddington L, Woods C. Nurse and patient satisfaction with intentional rounding in a rural Australian setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2020;29 (7-8):1365-1371. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15180
  16. Tea C, Ellison M, Feghali F. Proactive patient rounding to increase customer service and satisfaction on an orthopaedic unit. Orthopaedic Nursing. 2008;27(4):233-240. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NOR.0000330305.45361.45
  17. Tucker SJ, Bieber PL, Attlesey-Pries JM, Olson ME, Dierkhising RA. Outcomes and challenges in implementing hourly rounds to reduce falls in orthopedic units. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2012;9(1):18-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00227.x
  18. Samsung Medical Center. In-hospital nursing guideline: Nursing rounds. Seoul: Samsung Medical Center; 2015 Apr. No.: NSD-002-3311.
  19. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research. 1986;35(6):382-385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
  20. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health. 2006;29(5):489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
  21. Kim JH. Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2019;72(6):558-569. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087
  22. Lowe L, Hodgson G. Hourly rounding in a high dependency unit. Nursing Standard. 2012;27(8):35-40. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2012.10.27.8.35.c9362
  23. Woodard JL. Effects of rounding on patient satisfaction and patient safety on a medical-surgical unit. Clinical Nurse Specialist. 2009;23(4):200-206. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181a8ca8a
  24. Dix G, Phillips J, Braide M. Engaging staff with intentional rounding. Nursing Times. 2012;108(3):14-16.
  25. Shepard LH. Stop going in circles! Break the barriers to hourly rounding. Nursing Manangement. 2013;44(2):13-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000426147.98903.ae